How human thermal plume influences near-human transport of respiratory droplets and airborne particles: a review.

With mounting evidence and notable cases of large clustered infections, airborne transmission via droplets and particles has been recently acknowledged as an effective mode of transmission for COVID-19. How droplets and aerosol particles disperse are being transported into the human breathing zone-the last few inches for airborne transmission to effectuate-remains a key question which has been widely overlooked. Human thermal plume refers to the constantly rising airflows around the boundary layer of human body due to persisting temperature gradients between the body surfaces and the ambient air. Ample evidence indicated that the thermal plume controls the dispersion and transport of aerosols in the human microenvironment. Given that in calm indoor environments most air inhaled by human comes from the boundary layer where thermal plume flows through constantly, the role of thermal plume needs to be scrutinized to predict the diffusion of droplets, aerosols and other airborne carriers of the novel coronavirus around the human body for prioritizing infection control strategies. Here, we assessed the potential influences of the thermal plume on the transmission of COVID-19 and other airborne pathogens by reviewing the most pertinent evidence and analyzing key variables in the formation of thermal plume in indoor environments, e.g., ambient temperature, human posture and type of clothing. Our reviewed evidence and data indicate that the human thermal plume should facilitate the airborne transmission of COVID-19 in enclosed spaces by elevating small droplets and airborne particles into the breathing zone from lower regions and ascending respiratory droplets from the sources into the upper atmosphere. By drawing attention to aerosol transport dynamics in the human microenvironment, these insights may be useful for understanding COVID-19 transmission in enclosed spaces, especially those intended for public use.

Introduction

Since early in the pandemic, airborne transmission has generated much debate. On October 5, 2020, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated their guidance and for the first time, acknowledged airborne transmission via small droplets and particles as an effective route of virus spread during the current pandemic (CDC 2020a). Developing a better understanding of near-human transport of virus-laden droplets and aerosol particles is the key to control human infections via this particular transmission route. In this domain, current studies and regulatory guidelines have largely focused on the macro aspects, e.g., requirements on a social distance of at least six feet and restrictions on using air conditioning and circulation in buildings, to prevent the spread of the virus via airborne routes (US EPA 2020a, 2020b; WHO 2020a). Yet, how these droplets and particles disperse and being transported into the human microenvironment—the last few inches for airborne transmission to effectuate—is an urgent question that has not been brought up in recent studies, scholarly discussions or risk assessments (CDC 2020a; WHO 2020b, 2020c).

Along with this gap is the fact that most of our inhaled air comes from the human boundary layer in calm indoor environments (Clark and Cox 1973; Craven and Settles 2006; Melikov 2015; Zhu et al. 2005). As an essential part of the human microenvironment, thermal plume has dominant influences on airflows in the boundary layer and around the human body, affecting the diffusion, transport and inhalation of atmospheric particulates and pollutants therein (Ansaripour et al. 2016; Craven and Settles 2006; Melikov 2015; Vianello et al. 2019; Yang et al. 2015). While there has been no systematic study on human thermal plume in the COVID-19 context, an existing body of evidence suggests that it generates constant uprising airflows around the human body and transports aerosols from lower regions into the breathing zone. In the meantime, HTP intercepts respiratory droplets from the source and ascends them along the human boundary layer into the upper atmosphere (Vianello et al. 2019; Yan et al. 2019). Given the fact that air inhaled by indoor occupants often comes from the boundary layer where the thermal plume flows through constantly, it is imperative to scrutinize its role in effectuating the transmission of COVID-19 in the human microenvironment.

In this article, we discuss the underlying influences of human thermal plume on the transmission of airborne pathogens by gathering the most pertinent evidence and analyzing the key characteristics and influencing factors of thermal plume formed in indoor environments. By focusing on thermal plume-induced airflows and resultant aerosol transport in and out from the human microenvironment (Fig. 1), we highlight this issue as an important knowledge gap in current understanding of airborne transmission of COVID-19. Specifically, our discussions revolve the following topics: (1) the evolving understanding on the airborne transmission of COVID-19 and the impact of airborne particles, (2) the formation and characteristics of thermal plume and key influencing factors, (3) the influences of thermal plume on the diffusion and transport of indoor aerosols as potential virus carriers in the human microenvironment and (4) practical strategies for indoor occupants, especially those with a sedentary lifestyle, to mitigate the risk of inhaling virus-laden droplets and particles rising from the floors or lower regions in indoor environments.

Fig. 1

Potential influences of human thermal plumes on airborne transmission of COVID-19

Transmission of COVID-19 by virus-laden droplets and indoor aerosols

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causation agent of the current COVID-19 pandemic, is primarily transmitted via respiratory droplets, contact surfaces (Han et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2020a) and fecal routes (Sun and Han 2020a), the former being generated by human respiratory activities such as coughing, sneezing and talking (WHO 2020b). Recently, researchers began to realize that airborne transmission played an essential role in several large clustered infections of COVID-19 (Lewis 2020). Meanwhile, studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 virus-laden aerosol particles remained infectious for hours under the room temperature (van Doremalen et al. 2020; Fears et al. 2020). On July 6, 2020, Morawska et al. (2020) published an open commentary with signatories of 237 researchers, calling for immediate regulatory actions to mitigate the risks of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. The World Health Organization (WHO) subsequently published a scientific brief to raise public awareness and to highlight current knowledge gaps on this issue (WHO 2020a). Three months later, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) acknowledged the importance of airborne transmission in the current spread of the novel coronavirus (CDC 2020a). The risks of SARS-CoV-2 transmission via aerosols have been evaluated in high-risk settings, including correctional and detention facilities (CDC 2020b), public toilets (Sun and Han 2020b) and lactation rooms (Wang et al. 2020b).

A national survey in the USA showed that on average, people spent over 80% of their time in various types of indoor spaces (Klepeis et al. 2001). Recent surveys indicated a consistent rise of sedentary lifestyles in the general population (ACC 2019; Gong et al. 2019). It is thus of particular importance to understand the dispersion, transport and deposition of respiratory droplets and associated aerosol particles in these environments for infection prevention and control. In this domain, studies have shown that the trajectories of respiratory droplets were dominated by droplet size and ambient airflows (Feng et al. 2020; Mittal et al. 2020; Wei and Li 2016). Specifically, when an individual coughs or talks, droplets are expelled from the source with a wide range of size distribution from 0.1 to 1000 μm (Chao et al. 2009; Wells 1934; Yang et al. 2007). Due to gravitational settling, large droplets (e.g.,  > 100 μm) would rapidly settle on the floor in a few seconds (Wei and Li 2015). Small droplets and microdroplets (< 30 μm), which represent the majority of droplets generated by human coughs, speeches and breaths (Chao et al. 2009; Duguid 1946; Yang et al. 2007; Rapineni and Rosenthal 1997), would remain suspended in the atmosphere while being quickly evaporated into droplet nuclei (Morawska 2006), where their motions are dominated by airflows rather than gravity or inertia (Morawska et al. 2020; Zhu et al. 2006).

Further, recent studies indicated that high concentrations of aerosol particles could significantly increase the susceptibility of COVID-19 infection and symptom aggravation in infected individuals (Accarino et al. 2020; Fattorini et al. 2020; Roviello et al. 2020; Travaglio et al. 2020). A known contributing factor is that airborne particles are capable of harboring pathogens by forming clusters with droplets and droplet nuclei and facilitate their long-distance transport (Alonso et al. 2014; Zhao et al. 2019). Recent findings on virus-laden atmospheric fine particulates in Northern Italy, an area burdened with air pollution, supported this hypothesis (Paital et al. 2020; Setti et al. 2020a, 2020b). In indoor environments, various types of human activities (e.g., smoking, cooking, laser printing and incense burning) can emit abundant quantities of aerosol particles, which can stay airborne for long periods of time while acting as potential carriers for airborne pathogens (Mahabee-Gittens et al. 2020; Qu et al. 2020; Tang et al. 2020). Overall, considering people spend most of their time in various indoor spaces, it is of importance to investigate and evaluate the factors for the dispersion and transport of small droplets, droplet nuclei and other emitted aerosol particles.

Human thermal plume: Formation, characteristics and influencing factors

As part of the thermoregulation process, the human body is constantly exchanging metabolic heat with the surrounding air (Craven and Settles 2006). For thermal comfort, indoor temperature is generally recommended to be within 20–27 °C (CDC 2015), which is approximately 7–13 °C lower than the normal skin temperature of human body (Licina et al. 2014). The persistence of a body-to-air temperature gradient creates constant heat exchange and directional airflows, often referred to as human thermal plume, that are going upwards due to the thermal buoyancy effect (Fig. 2). In a typical indoor environment with a calm atmosphere, thermal plume plays an essential role in transporting aerosols in the human microenvironment. For an adult person in a standing position, the thermal plume starts as a laminar flow from the lower part of the body and rises along the body boundary layer. The uprising laminar flow gradually increases in thickness and velocity and finally converts to a turbulent flow. As an indicative range, the thickness of the thermal plume generally increases from 2 to 4 mm at a person’s knee and thigh to approximately 20 cm at chest level (Koelblen et al. 2015) and then reaches a maximum velocity of 0.2–0.3 m/s about 50 cm above the person’s head (Wei and Li 2016). To put it into perspective, the maximum mean air velocity is approximately 0.1–0.2 m/s for spaces in various types of building with mixed ventilation (i.e., 40% turbulence intensity), according to the current design criteria by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 2005).

Fig. 2

Schlieren image of simulated human thermal plume in front view, captured using a single-mirror coincident schlieren system. (a) A thermal manikin with a similar skin temperature to human was used to simulate the heat release from human body in the upright sitting posture. (b) A vertical-knife-edge schlieren image of the thermal plume generated on the thermal manikin. Reprinted with permission of Springer from Gena et al. (Gena et al. 2020)

There are various human and environmental factors influencing the intensity and geometry of human thermal plume, including the air temperature, body posture and type of clothing (Koelblen et al. 2015). Previous studies showed that higher temperature gradients between the human body and ambient air could significantly increase the intensity of thermal plume generated (Feng et al. 2020; Voelker et al. 2014). For instance, when the ambient air temperature decreased from 26 to 20 °C (still in the comfort range), the peak velocity of thermal plume around a seated adult increased by about 50% (i.e., from 0.16 to 0.24 m/s) (Licina et al. 2014). The human body posture also has a significant impact on the thermal plume generated around a person in a given environment. For indoor occupants with a sedentary lifestyle, local heat convection will be enhanced by extra air streams from legs and thighs, resulting in a much wider and more intense thermal plume around the body (Licina et al. 2014). On the other hand, the velocities of thermal plume generated by lying occupants were found to be lower than those of a standing or sitting position due to a shortage of convection accumulation (Feng et al. 2020). Licina et al. (2014) assessed the impact of clothing on thermal plume formation using a thermal manikin dressed with different types of clothing. The study found that loose clothing could considerably reduce the intensity of thermal plume because of the thermal insulation effect. Specifically, loose clothing caused a 40% reduction in the maximum velocity of the thermal plume in the manikin’s breathing zone compared with the bare skin scenario, due to physical barriers created by folds and collar in addition to the thermal insulation effect. Also, wearing a wig on the bald manikin reduced about 10% of the maximum velocity of the thermal plume in the facial region. Overall, existing evidence shows that thermal plume is capable of influencing the dispersion and transport of indoor aerosols in the human boundary layer. The characteristics of human thermal plume depend on various factors including ambient temperature, human posture and type of clothing worn on the concerned individual in a given environment (Table 1).

Table 1

Data and findings on the formation of human thermal plume and its influences on the dispersion and transport of droplets and airborne particles in simulated and actual environments

Objectives	Subject	Methods	Key data and findings	References
Qualitative and quantitative research on human thermal plume	Human volunteers	Particle image velocimetry, computational fluid dynamics	Human thermal plume reached a maximum velocity of 0.24 m/s at 0.42 m above the head height. An approximately linear growth of plume flow rate with height was observed	Craven and Settles (2006)
Studying the effects of human thermal plume on indoor airflows and particle transport	Simulation	Computational fluid dynamics	Buoyancy driven by human thermal plume significantly pulled airflows from floor ventilation inlet toward the human body and altered the flow trajectories of airborne particles	Salmanzadeh et al. (2012)
Evaluation of key variables in the intensity of human thermal plume	Thermal manikin	Dressing a thermal human manikin with various types of clothing under different conditions	Increasing the ambient temperature could decrease the intensity of the human thermal plume. Long and loose clothing could reduce its velocity	Licina et al. (2014)
Studying the influences of human thermal plume on particle transport and distribution after emitted by a laser printer in a ventilated room	Simulation	Computational fluid dynamics	Particle concentrations were significantly higher near the breathing zone under the influence of thermal plume	Ansaripour et al. (2016)
Investigating the interactions between human thermal plume and cough flow	Simulation	Computational fluid dynamics	Human thermal plume could ascend the cough flow and elevate the droplets into upper atmosphere along the human boundary layer	Yan et al. (2019)
Investigation of human exposure to indoor airborne microplastics	Thermal manikin	Using a breathing thermal manikin to simulate human respiration	Thermal plume continuously transported microplastics from lower regions of the room into the breathing zone of the sedentary manikin	Vianello et al. (2019)
Analyzing airborne transmission of expiratory droplets in a coach bus environment	Simulation	Computational fluid dynamics	Gravity, ventilation flows and upward body thermal plumes had concurrent effects on the dispersion and final deposition of the droplets generated by seated passengers in the coach bus	Yang et al. (2020)

Influences of human thermal plumes on transmission of airborne pathogens in the human microenvironment: Evidence and knowledge gaps

Being a constant source of directional airflows and thermal buoyancy, human thermal plume has a significant impact in the diffusion and transport of volatile compounds, aerosols and other airborne matter in the human microenvironment. Vianello et al. (2019) utilized a breathing thermal manikin with respiratory patterns and metabolic heat similar to those of adult males to assess the influences of thermal plume on the human inhalation of indoor microplastics. The study found that thermal plume continuously transported microplastics from lower regions of the room into the breathing zone of the sedentary manikin. In an earlier study, Craven and Settles (2006) also pointed out that thermal plume played a major role in transporting exfoliated human skin scales ranging from submicrometer sizes to 50 μm to the human breathing zone and further into the indoor air. Under the constant uprising airflows, the vertical transport and human inhalation of indoor aerosols would be particularly enhanced when the emission source is located at lower horizons in proximity to the human occupant (Rim et al. 2009). Salmanzadeh et al. (2012) demonstrated that flows released by an inlet register set on the floor were pulled strongly by the thermal plume toward the human occupant up to the breathing zone and then rising above the person’s head (Fig. 3). Similar results were reported by Ansaripour et al. (2016) where researchers simulated human exposure to fine particles emitted from a desktop-level laser printer in a room with displacement ventilation operating at an inlet velocity of 0.2 m/s. The study found that compared with the unheated one, the heated manikin (32 °C) was exposed to substantially larger quantities of printer emission particles within 25–130 s after the printing started, both in the breathing zone and around the entire upper body of the seated manikin (Fig. 4). To summarize, there is ample evidence indicating that thermal plume creates constant uprising airflows around the human body and therefore has the ability to transport abundant quantities of airborne droplets and particles from lower regions to the human breathing zone.

Fig. 3

Comparison on the trajectories of airflows generated by an inlet register installed on the floor in a cubicle (1.8 m × 2.4 m × 2.4 m, inlet velocity at 0.2 m/s). (a) Unheated manikin showed no disturbance on flow trajectory. (b) Thermal plume generated by the heated manikin (32.2 °C) pulled the flow toward its body, dramatically altering its trajectory in the cubicle. Compared with the unheated scenario, a significant portion of the flow reached the breathing zone of the heated manikin and passed through its head. Reprinted with permission of Elsevier from Salmanzadeh et al. (Salmanzadeh et al. 2012)

Fig. 4

Dynamic distribution of particles emitted by a desktop-level laser printer in a cubicle with a displacement ventilation system operating at an inlet velocity of 0.2 m/s. Images above show particle distributions in ambient air at different time intervals around the unheated and heated manikin (32.2 °C). Heating significantly enhanced the transport and accumulation of printer emission particles in the breathing region and around the upper body of the manikin. Reprinted with permission of Elsevier from Ansaripour et al. (Ansaripour et al. 2016)

Although there has been no systematic study in the context of COVID-19, studies have shown that human thermal plume can be an important confounding factor in the transmission of airborne pathogens, given the fact that in a calm indoor atmosphere, most inhaled air comes from the body’s boundary layer where thermal plume flows through constantly and transports aerosols and other airborne particles to and from (Clark and Cox 1973; Craven and Settles 2006; Melikov 2015; Zhu et al. 2005). Yan et al. (2019) investigated the interactions between the thermal plume and human cough flows using computational fluid dynamic methods. At the beginning, the cough flow maintained its initial shape and trajectory due to its high jet velocity exiting the source (Fig. 5a). In a few seconds, the flow became substantially weaker and was subsequently ascended by the thermal plume on the sedentary individual. A significant portion of the cough flow was elevated to the upper horizons and accumulated in the air under the influence of thermal plume, which would otherwise remain at lower positions or quickly settle on the floor (Fig. 5b).

Fig. 5

Impact of human thermal plume on the moving trajectory of a cough flow. (a) Cough flow mixed into the existing human thermal plume at a high jet velocity (22 m/s). The latter would ascend droplets into the upper regions, after the cough flow became weakened at 0.6 s following its expulsion from the mouth. (b) Comparison on the spatial distribution of droplets with unheated and heated manikin after coughing. Without body heat, cough flow maintained its trajectory and descended within 1–4 s. Heating of the manikin caused a temperature difference of 5.8 °C between its surface and ambient air (25 °C). Cough flow was ascended by human thermal plume in the latter scenario where all droplets maintained buoyancy with a significant portion elevated to levels near or above the breathing zone of the sedentary manikin. Reprinted with permission of Elsevier from Yan et al. (Yan et al. 2019)

There are still questions regarding the influences of different ventilation systems on the human thermal plume in building environments (Ge et al. 2013; Yang et al. 2015). Unidirectional airflows induced by mechanical or natural ventilation, such as opening window or using air conditioning, may affect the thermal plume flow direction and geometry. For instance, displacement ventilation and underfloor air distribution often drive the indoor air to move from the floor to the outlet, which can reduce the accumulation and thickness of the thermal plume, while at the same time increase its velocity. For sedentary occupants in enclosed spaces, thermal plume often has a significant and persistent influence on the transport of respiratory droplets and airborne particles, despite the co-existing influences of ventilation. This was demonstrated in a recent study where researchers simulated the transport of expiratory droplets with initial sizes of 10 and 50 μm in a coach bus environment (Yang et al. 2020). The study showed that gravity, ventilation flows and upward body thermal plumes had concurrent effects on the dispersion and final deposition of the droplets generated by seated passengers in the enclosed environment. Similar findings were reported in other studies where thermal plume showed significant influences on the transport of airflows and airborne particles in various indoor environments with mechanical ventilation in operation (Ansaripour et al. 2016; Bivolarova et al. 2017; Salmanzadeh et al. 2012).

Regarding airborne transmission of COVID-19, current studies and risk mitigation efforts have emphasized on the influences of macroenvironments, such as maintaining adequate social distancing and natural ventilation in public spaces, to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 through air (Amoatey et al. 2020; Fang et al. 2020; Lu et al. 2020; US EPA 2020b). Contrastingly, few studies examined how the inhalation process actually proceeds in the human microenvironment (e.g., airflows and aerosols moving toward and through the human breathing zone) and what dominant factors are present therein. Specifically, the significant influences of human thermal plume on the aerosol transport dynamics in the human boundary layer have been barely mentioned in recent studies and scholarly discussions revolving COVID-19. Meanwhile, persisting situations from the current pandemic are posing unprecedented challenges for infection prevention and control, particularly with respect to the airborne transmission route, in enclosed public spaces with high occupancy or foot traffic. In light of this knowledge gap, it is imperative to scrutinize the human microenvironment, including the role of thermal plume in effectuating the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in various indoor environments, to add to the current understanding of airborne transmission through virus-laden droplets and particles.

Before we attain a solid understanding on this matter, several precautionary measures may be worth considering to mitigate the risks of inhaling virus-laden droplets and particles rising from the floors and lower regions of the indoor atmosphere under the constant uprising airflows induced by human thermal plume. Where practical, removing carpeting and keeping floors clean and disinfected, eliminating sources of indoor aerosol emissions (e.g., tobacco smoking, laser printing), maintaining adequate natural ventilation to reduce aerosol accumulation (Gennaro et al. 2014) and using air purification methods (Fahri et al. 2020; Gopinath et al. 2018) would all be effective methods to mitigate such risks. For sedentary individuals, moving their body closer to desk can partly block the uprising thermal plume and reduce its velocity entering the breathing zone (Melikov 2015; Licina et al. 2014). Lastly, wearing long and loose clothing also reduces the magnitude of thermal plume generated on the person in a given environment, compared with wearing tight clothing or exposing bare skins. To conclude, existing evidence suggests that human thermal plume may play an important role in the airborne transmission of COVID-19 and other pathogens in calm indoor environments, despite the current knowledge gaps. Meanwhile, precautionary measures could be taken to mitigate the underlying risks, such as reducing indoor particle emissions, increasing natural ventilation and dressing long and loose clothing to reduce the intensity and effects of human thermal plume.

Conclusion

A question raised in earlier debates, airborne transmission via small droplets and particles, has been recently acknowledged as an important route of virus spread in the COVID-19 pandemic. Revolving this matter, recent studies, scholarly discussions and regulatory guidelines have mostly emphasized on the macro aspects (e.g.,., social distancing, restrictions on using air circulation in public spaces), while there are few studies or discussions on the human microenvironment which constitutes the critical last step for airborne transmission to effectuate. Generated by body-to-air temperature gradients, human thermal plume creates persistent uprising airflows along the human boundary layer, typically as a laminar-to-turbulent flow with varying thicknesses from 2–4 mm to 200 mm and a maximum velocity of 0.2–0.3 m/s, which is comparable to the designed air velocity in various buildings with mixed ventilation under the current design criteria. Being a constant source of directional airflows and thermal buoyancy, in a clam indoor environment thermal plume plays a significant or even dominant role in the aerosol transport dynamics in the human boundary layer where most inhaled air comes from. Existing evidence shows that thermal plume has significant influences on the diffusion and transport of volatile compounds, exfoliated human skin scales and airborne microplastics into the human breathing zone in typical indoor environments. Meanwhile, thermal plume promotes the dispersion of human respiratory droplets from the source by ascending them along the boundary layer and into the upper atmosphere. Based on the mechanisms and key variables in the formation of thermal plume (e.g., ambient temperature, body posture and type of clothing), several precautionary measures may be put in the place to reduce the risks associated with thermal plume and its induced aerosol transport in the human microenvironment. Where possible, eliminating the sources of indoor particle emissions (e.g., smoking, cooking, laser printing), maintaining natural ventilation, moving body closer to desk and wearing long and loose clothing can reduce the magnitude or influences of thermal plume and the resultant risks of inhaling virus-laden droplets and particles rising from lower regions in indoor spaces. Given that people spent most of their time in various indoor environments and there is an increasing trend of adopting sedentary lifestyles in the global population, it is of significance to further study the roles of thermal plume and the human microenvironments in the airborne transmission of COVID-19 and other human respiratory pathogens, especially in enclosed public spaces.