Literature DB >> 33497402

Which companies dominate the packaged food supply of New Zealand and how healthy are their products?

Sally Mackay1, Helen Eyles1,2, Teresa Gontijo de Castro1, Leanne Young2, Cliona Ni Mhurchu2, Boyd Swinburn1.   

Abstract

Improvement of national food supplies are an opportunity to improve a country's health. Our aim was to identify the major food companies manufacturing packaged foods and non-alcoholic beverages available in New Zealand supermarkets in 2018; to assess the healthiness of products using (1) the Health Star Rating (HSR) system, (2) Australian Dietary Guidelines classification (core/discretionary), and (3) by level of processing; to compare the healthiness of products displaying and not displaying the HSR and; to assess potential for food reformulation within selected food sub-categories. Information on packaged foods was obtained from the Nutritrack supermarket database. Companies that manufactured each food and brand were identified using company websites and the New Zealand companies register. In total, 13,506 packaged products were mapped to 1,767 brands and 1,214 companies. Based on market share of products available for sale (Euromonitor data), there were 22 dominating companies producing 31% of products and 17% of brands. Fifty-nine percent of products were classified as unhealthy (HSR <3.5/5 stars), 53% as discretionary, and 69% as ultra-processed. Products displaying the HSR on the package had a higher mean HSR ±SD than if the HSR was not displayed (3.2±1.3 versus 2.5±1.4, p = 0.000). Efforts to improve the healthiness of products should be directed to the 22 food companies dominating this market share, particularly in the core foods groups which are currently less likely to meet Heart Foundation reformulation targets (bread, breakfast cereals, cheese, canned baked beans, yoghurt). The New Zealand supermarket packaged food supply included in the Nutritrack database is dominated by a small number of companies and is mostly unhealthy. Government leadership is required to improve the healthiness of the packaged food supply and provide adequate information to consumers. This includes interventions setting reformulation targets for core food groups, setting population nutrient intake targets and mandating that the HSR is displayed on all products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33497402      PMCID: PMC7837499          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  21 in total

1.  International collaborative project to compare and monitor the nutritional composition of processed foods.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dunford; Jacqui Webster; Adriana Blanco Metzler; Sebastien Czernichow; Cliona Ni Mhurchu; Petro Wolmarans; Wendy Snowdon; Mary L'Abbe; Nicole Li; Pallab K Maulik; Simon Barquera; Verónica Schoj; Lorena Allemandi; Norma Samman; Elizabete Wenzel de Menezes; Trevor Hassell; Johana Ortiz; Julieta Salazar de Ariza; A Rashid Rahman; Leticia de Núñez; Maria Reyes Garcia; Caroline van Rossum; Susanne Westenbrink; Lim Meng Thiam; Graham MacGregor; Bruce Neal
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 7.804

2.  Potential for improvement of population diet through reformulation of commonly eaten foods.

Authors:  Joop van Raaij; Marieke Hendriksen; Hans Verhagen
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Benchmarking the commitments related to population nutrition and obesity prevention of major food companies in New Zealand.

Authors:  Apurva Kasture; Stefanie Vandevijvere; Ella Robinson; Gary Sacks; Boyd Swinburn
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  The illusion of choice: an exploratory study looking at the top 10 food companies in Australia and their brand connections.

Authors:  Abbie-Clare Vidler; Melissa Stoneham; Melinda Edmunds; Ainslie Sartori
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.939

5.  Global trends in ultraprocessed food and drink product sales and their association with adult body mass index trajectories.

Authors:  Stefanie Vandevijvere; Lindsay M Jaacks; Carlos A Monteiro; Jean-Claude Moubarac; Martin Girling-Butcher; Arier C Lee; An Pan; James Bentham; Boyd Swinburn
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 9.213

6.  Effects of a Voluntary Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling System on Packaged Food Reformulation: The Health Star Rating System in New Zealand.

Authors:  Cliona Ni Mhurchu; Helen Eyles; Yeun-Hyang Choi
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Consumption of ultra-processed foods and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort.

Authors:  Thibault Fiolet; Bernard Srour; Laury Sellem; Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot; Benjamin Allès; Caroline Méjean; Mélanie Deschasaux; Philippine Fassier; Paule Latino-Martel; Marie Beslay; Serge Hercberg; Céline Lavalette; Carlos A Monteiro; Chantal Julia; Mathilde Touvier
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-02-14

8.  Ultra-processed food intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study (NutriNet-Santé).

Authors:  Bernard Srour; Léopold K Fezeu; Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot; Benjamin Allès; Caroline Méjean; Roland M Andrianasolo; Eloi Chazelas; Mélanie Deschasaux; Serge Hercberg; Pilar Galan; Carlos A Monteiro; Chantal Julia; Mathilde Touvier
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-05-29

9.  Ultra-Processed Foods: Definitions and Policy Issues.

Authors:  Michael J Gibney
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2018-09-14

10.  Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.