| Literature DB >> 33493319 |
Ginu Unnikrishnan1, Haojie Mao1, Venkata Siva Sai Sujith Sajja2, Stephen van Albert2, Aravind Sundaramurthy1, Jose E Rubio1, Dhananjay Radhakrishnan Subramaniam1, Joseph Long2, Jaques Reifman3.
Abstract
In this study, we investigated how animal orientation within a shock tube influences the biomechanical responses of the brain and cerebral vasculature of a rat when exposed to a blast wave. Using three-dimensional finite element (FE) models, we computed the biomechanical responses when the rat was exposed to the same blast-wave overpressure (100 kPa) in a prone (P), vertical (V), or head-only (HO) orientation. We validated our model by comparing the model-predicted and the experimentally measured brain pressures at the lateral ventricle. For all three orientations, the maximum difference between the predicted and measured pressures was 11%. Animal orientation markedly influenced the predicted peak pressure at the anterior position along the midsagittal plane of the brain (P = 187 kPa; V = 119 kPa; and HO = 142 kPa). However, the relative differences in the predicted peak pressure between the orientations decreased at the medial (21%) and posterior (7%) positions. In contrast to the pressure, the peak strain in the prone orientation relative to the other orientations at the anterior, medial, and posterior positions was 40-88% lower. Similarly, at these positions, the cerebral vasculature strain in the prone orientation was lower than the strain in the other orientations. These results show that animal orientation in a shock tube influences the biomechanical responses of the brain and the cerebral vasculature of the rat, strongly suggesting that a direct comparison of changes in brain tissue observed from animals exposed at different orientations can lead to incorrect conclusions.Entities:
Keywords: Sprague-Dawley rat; advanced blast simulator; brain pressure; finite element model; maximum principal strain; shock tube; traumatic brain injury
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33493319 DOI: 10.1115/1.4049889
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomech Eng ISSN: 0148-0731 Impact factor: 2.097