Literature DB >> 33499625

Plasmon-enhanced coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering vs plasmon-enhanced stimulated Raman scattering: Comparison of line shape and enhancement factor.

Cheng Zong1, Yurun Xie2, Meng Zhang1, Yimin Huang3, Chen Yang1, Ji-Xin Cheng1.   

Abstract

Plasmon-enhanced coherent Raman scattering microscopy has reached single-molecule detection sensitivity. Due to the different driven fields, there are significant differences between a coherent Raman scattering process and its plasmon-enhanced derivative. The commonly accepted line shapes for coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering and stimulated Raman scattering do not hold for the plasmon-enhanced condition. Here, we present a theoretical model that describes the spectral line shapes in plasmon-enhanced coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (PECARS). Experimentally, we measured PECARS and plasmon-enhanced stimulated Raman scattering (PESRS) spectra of 4-mercaptopyridine adsorbed on the self-assembled Au nanoparticle (NP) substrate and aggregated Au NP colloids. The PECARS spectra show a nondispersive line shape, while the PESRS spectra exhibit a dispersive line shape. PECARS shows a higher signal to noise ratio and a larger enhancement factor than PESRS from the same specimen. It is verified that the nonresonant background in PECARS originates from the photoluminescence of nanostructures. The decoupling of background and the vibrational resonance component results in the nondispersive line shape in PECARS. More local electric field enhancements are involved in the PECARS process than in PESRS, which results in a higher enhancement factor in PECARS. The current work provides new insight into the mechanism of plasmon-enhanced coherent Raman scattering and helps to optimize the experimental design for ultrasensitive chemical imaging.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33499625      PMCID: PMC7816769          DOI: 10.1063/5.0035163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  31 in total

1.  Baseline correction using adaptive iteratively reweighted penalized least squares.

Authors:  Zhi-Min Zhang; Shan Chen; Yi-Zeng Liang
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.616

2.  Label-free DNA imaging in vivo with stimulated Raman scattering microscopy.

Authors:  Fa-Ke Lu; Srinjan Basu; Vivien Igras; Mai P Hoang; Minbiao Ji; Dan Fu; Gary R Holtom; Victor A Neel; Christian W Freudiger; David E Fisher; X Sunney Xie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Chemical imaging of tissue in vivo with video-rate coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy.

Authors:  Conor L Evans; Eric O Potma; Mehron Puoris'haag; Daniel Côté; Charles P Lin; X Sunney Xie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Lipid Desaturation Is a Metabolic Marker and Therapeutic Target of Ovarian Cancer Stem Cells.

Authors:  Junjie Li; Salvatore Condello; Jessica Thomes-Pepin; Xiaoxiao Ma; Yu Xia; Thomas D Hurley; Daniela Matei; Ji-Xin Cheng
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  Surface-Enhanced Femtosecond Stimulated Raman Spectroscopy at 1 MHz Repetition Rates.

Authors:  Lauren E Buchanan; Natalie L Gruenke; Michael O McAnally; Bogdan Negru; Hannah E Mayhew; Vartkess A Apkarian; George C Schatz; Richard P Van Duyne
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 6.475

6.  Junction Plasmon Driven Population Inversion of Molecular Vibrations: A Picosecond Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Study.

Authors:  Kevin T Crampton; Alexander Fast; Eric O Potma; V Ara Apkarian
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 11.189

7.  Coupled wave equations theory of surface-enhanced femtosecond stimulated Raman scattering.

Authors:  Michael O McAnally; Jeffrey M McMahon; Richard P Van Duyne; George C Schatz
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Video-rate molecular imaging in vivo with stimulated Raman scattering.

Authors:  Brian G Saar; Christian W Freudiger; Jay Reichman; C Michael Stanley; Gary R Holtom; X Sunney Xie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Biological imaging of chemical bonds by stimulated Raman scattering microscopy.

Authors:  Fanghao Hu; Lixue Shi; Wei Min
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Super-multiplex vibrational imaging.

Authors:  Lu Wei; Zhixing Chen; Lixue Shi; Rong Long; Andrew V Anzalone; Luyuan Zhang; Fanghao Hu; Rafael Yuste; Virginia W Cornish; Wei Min
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.