Literature DB >> 33496877

Dobutamine-sparing versus dobutamine-to-all strategy in cardiac surgery: a randomized noninferiority trial.

Rafael Alves Franco1, Juliano Pinheiro de Almeida1, Giovanni Landoni2,3, Thomas W L Scheeren4, Filomena Regina Barbosa Gomes Galas5, Julia Tizue Fukushima1, Suely Zefferino5, Pasquale Nardelli2, Marilde de Albuquerque Piccioni5, Elisandra Cristina Trevisan Calvo Arita6, Clarice Hyesuk Lee Park1, Ligia Cristina Camara Cunha6, Gisele Queiroz de Oliveira1, Isabela Bispo Santos da Silva Costa1, Roberto Kalil Filho7, Fabio Biscegli Jatene6, Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The detrimental effects of inotropes are well-known, and in many fields they are only used within a goal-directed therapy approach. Nevertheless, standard management in many centers includes administering inotropes to all patients undergoing cardiac surgery to prevent low cardiac output syndrome and its implications. Randomized evidence in favor of a patient-tailored, inotrope-sparing approach is still lacking. We designed a randomized controlled noninferiority trial in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with normal ejection fraction to assess whether an dobutamine-sparing strategy (in which the use of dobutamine was guided by hemodynamic evidence of low cardiac output associated with signs of inadequate tissue perfusion) was noninferior to an inotrope-to-all strategy (in which all patients received dobutamine).
RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were randomized to the dobutamine-sparing strategy (80 patients) or to the dobutamine-to-all approach (80 patients). The primary composite endpoint of 30-day mortality or occurrence of major cardiovascular complications (arrhythmias, acute myocardial infarction, low cardiac output syndrome and stroke or transient ischemic attack) occurred in 25/80 (31%) patients of the dobutamine-sparing group (p = 0.74) and 27/80 (34%) of the dobutamine-to-all group. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the incidence of acute kidney injury, prolonged mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit or hospital length of stay. DISCUSSION: Although it is common practice in many centers to administer inotropes to all patients undergoing cardiac surgery, a dobutamine-sparing strategy did not result in an increase of mortality or occurrence of major cardiovascular events when compared to a dobutamine-to-all strategy. Further research is needed to assess if reducing the administration of inotropes can improve outcomes in cardiac surgery. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02361801. Registered Feb 2nd, 2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02361801.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac surgery; Dobutamine; Goal-directed therapy; Inotrope sparing; Inotropes; Low cardiac output syndrome; Major cardiovascular events; Mortality; Randomized clinical trial

Year:  2021        PMID: 33496877      PMCID: PMC7838231          DOI: 10.1186/s13613-021-00808-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intensive Care        ISSN: 2110-5820            Impact factor:   6.925


  2 in total

1.  Dobutamine-sparing strategy in managing patients with impaired ejection fraction undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: less is more?

Authors:  Xiao-Ming Lin; Ming-Hao Luo; Jing-Chao Luo; Kanhua Yin; Ying Zhang; Xiao-Mei Yang; Zhe Luo; Guo-Wei Tu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Strategies for post-cardiac surgery acute kidney injury prevention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jia-Jin Chen; Tao Han Lee; George Kuo; Yen-Ta Huang; Pei-Rung Chen; Shao-Wei Chen; Huang-Yu Yang; Hsiang-Hao Hsu; Ching-Chung Hsiao; Chia-Hung Yang; Cheng-Chia Lee; Yung-Chang Chen; Chih-Hsiang Chang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.