Literature DB >> 33496904

Comparison of photobiomodulation in the treatment of skin injury with an open wound in mice.

Ketlyn Germann Hendler1,2, Jaquelini Betta Canever1, Luana Gabriel de Souza1,2, Laís Mara Siqueira das Neves1, Marisa de Cássia Registro Fonseca3, Heloyse Uliam Kuriki1,2, Aderbal da Silva Aguiar Junior1,2, Rafael Inácio Barbosa1,2, Alexandre Marcio Marcolino4,5.   

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of photobiomodulation at a wavelength of 660 and 830 nm at different numbers of application points in the healing of open wounds in mice. In total, 120 mice were divided into 10 groups. The animals were submitted to cutaneous lesion of the open wound type (1.5 × 1.5 cm). Photobiomodulation at a wavelength of 660 and 830 nm and total energy of 3.6 J were used, applied at 1, 4, 5, and 9 points, for 14 days. The animals were subjected to analysis of the lesion area, skin temperature, and histological analysis. Macroscopic analysis results showed a difference (p < 0.05) between the irradiated groups and the sham group at 14 days PO. There was no statistical difference in skin temperature. Histological analysis findings showed better results for the epidermis thickness. Regarding the number of blood vessels, a difference was found between the 1- and 5-point 830-nm photobiomodulation groups and between the 4-point 660-nm group and the naive group. A significant difference in the number of fibroblasts was observed between the 830- and 660-nm photobiomodulation groups and the naive and sham groups. When comparing photobiomodulation wavelength, the 830-nm groups were more effective, and we emphasize the groups irradiated at 5 points, which showed an improvement in macroscopic analysis and epidermis thickness, an increase in the number of vessels, and a lower number of fibroblasts on the 14th day after skin injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healing; Histology; Injuries; Low-intensity laser therapy; Mice

Year:  2021        PMID: 33496904     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-020-03216-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  5 in total

1.  What is better in TRAM flap survival: LLLT single or multi-irradiation?

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Pinfildi; Bernardo S Hochman; Michele Akemi Nishioka; Tatiana Rodrigues Sheliga; Marco Aurélio Invaldi Neves; Richard Eloin Liebano; Lydia Masako Ferreira
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Comparison of two different laser photobiomodulation protocols on the viability of random skin flap in rats.

Authors:  Cintia Cristina Santi Martignago; C R Tim; L Assis; L M G Neves; P S Bossini; A C Renno; L R S Avo; R E Liebano; N A Parizotto
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 3.  Biostimulation effects of low-power laser in the repair process.

Authors:  Ruthinéia Diógenes Alves Uchôa Lins; Euler Maciel Dantas; Keila Cristina Raposo Lucena; Maria Helena Chaves Vasconcelos Catão; Ana Flávia Granville-Garcia; Luiz Guedes Carvalho Neto
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.896

4.  Effect of gallium-arsenide laser, gallium-aluminum-arsenide laser and healing ointment on cutaneous wound healing in Wistar rats.

Authors:  R V Gonçalves; J M S Mezêncio; G P Benevides; S L P Matta; C A Neves; M M Sarandy; E F Vilela
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.590

5.  [Stability of cobamamide in pharmaceutical preparations].

Authors:  G Bertellini
Journal:  Boll Chim Farm       Date:  1970-02
  5 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of electrophysical agents for treating pressure injuries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aline Santos Vieceli; Juruciara Cristiano Martins; Ketlyn Germann Hendler; Ana Paula Tavares Santos; Lais Mara Siqueira das Neves; Rafael Inacio Barbosa; Heloyse Uliam Kuriki; Alexandre Marcio Marcolino
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 2.555

Review 2.  Application of Fibrin Associated with Photobiomodulation as a Promising Strategy to Improve Regeneration in Tissue Engineering: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carlos Henrique Bertoni Reis; Daniela Vieira Buchaim; Adriana de Cássia Ortiz; Simone Ortiz Moura Fideles; Jefferson Aparecido Dias; Maria Angelica Miglino; Daniel de Bortoli Teixeira; Eliana de Souza Bastos Mazuqueli Pereira; Marcelo Rodrigues da Cunha; Rogerio Leone Buchaim
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.967

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.