Jothi K Yuvaraj1, Rebecca E Roberts1, Yonathan Sonntag2, Xiao-Qing Hou1, Ewald Grosse-Wilde3,4, Aleš Machara5, Dan-Dan Zhang1, Bill S Hansson3, Urban Johanson2, Christer Löfstedt1, Martin N Andersson6. 1. Department of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden. 2. Division of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden. 3. Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745, Jena, Germany. 4. Present address: Faculty of Forestry & Wood Sci, Excellent Team for Mitigation, Czech University Life Sci Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6, 16521, Suchdol, Czech Republic. 5. Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Gilead Sciences and IOCB Research Center, Flemingovo n. 2, 166 10, Prague 6, Czech Republic. 6. Department of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden. martin_n.andersson@biol.lu.se.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bark beetles are major pests of conifer forests, and their behavior is primarily mediated via olfaction. Targeting the odorant receptors (ORs) may thus provide avenues towards improved pest control. Such an approach requires information on the function of ORs and their interactions with ligands, which is also essential for understanding the functional evolution of these receptors. Hence, we aimed to identify a high-quality complement of ORs from the destructive spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae) and analyze their antennal expression and phylogenetic relationships with ORs from other beetles. Using 68 biologically relevant test compounds, we next aimed to functionally characterize ecologically important ORs, using two systems for heterologous expression. Our final aim was to gain insight into the ligand-OR interaction of the functionally characterized ORs, using a combination of computational and experimental methods. RESULTS: We annotated 73 ORs from an antennal transcriptome of I. typographus and report the functional characterization of two ORs (ItypOR46 and ItypOR49), which are responsive to single enantiomers of the common bark beetle pheromone compounds ipsenol and ipsdienol, respectively. Their responses and antennal expression correlate with the specificities, localizations, and/or abundances of olfactory sensory neurons detecting these enantiomers. We use homology modeling and molecular docking to predict their binding sites. Our models reveal a likely binding cleft lined with residues that previously have been shown to affect the responses of insect ORs. Within this cleft, the active ligands are predicted to specifically interact with residues Tyr84 and Thr205 in ItypOR46. The suggested importance of these residues in the activation by ipsenol is experimentally supported through site-directed mutagenesis and functional testing, and hydrogen bonding appears key in pheromone binding. CONCLUSIONS: The emerging insight into ligand binding in the two characterized ItypORs has a general importance for our understanding of the molecular and functional evolution of the insect OR gene family. Due to the ecological importance of the characterized receptors and widespread use of ipsenol and ipsdienol in bark beetle chemical communication, these ORs should be evaluated for their potential use in pest control and biosensors to detect bark beetle infestations.
BACKGROUND:Bark beetles are major pests of conifer forests, and their behavior is primarily mediated via olfaction. Targeting the odorant receptors (ORs) may thus provide avenues towards improved pest control. Such an approach requires information on the function of ORs and their interactions with ligands, which is also essential for understanding the functional evolution of these receptors. Hence, we aimed to identify a high-quality complement of ORs from the destructive spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae) and analyze their antennal expression and phylogenetic relationships with ORs from other beetles. Using 68 biologically relevant test compounds, we next aimed to functionally characterize ecologically important ORs, using two systems for heterologous expression. Our final aim was to gain insight into the ligand-OR interaction of the functionally characterized ORs, using a combination of computational and experimental methods. RESULTS: We annotated 73 ORs from an antennal transcriptome of I. typographus and report the functional characterization of two ORs (ItypOR46 and ItypOR49), which are responsive to single enantiomers of the common bark beetle pheromone compounds ipsenol and ipsdienol, respectively. Their responses and antennal expression correlate with the specificities, localizations, and/or abundances of olfactory sensory neurons detecting these enantiomers. We use homology modeling and molecular docking to predict their binding sites. Our models reveal a likely binding cleft lined with residues that previously have been shown to affect the responses of insect ORs. Within this cleft, the active ligands are predicted to specifically interact with residues Tyr84 and Thr205 in ItypOR46. The suggested importance of these residues in the activation by ipsenol is experimentally supported through site-directed mutagenesis and functional testing, and hydrogen bonding appears key in pheromone binding. CONCLUSIONS: The emerging insight into ligand binding in the two characterized ItypORs has a general importance for our understanding of the molecular and functional evolution of the insect OR gene family. Due to the ecological importance of the characterized receptors and widespread use of ipsenol and ipsdienol in bark beetle chemical communication, these ORs should be evaluated for their potential use in pest control and biosensors to detect bark beetle infestations.
Authors: Thanihaichelvan Murugathas; Han Yue Zheng; Damon Colbert; Andrew V Kralicek; Colm Carraher; Natalie O V Plank Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Peter H W Biedermann; Jörg Müller; Jean-Claude Grégoire; Axel Gruppe; Jonas Hagge; Almuth Hammerbacher; Richard W Hofstetter; Dineshkumar Kandasamy; Miroslav Kolarik; Martin Kostovcik; Paal Krokene; Aurélien Sallé; Diana L Six; Tabea Turrini; Dan Vanderpool; Michael J Wingfield; Claus Bässler Journal: Trends Ecol Evol Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 17.712
Authors: Brenda Oppert; Anna Muszewska; Kamil Steczkiewicz; Eva Šatović-Vukšić; Miroslav Plohl; Jeffrey A Fabrick; Konstantin S Vinokurov; Igor Koloniuk; J Spencer Johnston; Timothy P L Smith; Raul Narciso C Guedes; Walter R Terra; Clélia Ferreira; Renata O Dias; Konstantin A Chaply; Elena N Elpidina; Valeriia F Tereshchenkova; Robert F Mitchell; Audra J Jenson; Rachel McKay; Tisheng Shan; Xiaolong Cao; Zelong Miao; Chao Xiong; Haobo Jiang; William R Morrison; Sergey Koren; David Schlipalius; Marcé D Lorenzen; Raman Bansal; Yu-Hui Wang; Lindsey Perkin; Monica Poelchau; Kenlee Friesen; Morgan L Olmstead; Erin Scully; James F Campbell Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 4.141
Authors: Sigrid Netherer; Dineshkumar Kandasamy; Anna Jirosová; Blanka Kalinová; Martin Schebeck; Fredrik Schlyter Journal: J Pest Sci (2004) Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Rebecca E Roberts; Twinkle Biswas; Jothi Kumar Yuvaraj; Ewald Grosse-Wilde; Daniel Powell; Bill S Hansson; Christer Löfstedt; Martin N Andersson Journal: Mol Ecol Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 6.622
Authors: Martin N Andersson; Fredrik Schlyter; Daniel Powell; Ewald Groβe-Wilde; Paal Krokene; Amit Roy; Amrita Chakraborty; Christer Löfstedt; Heiko Vogel Journal: Commun Biol Date: 2021-09-09