Crystal B Chen1, Raj K Dalsania1, Eman A Hamad2. 1. Department of Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. Department of Cardiology, Temple Heart and Vascular Institute, Section of Advanced Heart Failure and Transplantation, Temple University Hospital, 3401 N Broad Street, Parkinson Pavilion, 9th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA. eman.hamad@tuhs.temple.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiotoxicity remains a dreaded complication for patients undergoing chemotherapy with human epidermal growth factor (HER)-2 receptor antagonists and anthracyclines. Though many studies have looked at racial disparities in heart failure patients, minimal data is present for the cardio-oncology population. METHODS: We queried the echocardiogram database at a safety net hospital, defined by a high proportion of patients with Medicaid or no insurance, for patients who received HER2 receptor antagonists and/or anthracyclines from January 2016 to December 2018. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes were collected. Based on US census data in 2019, home ZIP codes were used to group patients into quartiles based on median annual household income. The primary end point studied was referral rate to cardiology for patients undergoing chemotherapy. RESULTS: We identified 149 patients who had echocardiograms and also underwent treatment with HER2 receptor antagonists and/or anthracyclines, of which 70 (47.0%) were referred to the cardio-oncology program at our institution. Basic demographics were similar, but white patients were more likely to live in ZIP codes with higher income quartiles (p < 0.00001). Comparing between racial groups, there was no statistical difference in the percentage of patients that had a reduction in ejection fraction (EF) (p = 0.75). There was no statistical difference between racial groups in the number of cardiology or oncology appointments attended, number of appointments cancelled, average number of echocardiograms received, additional cardiac imaging received. Black patients were more likely to receive ACEI/ARB post chemotherapy (p = 0.047). A logistic regression model was created using race, age, gender, insurance, income quartile by home ZIP code, comorbidities (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, arrhythmia, diabetes mellitus, smoking, family history, age > 65), procedures (coronary stents, cardiac surgery), medications pre-chemotherapy, cancer type, cancer stage, and chemotherapy. This model found that there was an increased referral rate among patients from higher income quartiles (p = 0.017 for quartile 3, p = 0.049 for quartile 4), patients with a history of hypertension (p < 0.0001), and patients with breast cancer (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that patients of our cardio-oncology population at a safety net hospital receive the same level of surveillance and treatment, and develop drop in ejection fraction at similar rates regardless of their race. However, patients that reside in ZIP codes associated with higher income quartiles, with hypertension, and with breast cancer, are associated with increased rate of referral.
BACKGROUND:Cardiotoxicity remains a dreaded complication for patients undergoing chemotherapy with humanepidermal growth factor (HER)-2 receptor antagonists and anthracyclines. Though many studies have looked at racial disparities in heart failurepatients, minimal data is present for the cardio-oncology population. METHODS: We queried the echocardiogram database at a safety net hospital, defined by a high proportion of patients with Medicaid or no insurance, for patients who received HER2 receptor antagonists and/or anthracyclines from January 2016 to December 2018. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes were collected. Based on US census data in 2019, home ZIP codes were used to group patients into quartiles based on median annual household income. The primary end point studied was referral rate to cardiology for patients undergoing chemotherapy. RESULTS: We identified 149 patients who had echocardiograms and also underwent treatment with HER2 receptor antagonists and/or anthracyclines, of which 70 (47.0%) were referred to the cardio-oncology program at our institution. Basic demographics were similar, but white patients were more likely to live in ZIP codes with higher income quartiles (p < 0.00001). Comparing between racial groups, there was no statistical difference in the percentage of patients that had a reduction in ejection fraction (EF) (p = 0.75). There was no statistical difference between racial groups in the number of cardiology or oncology appointments attended, number of appointments cancelled, average number of echocardiograms received, additional cardiac imaging received. Black patients were more likely to receive ACEI/ARB post chemotherapy (p = 0.047). A logistic regression model was created using race, age, gender, insurance, income quartile by home ZIP code, comorbidities (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, arrhythmia, diabetes mellitus, smoking, family history, age > 65), procedures (coronary stents, cardiac surgery), medications pre-chemotherapy, cancer type, cancer stage, and chemotherapy. This model found that there was an increased referral rate among patients from higher income quartiles (p = 0.017 for quartile 3, p = 0.049 for quartile 4), patients with a history of hypertension (p < 0.0001), and patients with breast cancer (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that patients of our cardio-oncology population at a safety net hospital receive the same level of surveillance and treatment, and develop drop in ejection fraction at similar rates regardless of their race. However, patients that reside in ZIP codes associated with higher income quartiles, with hypertension, and with breast cancer, are associated with increased rate of referral.
Authors: Katie J Wiskar; Leo Anthony Celi; Robert C McDermid; Keith R Walley; James A Russell; John H Boyd; Barret Rush Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Saro H Armenian; Christina Lacchetti; Ana Barac; Joseph Carver; Louis S Constine; Neelima Denduluri; Susan Dent; Pamela S Douglas; Jean-Bernard Durand; Michael Ewer; Carol Fabian; Melissa Hudson; Mariell Jessup; Lee W Jones; Bonnie Ky; Erica L Mayer; Javid Moslehi; Kevin Oeffinger; Katharine Ray; Kathryn Ruddy; Daniel Lenihan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mercedes R Carnethon; Jia Pu; George Howard; Michelle A Albert; Cheryl A M Anderson; Alain G Bertoni; Mahasin S Mujahid; Latha Palaniappan; Herman A Taylor; Monte Willis; Clyde W Yancy Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Anya Litvak; Bhavina Batukbhai; Stuart D Russell; Hua-Ling Tsai; Gary L Rosner; Stacie C Jeter; Deborah Armstrong; Leisha A Emens; John Fetting; Antonio C Wolff; Raquel Silhy; Vered Stearns; Roisin M Connolly Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-01-30 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: David Naumann; Victoria Rusius; Chiara Margiotta; Alan Nevill; Amtul Carmichael; Daniel Rea; Martin Sintler Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Amrita Mukherjee; Howard W Wiener; Russell L Griffin; Carrie Lenneman; Arka Chatterjee; Lisle M Nabell; Cora E Lewis; Sadeep Shrestha Journal: Head Neck Date: 2022-04-09 Impact factor: 3.821