Claudia Pogoreutz1, Mauvis A Gore2,3, Gabriela Perna1, Catriona Millar2,3, Robert Nestler4, Rupert F Ormond5,6,7, Christopher R Clarke8, Christian R Voolstra9,10. 1. Red Sea Research Center, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955, Saudi Arabia. 2. Marine Conservation International, South Queensferry, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. 3. Centre for Marine Biodiversity & Biotechnology, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. 4. Veterinär-Physiologisch-Chemisches Institut, University of Leipzig, 04107 Leipzig, Germany. 5. Marine Conservation International, South Queensferry, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. rupert.ormond.mci@gmail.com. 6. Centre for Marine Biodiversity & Biotechnology, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. rupert.ormond.mci@gmail.com. 7. Faculty of Marine Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia. rupert.ormond.mci@gmail.com. 8. Marine Research Facility, North Obhur, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. 9. Red Sea Research Center, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955, Saudi Arabia. christian.voolstra@uni-konstanz.de. 10. Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78457, Konstanz, Germany. christian.voolstra@uni-konstanz.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sharks are in severe global decline due to human exploitation. The additional concern of emerging diseases for this ancient group of fish, however, remains poorly understood. While wild-caught and captive sharks may be susceptible to bacterial and transmissible diseases, recent reports suggest that shark skin may harbor properties that prevent infection, such as a specialized ultrastructure or innate immune properties, possibly related to associated microbial assemblages. To assess whether bacterial community composition differs between visibly healthy and insulted (injured) shark skin, we compared bacterial assemblages of skin covering the gills and the back from 44 wild-caught black-tip reef sharks (Carcharhinus melanopterus) from the Amirante Islands (Seychelles) via 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. RESULTS: Shark skin-associated bacterial communities were diverse (5971 bacterial taxa from 375 families) and dominated by three families of the phylum Proteobacteria typical of marine organisms and environments (Rhodobacteraceae, Alteromonadaceae, Halomonadaceae). Significant differences in bacterial community composition of skin were observed for sharks collected from different sites, but not between healthy or injured skin samples or skin type (gills vs. back). The core microbiome (defined as bacterial taxa present in ≥50% of all samples) consisted of 12 bacterial taxa, which are commonly observed in marine organisms, some of which may be associated with animal host health. CONCLUSION: The conserved bacterial community composition of healthy and injured shark skin samples suggests absence of severe bacterial infections or substantial pathogen propagation upon skin insult. While a mild bacterial infection may have gone undetected, the overall conserved bacterial community implies that bacterial function(s) may be maintained in injured skin. At present, the contribution of bacteria, besides intrinsic animal host factors, to counter skin infection and support rapid wound healing in sharks are unknown. This represents clear knowledge gaps that should be addressed in future work, e.g. by screening for antimicrobial properties of skin-associated bacterial isolates.
BACKGROUND: Sharks are in severe global decline due to human exploitation. The additional concern of emerging diseases for this ancient group of fish, however, remains poorly understood. While wild-caught and captive sharks may be susceptible to bacterial and transmissible diseases, recent reports suggest that shark skin may harbor properties that prevent infection, such as a specialized ultrastructure or innate immune properties, possibly related to associated microbial assemblages. To assess whether bacterial community composition differs between visibly healthy and insulted (injured) shark skin, we compared bacterial assemblages of skin covering the gills and the back from 44 wild-caught black-tip reef sharks (Carcharhinus melanopterus) from the Amirante Islands (Seychelles) via 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. RESULTS: Shark skin-associated bacterial communities were diverse (5971 bacterial taxa from 375 families) and dominated by three families of the phylum Proteobacteria typical of marine organisms and environments (Rhodobacteraceae, Alteromonadaceae, Halomonadaceae). Significant differences in bacterial community composition of skin were observed for sharks collected from different sites, but not between healthy or injured skin samples or skin type (gills vs. back). The core microbiome (defined as bacterial taxa present in ≥50% of all samples) consisted of 12 bacterial taxa, which are commonly observed in marine organisms, some of which may be associated with animal host health. CONCLUSION: The conserved bacterial community composition of healthy and injured shark skin samples suggests absence of severe bacterial infections or substantial pathogen propagation upon skin insult. While a mild bacterial infection may have gone undetected, the overall conserved bacterial community implies that bacterial function(s) may be maintained in injured skin. At present, the contribution of bacteria, besides intrinsic animal host factors, to counter skin infection and support rapid wound healing in sharks are unknown. This represents clear knowledge gaps that should be addressed in future work, e.g. by screening for antimicrobial properties of skin-associated bacterial isolates.
Authors: Julia K Baum; Ransom A Myers; Daniel G Kehler; Boris Worm; Shelton J Harley; Penny A Doherty Journal: Science Date: 2003-01-17 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Patrick D Schloss; Sarah L Westcott; Thomas Ryabin; Justine R Hall; Martin Hartmann; Emily B Hollister; Ryan A Lesniewski; Brian B Oakley; Donovan H Parks; Courtney J Robinson; Jason W Sahl; Blaz Stres; Gerhard G Thallinger; David J Van Horn; Carolyn F Weber Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Shravanthi T Reddy; Kenneth K Chung; Clinton J McDaniel; Rabih O Darouiche; Jaime Landman; Anthony B Brennan Journal: J Endourol Date: 2011-08-05 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: James S E Lea; Nicolas E Humphries; Rainer G von Brandis; Christopher R Clarke; David W Sims Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Amy Apprill; Jooke Robbins; A Murat Eren; Adam A Pack; Julie Reveillaud; David Mattila; Michael Moore; Misty Niemeyer; Kathleen M T Moore; Tracy J Mincer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: K C Bierlich; Carolyn Miller; Emelia DeForce; Ari S Friedlaender; David W Johnston; Amy Apprill Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Teruaki Nakatsuji; Tiffany H Chen; Saisindhu Narala; Kimberly A Chun; Aimee M Two; Tong Yun; Faiza Shafiq; Paul F Kotol; Amina Bouslimani; Alexey V Melnik; Haythem Latif; Ji-Nu Kim; Alexandre Lockhart; Keli Artis; Gloria David; Patricia Taylor; Joanne Streib; Pieter C Dorrestein; Alex Grier; Steven R Gill; Karsten Zengler; Tissa R Hata; Donald Y M Leung; Richard L Gallo Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Michael P Doane; Colton J Johnson; Shaili Johri; Emma N Kerr; Megan M Morris; Ric Desantiago; Abigail C Turnlund; Asha Goodman; Maria Mora; Laís Farias Oliveira Lima; Andrew P Nosal; Elizabeth A Dinsdale Journal: Microb Ecol Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 4.552
Authors: Claudia Pogoreutz; Clinton A Oakley; Nils Rädecker; Anny Cárdenas; Gabriela Perna; Nan Xiang; Lifeng Peng; Simon K Davy; David K Ngugi; Christian R Voolstra Journal: ISME J Date: 2022-04-20 Impact factor: 11.217
Authors: Zoe A Pratte; Cameron Perry; Alistair D M Dove; Lisa A Hoopes; Kim B Ritchie; Robert E Hueter; Chris Fischer; Alisa L Newton; Frank J Stewart Journal: Anim Microbiome Date: 2022-03-04
Authors: Ryan D Hesse; Michael Roach; Emma N Kerr; Bhavya Papudeshi; Laís F O Lima; Asha Z Goodman; Lisa Hoopes; Mark Scott; Lauren Meyer; Charlie Huveneers; Elizabeth A Dinsdale Journal: Viruses Date: 2022-09-05 Impact factor: 5.818