Literature DB >> 33493638

Effect of patient and parental anxiety on adherence to subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Ilknur Kulhas Celik1, Azize Pinar Metbulut2, Ozden Sukran Uneri3, Gulser Senses Dinc3, Emine Dibek Misirlioglu4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33493638      PMCID: PMC7825879          DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


× No keyword cloud information.
The global spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has resulted in more than a million deaths to date despite many strategies implemented to limit transmission, such as social distancing, wearing a face mask, quarantining and isolation. , These strategies were also applied in health care facilities, including recommendations for minimizing face-to-face meetings in allergy and immunology clinics and taking necessary precautions to minimize the risk of transmission. Discontinuing subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is not recommended in patients who do not have coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) or were previously infected. It is also recommended that the interval between doses can be extended to 2 weeks in the build-up phase and up to 6 weeks in the maintenance phase.3, 4, 5 A recent study found that the anxiety levels of the parents of children hospitalized during the COVID-19 pandemic were higher than those of parents whose children were hospitalized before the pandemic. Patients receiving SCIT and their parents must continue to come to the hospital for SCIT during the pandemic. We aimed to evaluate the effect of patient and parental anxiety on adherence to SCIT during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients who underwent venom and aeroallergen SCIT in our pediatric allergy and immunology hospital clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic between May 1, 2020, and September 1, 2020, and their parents were included in our study. The patients' age, sex, SCIT type, phase and duration, and adherence to SCIT since the start of the pandemic were recorded. The study was approved by the ethics review committee of Ankara City Hospital and by the Turkish Ministry of Health. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients' parents. Per the recommendations, the interval between doses was extended to 2 weeks in the build-up phase and 6 weeks in the maintenance phase; the patients were informed. The patients were classified as adherent (patients who continued SCIT according to schedule during the pandemic), nonadherent (patients who continued SCIT during the pandemic but with between-dose intervals longer than 2 weeks in the build-up phase and 6 weeks in the maintenance phase), or discontinued treatment (patients who did not present for SCIT at all since the pandemic started). The anxiety levels of our patients were assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for children, which is a tool to evaluate the state and trait anxiety in children aged 8 to 18 years.7, 8 Patients older than 18 years and the parents were assessed using the STAI. Similar to the STAI for children, the STAI consists of the state anxiety scale and the trait anxiety scale with higher scores reflecting higher anxiety levels. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 22.0 for Windows (International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, New York). The χ2 square test was used to compare nonparametric data; the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparisons among non–normally distributed continuous variables and independent samples t test for normally distributed continuous variables. A value of P < .05 was considered statistically significant. The study included 78 patients (62.8% male) who started SCIT (8 patients for venom, 70 patients for aeroallergen) in our hospital clinic and attended treatment regularly before the pandemic. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 14.87 (±3.48) (minimum-maximum [min-max]: 8-23.5) years. After the start of the pandemic, 39 (50%) patients continued SCIT regularly (adherent group), 23 patients continued treatment with extended dose intervals (nonadherent group), and 16 patients discontinued treatment. Of the 16 patients (68.8% male) who discontinued treatment, 10 patients were in the build-up phase and 6 were in the maintenance phase. When asked the reason for SCIT discontinuation, 16 patients cited fear of COVID-19 transmission. Significantly more patients who discontinued treatment were in the build-up phase compared with patients who continued SCIT (P = .006) (Table 1 ).
Table 1

Demographic Characteristics and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Scores of Patients Receiving Subcutaneous Immunotherapy and Their Parents

CharacteristicContinued SCIT, adherent (n = 39)Continued SCIT, nonadherent (n = 23)Discontinued SCIT (n = 16)P valuea (adherent vs nonadherent)P valueb (continued vs discontinued)
Patient sex, n (%)
 Female24 (61.5)14 (60.8)11 (68.7).85.58
 Male15 (38.5)9 (39.2)5 (31.3)
Patient age (y)
 Mean ± SD14.4 ± 3.615.5 ± 3.3814.9 ± 3.32.25.90
Parental age (y)
 Mean ± SD42.5 ± 5.843.35 ± 6.65NA.63
Phase of SCIT, n (%)
 Build-up phase16 (41)0 (0)10 (62.5)<.001.006
 Maintenance phase23(59)23 (100)6 (37.5)
Patient state anxiety score
 Mean ± SD33.24 ± 7.0835.5 ± 8.38NA.33
Patient trait anxiety score
 Mean ± SD34.39 ± 7.3839.5 ± 8.5NA.02
Parental state anxiety score
 Mean ± SD36.89 ± 9.8639.11 ± 8.10NA.40
Parental trait anxiety score
 Mean ± SD40.37 ± 7.8742.84 ± 7.47NA.26

Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; SCIT, subcutaneous immunotherapy.

P values in the 5th column refer to the comparisons between adherent and nonadherent patients using the chi square and student t-test.

P values in the last column refer to the comparisons between continued and discontinued patients using the chi square and student t-test.

Demographic Characteristics and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Scores of Patients Receiving Subcutaneous Immunotherapy and Their Parents Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; SCIT, subcutaneous immunotherapy. P values in the 5th column refer to the comparisons between adherent and nonadherent patients using the chi square and student t-test. P values in the last column refer to the comparisons between continued and discontinued patients using the chi square and student t-test. A total of 23 patients exceeded the recommended between-dose intervals. When asked regarding the reason for SCIT nonadherence, 22 patients cited fear of COVID-19 transmission and 1 patient had to extend the dosing interval owing to quarantine (because his father had a confirmed COVID-19 infection). Among the patients who continued treatment, the mean state anxiety score was 35.6 (±8.3) (min-max: 20-54) and the mean trait anxiety score was 33.7 (±7.5) (min-max: 23-52). Among the parents, the mean state and trait anxiety scores were 36.6 (±9) (min-max: 21-54) and 40.9 (±7.6) (min-max: 25–58), respectively. A comparison of patients who continued to adhere to the SCIT dose schedule during the pandemic and those who continued treatment but with nonadherence revealed no statistically significant difference in patient state anxiety score or parental state and trait anxiety scores (P =.33; .04; .26 respectively), whereas trait anxiety score was higher among nonadherent patients compared with adherent patients (P = .02) (Table 1). It is recommended to continue treatment with extended dose intervals for patients already receiving SCIT. All of our patients started SCIT before the pandemic. Patients in the build-up phase accounted for a significant proportion of patients who discontinued treatment. Patients in the build-up phase had only been receiving treatment for a few months and had to come every 2 weeks until this phase was complete. In contrast, patients in the maintenance phase had been visiting our hospital clinic for treatment for years and needed to come every 6 weeks during the pandemic. The higher rate of treatment cessation during the build-up phase may be attributed to the fact that these patients had invested less time in treatment before the pandemic and were being required to visit a hospital clinic more frequently. Yuan et al reported that anxiety was more pronounced in the parents of children hospitalized during the pandemic. Our patients were present in the hospital for approximately 1 hour to receive SCIT. Our evaluation revealed that there was no difference in patient or parental state anxiety and parental trait anxiety between the adherent and nonadherent groups, whereas trait anxiety was higher among nonadherent patients. The patients in our sample were predominantly adolescents. Our findings are consistent with the data from studies indicating that in this age group, the patients themselves have a greater effect on treatment processes. In conclusion, half of our patients were fully adherent to SCIT during the pandemic. The trait anxiety level of the patients was the only patient or parental anxiety factor associated with poorer SCIT adherence. Therefore, we believe that treatment adherence may be improved if allergists refer the patients who were observed to be particularly anxious for child psychiatric evaluation.
  5 in total

1.  Real-life data on inactivated COVID-19 vaccination in patients with subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yingyang Xu; Kai Guan
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.871

2.  The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Adolescents with Asthma.

Authors:  Sukru Cekic; Zuhal Karali; Fatih Cicek; Yakup Canitez; Nihat Sapan
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Allergen Immunotherapy management during vaccinations: An international survey.

Authors:  Simonetta Masieri; Claus Bachert; Pedro Ojeda; Chang-Keun Kim; Carlo Cavaliere; Giorgio Ciprandi
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.084

4.  Allergen-specific immunotherapy practices and course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients during COVID-19.

Authors:  Merve Erkoç; Betül Özdel Öztürk; Dilşad Mungan; Derya Öztuna; Sevim Bavbek; Yavuz Selim Demirel; Ömür Aydın; Betül Ayşe Sin
Journal:  Asia Pac Allergy       Date:  2022-01-24

5.  Real-life adherence to subcutaneous immunotherapy: What has changed in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ilkay Koca Kalkan; Hale Ates; Kurtulus Aksu; Selma Yesilkaya; Musa Topel; Dilek Cuhadar Ercelebi; Suleyman Turkyilmaz; Ali Oncul; Senay Demir
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.084

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.