Becker M Al-Khayatt1, Justin D Salciccioli2, Dominic C Marshall3, Andrew D Krahn4, Joseph Shalhoub5,6, Markus B Sikkel4,7,8. 1. Cardiothoracic Intensive Care, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, St George's University Hospital, 1st Floor, Atkinson Morley Wing, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, UK. 2. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK. 4. Division of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. 5. Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. 6. Academic Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. 7. Royal Jubilee Hospital, Vancouver, Canada. 8. Division of Medical Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of this study was to understand the changing trends in atrial fibrillation (AF) incidence and mortality across Europe from 1990 to 2017, and how socioeconomic factors and sex differences play a role. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a temporal analysis of data from the 2017 Global Burden of Disease Database for 20 countries across Europe using Joinpoint regression analysis. Age-adjusted incidence, mortality, and mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs) to approximate case fatality rate are presented. Incidence and mortality trends were heterogenous throughout Europe, with Austria, Denmark, and Sweden experiencing peaks in incidence in the middle of the study period. Mortality rates were higher in wealthier countries with the highest being Sweden for both men and women (8.83 and 8.88 per 100 000, respectively) in 2017. MIRs were higher in women in all countries studied, with the disparity increasing the most over time in Germany (43.6% higher in women vs. men in 1990 to 74.5% higher in women in 2017). CONCLUSION: AF incidence and mortality across Europe did not show a general trend, but unique patterns for some nations were observed. Higher mortality rates were observed in wealthier countries, potentially secondary to a survivor effect where patients survive long enough to suffer from AF and its complications. Outcomes for women with AF were worse than men, represented by higher MIRs. This suggests that there is widespread healthcare inequality between the sexes across Europe, or that there are biological differences between them in terms of their risk of adverse outcomes from AF. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to understand the changing trends in atrial fibrillation (AF) incidence and mortality across Europe from 1990 to 2017, and how socioeconomic factors and sex differences play a role. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a temporal analysis of data from the 2017 Global Burden of Disease Database for 20 countries across Europe using Joinpoint regression analysis. Age-adjusted incidence, mortality, and mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs) to approximate case fatality rate are presented. Incidence and mortality trends were heterogenous throughout Europe, with Austria, Denmark, and Sweden experiencing peaks in incidence in the middle of the study period. Mortality rates were higher in wealthier countries with the highest being Sweden for both men and women (8.83 and 8.88 per 100 000, respectively) in 2017. MIRs were higher in women in all countries studied, with the disparity increasing the most over time in Germany (43.6% higher in women vs. men in 1990 to 74.5% higher in women in 2017). CONCLUSION:AF incidence and mortality across Europe did not show a general trend, but unique patterns for some nations were observed. Higher mortality rates were observed in wealthier countries, potentially secondary to a survivor effect where patients survive long enough to suffer from AF and its complications. Outcomes for women with AF were worse than men, represented by higher MIRs. This suggests that there is widespread healthcare inequality between the sexes across Europe, or that there are biological differences between them in terms of their risk of adverse outcomes from AF. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.