Literature DB >> 33494097

Zooplankton variability in the Strait of Georgia, Canada, and relationships with the marine survivals of Chinook and Coho salmon.

R Ian Perry1,2, Kelly Young2, Moira Galbraith2, Peter Chandler2, Antonio Velez-Espino1, Steve Baillie1.   

Abstract

The Strait of Georgia, Canada, has complex interactions among natural and human pressures that confound understanding of changes in this system. We report on the interannual variability in biomass of 12 zooplankton taxonomic groups in the deep (bottom depths greater than 50 m) central and northern Strait of Georgia from 1996 to 2018, and their relationships with 10 physical variables. Total zooplankton biomass was dominated (76%) by large-sized crustaceans (euphausiids, large and medium size calanoid copepods, amphipods). The annual anomaly of total zooplankton biomass was highest in the late 1990s, lowest in the mid-2000s, and generally above its climatological (1996-2010) average after 2011, although many individual groups had different patterns. Two latent trends (derived from dynamic factor analyses) described the variability of annual biomass anomalies underlying all zooplankton groups: a U-shaped trend with its minimum in the mid-2000s, and a declining trend from 2001 to 2011. Two latent trends also described the physical variables. The variability represented by these four latent trends clustered into two periods: 1996-2006, with generally declining zooplankton biomass and increasing salinities, and 2007-2018, with increasing zooplankton biomass and decreasing salinities. ARIMA modelling showed sea surface salinity at Entrance Island in the middle Strait of Georgia, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, and the peak date of the spring phytoplankton bloom were significantly related to the two latent zooplankton trends. ARIMA models comparing zooplankton and physical variables with the marine survivals of four salmon populations which enter the Strait as juveniles (Chinook: Cowichan River, Puntledge River, Harrison River; Coho: Big Qualicum River) all included zooplankton groups consistent with known salmon prey; prominent among the physical variables were sea surface salinity and variables representing the flow from the Fraser River. These regressions explained (adjR2) 38 to 85% of the annual variability in marine survival rates of these salmon populations over the study time period. Although sea temperature was important in some relationships between zooplankton biomass and salmon marine survival, salinity was a more frequent and more important variable, consistent with its influence on the hydrodynamics of the Strait of Georgia system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33494097      PMCID: PMC7834739          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  5 in total

1.  Temperature control of larval dispersal and the implications for marine ecology, evolution, and conservation.

Authors:  Mary I O'Connor; John F Bruno; Steven D Gaines; Benjamin S Halpern; Sarah E Lester; Brian P Kinlan; Jack M Weiss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology.

Authors:  David I Warton; Francis K C Hui
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Non-stationary climate-salmon relationships in the Gulf of Alaska.

Authors:  Michael A Litzow; Lorenzo Ciannelli; Patricia Puerta; Justin J Wettstein; Ryan R Rykaczewski; Michael Opiekun
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Linking killer whale survival and prey abundance: food limitation in the oceans' apex predator?

Authors:  John K B Ford; Graeme M Ellis; Peter F Olesiuk; Kenneth C Balcomb
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Seasonal and spatial dynamics of the planktonic trophic biomarkers in the Strait of Georgia (northeast Pacific) and implications for fish.

Authors:  David Costalago; Ian Forster; Nina Nemcek; Chrys Neville; R Ian Perry; Kelly Young; Brian P V Hunt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.