Literature DB >> 33495002

Examining the role and relevance of the critical analysis and comparison of cesarean section rates in a changing world.

Simran A Ganeriwal1, Gillian A Ryan2, Nikhil C Purandare3, Chittaranjan N Purandare4.   

Abstract

Cesarean section (CS) is one of the most commonly performed surgical operations in the world and has resulted in improved maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality rates internationally. However, concerns have been raised regarding the ever increasing CS rates to what has been described as 'epidemic' proportions. Global CS rates have increased from 6.7% in 1990 to 19.1% in 2014. However, there is a vast variation in the CS rates between countries with CS rates of 44.3% reported across Latin America & the Caribbean and CS rates as low as 4.1% in central and West Africa. There is much controversy regarding the optimal figure for CS in a population. The optimal CS rates for a population have been recommend in various studies, ranging from 10% to 19%, above which no reported improvement in maternal and neonatal mortality rates is observed. This review examines the evolution of the changing indications for CS and increasing CS rates in a world where family sizes are reducing and maternal age at first pregnancy is increasing. Efforts must be made to agree on an appropriate classification system whereby CS rates can be compared accurately between units and countries as a useful tool to audit and monitor our practice. Obstetricians should consider the indications for each CS performed, be conscious of the CS rate in our own countries and institutions and most importantly, be cognizant of how the CS rate impacts the maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality rates and adjust our practice accordingly, to minimize harm.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparing cesarean section rates; Indications for cesarean section; Optimal rate of cesarean section; Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality

Year:  2021        PMID: 33495002     DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1028-4559            Impact factor:   1.705


  2 in total

1.  Multi-Indicator Intelligent Monitoring of Clinical Observations to Reduce Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Shasha Xie; Wei Dong; Yeting Liu; Haixiao Gao; Dan Zhang
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Prediction of Scar Myometrium Thickness and Previous Cesarean Scar Defect Using the Three-Dimensional Vaginal Ultrasound.

Authors:  Liang Shi; Keke Du
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.009

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.