Sarvenaz Vandyousefi1, Jaimie N Davis2, Erica P Gunderson3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Sarvenaz.Vandyousefi@nyulangone.org. 2. Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Dell Pediatrics Research Institute, Austin, TX, USA. 3. Division of Research, Cardiovascular and Metabolic Conditions Section, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESES: This longitudinal analysis evaluated the independent and joint associations of any breastfeeding (BF) or exclusive BF (EBF) and intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and 100% fruit juice from birth to 1 year with subsequent overweight and obesity among young children exposed to gestational diabetes (GDM). METHODS: The analysis utilised prospectively collected data from participants enrolled in the Study of Women, Infant Feeding and Type 2 Diabetes after GDM (SWIFT); 1035 pregnant women (20-45 years) diagnosed with GDM, of whom 75% were of Black, Hispanic or Asian race and ethnicity. Mother-infant dyad characteristics and infant dietary intake were assessed via research protocols at in-person examinations, telephone interviews and monthly mailed surveys from birth to 1 year. Child weight, length and height were obtained from electronic health records at birth (2008-2011) and ages 2-5 years (2010-2016) to classify BMI percentile groups (n = 835). RESULTS: Adequate BF (≥6 months), adequate EBF duration (≥6 months), and SSB and 100% fruit juice intake in the first year were independently associated with child obesity at ages 2-5 years (all p < 0.05). Compared with children with adequate EBF and no intake of SSB or 100% fruit juice, those with adequate EBF and intake of 100% fruit juice and/or SSBs had a four- to fivefold higher odds of obesity (aOR 4.2, 95% CI:1.6, 11.2 for 100% fruit juice; aOR 4.5, 95% CI:1.4, 8.5 for fruit juice or SSBs; and aOR 4.7, 95% CI:1.4, 15 for SSBs; all p < 0.01), while those with inadequate EBF (<6 months) and intake of 100% fruit juice and/or SSBs had a six- to 12-fold higher odds of obesity (aOR 6.4, 95% CI:2.4, 17.2 for fruit juice; aOR 6.6, 95% CI:2.7, 14.8 for fruit juice or SSBs; and aOR 12.2, 95% CI:4.3, 25 for SSBs; all p < 0.001). Compared with children with adequate BF and no intake of SSB or 100% fruit juice, those with adequate BF and intake of 100% fruit juice and/or SSBs had a threefold higher odds of obesity (aOR 3.1, 95% CI:1.1, 7.3 for fruit juice; aOR 3.3, 95% CI:1.3, 8.3 for fruit juice or SSBs; and aOR 3.4, 95% CI:1.3, 8.5 for SSBs; all p < 0.05), while those with inadequate BF (<6 months) and intake of 100% fruit juice and/or SSB were associated with five- to tenfold higher odds of obesity (aOR 4.8, 95% CI:2.3, 12.2 for fruit juice; aOR 6.0, 95% CI:2.5, 12.8 for fruit juice or SSBs; aOR 9.5, 95% CI:3.7, 15.1 for SSBs; all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: This is the first study to prospectively evaluate the relation of BF or EBF duration and intake of SSB and 100% fruit juice during the first year of life with subsequent obesity in children exposed to GDM. Adequate BF or EBF combined with avoidance of SSB and 100% fruit juice during early infancy may ameliorate future child obesity in this high-risk population.
AIMS/HYPOTHESES: This longitudinal analysis evaluated the independent and joint associations of any breastfeeding (BF) or exclusive BF (EBF) and intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and 100% fruit juice from birth to 1 year with subsequent overweight and obesity among young children exposed to gestational diabetes (GDM). METHODS: The analysis utilised prospectively collected data from participants enrolled in the Study of Women, Infant Feeding and Type 2 Diabetes after GDM (SWIFT); 1035 pregnant women (20-45 years) diagnosed with GDM, of whom 75% were of Black, Hispanic or Asian race and ethnicity. Mother-infant dyad characteristics and infant dietary intake were assessed via research protocols at in-person examinations, telephone interviews and monthly mailed surveys from birth to 1 year. Child weight, length and height were obtained from electronic health records at birth (2008-2011) and ages 2-5 years (2010-2016) to classify BMI percentile groups (n = 835). RESULTS: Adequate BF (≥6 months), adequate EBF duration (≥6 months), and SSB and 100% fruit juice intake in the first year were independently associated with child obesity at ages 2-5 years (all p < 0.05). Compared with children with adequate EBF and no intake of SSB or 100% fruit juice, those with adequate EBF and intake of 100% fruit juice and/or SSBs had a four- to fivefold higher odds of obesity (aOR 4.2, 95% CI:1.6, 11.2 for 100% fruit juice; aOR 4.5, 95% CI:1.4, 8.5 for fruit juice or SSBs; and aOR 4.7, 95% CI:1.4, 15 for SSBs; all p < 0.01), while those with inadequate EBF (<6 months) and intake of 100% fruit juice and/or SSBs had a six- to 12-fold higher odds of obesity (aOR 6.4, 95% CI:2.4, 17.2 for fruit juice; aOR 6.6, 95% CI:2.7, 14.8 for fruit juice or SSBs; and aOR 12.2, 95% CI:4.3, 25 for SSBs; all p < 0.001). Compared with children with adequate BF and no intake of SSB or 100% fruit juice, those with adequate BF and intake of 100% fruit juice and/or SSBs had a threefold higher odds of obesity (aOR 3.1, 95% CI:1.1, 7.3 for fruit juice; aOR 3.3, 95% CI:1.3, 8.3 for fruit juice or SSBs; and aOR 3.4, 95% CI:1.3, 8.5 for SSBs; all p < 0.05), while those with inadequate BF (<6 months) and intake of 100% fruit juice and/or SSB were associated with five- to tenfold higher odds of obesity (aOR 4.8, 95% CI:2.3, 12.2 for fruit juice; aOR 6.0, 95% CI:2.5, 12.8 for fruit juice or SSBs; aOR 9.5, 95% CI:3.7, 15.1 for SSBs; all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: This is the first study to prospectively evaluate the relation of BF or EBF duration and intake of SSB and 100% fruit juice during the first year of life with subsequent obesity in children exposed to GDM. Adequate BF or EBF combined with avoidance of SSB and 100% fruit juice during early infancy may ameliorate future child obesity in this high-risk population.
Authors: Myles S Faith; James B Hittner; Shanta R Hurston; Jie Yin; Louise C Greenspan; Charles P Quesenberry; Erica P Gunderson Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Kristi Crowe-White; Carol E O'Neil; J Scott Parrott; Sue Benson-Davies; Elizabeth Droke; Melissa Gutschall; Kim S Stote; Taylor Wolfram; Paula Ziegler Journal: Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr Date: 2016 Impact factor: 11.176
Authors: Z Bider-Canfield; M P Martinez; X Wang; W Yu; M P Bautista; J Brookey; K A Page; T A Buchanan; A H Xiang Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Tessa L Crume; Lorraine Ogden; MaryBeth Maligie; Shelly Sheffield; Kimberly J Bischoff; Robert McDuffie; Stephen Daniels; Richard F Hamman; Jill M Norris; Dana Dabelea Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Ziyi Zhang; Anthony L Piro; Amina Allalou; Stacey E Alexeeff; Feihan F Dai; Erica P Gunderson; Michael B Wheeler Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2022-08-18 Impact factor: 6.134
Authors: Yi Ying Ong; Wei Wei Pang; Jonathan Y Huang; Izzuddin M Aris; Suresh Anand Sadananthan; Mya-Thway Tint; Wen Lun Yuan; Ling-Wei Chen; Yiong Huak Chan; Neerja Karnani; S Sendhil Velan; Marielle V Fortier; Jonathan Choo; Lieng Hsi Ling; Lynette Shek; Kok Hian Tan; Peter D Gluckman; Fabian Yap; Yap-Seng Chong; Keith M Godfrey; Mary F-F Chong; Shiao-Yng Chan; Johan G Eriksson; Mary E Wlodek; Yung Seng Lee; Navin Michael Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2022-02-06 Impact factor: 4.865