| Literature DB >> 33498370 |
Ariel Isaacs1, Zheyi Li2, Stacey T M Cheung1, Danushka K Wijesundara3, Christopher L D McMillan1, Naphak Modhiran1, Paul R Young1,3,4, Charani Ranasinghe2, Daniel Watterson1,4, Keith J Chappell1,3,4.
Abstract
Subunit vaccines exhibit favorable safety and immunogenicity profiles and can be designed to mimic native antigen structures. However, pairing with an appropriate adjuvant is imperative in order to elicit effective humoral and cellular immune responses. In this study, we aimed to determine an optimal adjuvant pairing with the prefusion form of influenza haemagglutinin (HA) or respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) fusion (F) subunit vaccines in BALB/c mice in order to inform future subunit vaccine adjuvant selection. We tested a panel of adjuvants, including aluminum hydroxide (alhydrogel), QS21, Addavax, Addavax with QS21 (AdQS21), and Army Liposome Formulation 55 with monophosphoryl lipid A and QS21 (ALF55). We found that all adjuvants elicited robust humoral responses in comparison to placebo, with the induction of potent neutralizing antibodies observed in all adjuvanted groups against influenza and in AdQS21, alhydrogel, and ALF55 against RSV. Upon HA vaccination, we observed that none of the adjuvants were able to significantly increase the frequency of CD4+ and CD8+ IFN-γ+ cells when compared to unadjuvanted antigen. The varying responses to antigens with each adjuvant highlights that those adjuvants most suited for pairing purposes can vary depending on the antigen used and/or the desired immune response. We therefore suggest that an adjuvant trial for different subunit vaccines in development would likely be necessary in preclinical studies.Entities:
Keywords: RSV; adjuvant; influenza; microbiology; vaccine; virology
Year: 2021 PMID: 33498370 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9020071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccines (Basel) ISSN: 2076-393X