Gereon Schares1, Majda Globokar Vrhovec2, Mareen Tuschy3, Maike Joeres3, Andrea Bärwald3, Bretislav Koudela4,5, Jitender P Dubey6, Pavlo Maksimov3, Franz J Conraths3. 1. National Reference Laboratory for Toxoplasmosis, Institute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany. gereon.schares@fli.de. 2. IDEXX Laboratories, Humboldtstraße. 2, Kornwestheim, 70806, Germany. 3. National Reference Laboratory for Toxoplasmosis, Institute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany. 4. Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Palackého tř. 1946/1, Brno, 612 42, Czech Republic. 5. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Palackého tř. 1946/1, Brno, 612 42, Czech Republic. 6. Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agriculture Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Building 1001, Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Hammondia hammondi and Toxoplasma gondii are closely related protozoan parasites, but only T. gondii is zoonotic. Both species use felids as definitive hosts and cannot be differentiated by oocyst morphology. In T. gondii, a 529-base pair (bp) repetitive element (TgREP-529) is of utmost diagnostic importance for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) diagnostic tests. We identified a similar repetitive region in the H. hammondi genome (HhamREP-529). METHODS: Based on reported sequences, primers and probes were selected in silico and optimal primer probe combinations were explored, also by including previously published primers. The analytical sensitivity was tested using serial dilutions of oocyst DNA. For testing analytical specificity, DNA isolated from several related species was used as controls. The newly established TaqMan PCR (Hham-qPCR1) was applied to tissues collected from H. hammondi-infected gamma-interferon gene knockout (GKO) mice at varying time points post-infection. RESULTS: Ten forward and six reverse primers were tested in varying combinations. Four potentially suitable dual-labelled probes were selected. One set based on the primer pair (Hham275F, Hham81R) and the probe (Hham222P) yielded optimal results. In addition to excellent analytic specificity, the assay revealed an analytical sensitivity of genome equivalents of less than one oocyst. Investigation of the tissue distribution in GKO mice revealed the presence of parasite DNA in all examined organs, but to a varying extent, suggesting 100- to 10,000-fold differences in parasitic loads between tissues in the chronic state of infection, 42 days post-infection. DISCUSSION: The use of the 529-bp repeat of H. hammondi is suitable for establishing a quantitative real-time PCR assay, because this repeat probably exists about 200 times in the genome of a single organism, like its counterpart in T. gondii. Although there were enough sequence data available, only a few of the primers predicted in silico revealed sufficient amplification; the identification of a suitable probe was also difficult. This is in accord with our previous observations on considerable variability in the 529-bp repetitive element of H. hammondi. CONCLUSIONS: The H. hammondi real-time PCR represents an important novel diagnostic tool for epidemiological and cell biological studies on H. hammondi and related parasites.
INTRODUCTION:Hammondia hammondi and Toxoplasma gondii are closely related protozoan parasites, but only T. gondii is zoonotic. Both species use felids as definitive hosts and cannot be differentiated by oocyst morphology. In T. gondii, a 529-base pair (bp) repetitive element (TgREP-529) is of utmost diagnostic importance for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) diagnostic tests. We identified a similar repetitive region in the H. hammondi genome (HhamREP-529). METHODS: Based on reported sequences, primers and probes were selected in silico and optimal primer probe combinations were explored, also by including previously published primers. The analytical sensitivity was tested using serial dilutions of oocyst DNA. For testing analytical specificity, DNA isolated from several related species was used as controls. The newly established TaqMan PCR (Hham-qPCR1) was applied to tissues collected from H. hammondi-infected gamma-interferon gene knockout (GKO) mice at varying time points post-infection. RESULTS: Ten forward and six reverse primers were tested in varying combinations. Four potentially suitable dual-labelled probes were selected. One set based on the primer pair (Hham275F, Hham81R) and the probe (Hham222P) yielded optimal results. In addition to excellent analytic specificity, the assay revealed an analytical sensitivity of genome equivalents of less than one oocyst. Investigation of the tissue distribution in GKO mice revealed the presence of parasite DNA in all examined organs, but to a varying extent, suggesting 100- to 10,000-fold differences in parasitic loads between tissues in the chronic state of infection, 42 days post-infection. DISCUSSION: The use of the 529-bp repeat of H. hammondi is suitable for establishing a quantitative real-time PCR assay, because this repeat probably exists about 200 times in the genome of a single organism, like its counterpart in T. gondii. Although there were enough sequence data available, only a few of the primers predicted in silico revealed sufficient amplification; the identification of a suitable probe was also difficult. This is in accord with our previous observations on considerable variability in the 529-bp repetitive element of H. hammondi. CONCLUSIONS: The H. hammondi real-time PCR represents an important novel diagnostic tool for epidemiological and cell biological studies on H. hammondi and related parasites.
Authors: Katelyn A Walzer; Yaw Adomako-Ankomah; Rachel A Dam; Daland C Herrmann; Gereon Schares; Jitender P Dubey; Jon P Boyle Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Katelyn A Walzer; Gregory M Wier; Rachel A Dam; Ananth R Srinivasan; Adair L Borges; Elizabeth D English; Daland C Herrmann; Gereon Schares; Jitender P Dubey; Jon P Boyle Journal: Eukaryot Cell Date: 2014-10-03
Authors: G Schares; D C Herrmann; A Beckert; S Schares; M Hosseininejad; N Pantchev; M Globokar Vrhovec; F J Conraths Journal: Mol Cell Probes Date: 2008-05-08 Impact factor: 2.365
Authors: J P Dubey; G Tilahun; J P Boyle; G Schares; S K Verma; L R Ferreira; S Oliveira; N Tiao; C Darrington; W A Gebreyes Journal: J Parasitol Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 1.276
Authors: Nadia María López Ureña; Umer Chaudhry; Rafael Calero Bernal; Santiago Cano Alsua; Davide Messina; Francisco Evangelista; Martha Betson; Marco Lalle; Pikka Jokelainen; Luis Miguel Ortega Mora; Gema Álvarez García Journal: Microorganisms Date: 2022-02-27