Literature DB >> 33493319

Animal Orientation Affects Brain Biomechanical Responses to Blast-Wave Exposure.

Ginu Unnikrishnan1, Haojie Mao1, Venkata Siva Sai Sujith Sajja2, Stephen van Albert2, Aravind Sundaramurthy1, Jose E Rubio1, Dhananjay Radhakrishnan Subramaniam1, Joseph Long2, Jaques Reifman3.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigated how animal orientation within a shock tube influences the biomechanical responses of the brain and cerebral vasculature of a rat when exposed to a blast wave. Using three-dimensional finite element (FE) models, we computed the biomechanical responses when the rat was exposed to the same blast-wave overpressure (100 kPa) in a prone (P), vertical (V), or head-only (HO) orientation. We validated our model by comparing the model-predicted and the experimentally measured brain pressures at the lateral ventricle. For all three orientations, the maximum difference between the predicted and measured pressures was 11%. Animal orientation markedly influenced the predicted peak pressure at the anterior position along the midsagittal plane of the brain (P = 187 kPa; V = 119 kPa; and HO = 142 kPa). However, the relative differences in the predicted peak pressure between the orientations decreased at the medial (21%) and posterior (7%) positions. In contrast to the pressure, the peak strain in the prone orientation relative to the other orientations at the anterior, medial, and posterior positions was 40-88% lower. Similarly, at these positions, the cerebral vasculature strain in the prone orientation was lower than the strain in the other orientations. These results show that animal orientation in a shock tube influences the biomechanical responses of the brain and the cerebral vasculature of the rat, strongly suggesting that a direct comparison of changes in brain tissue observed from animals exposed at different orientations can lead to incorrect conclusions.
Copyright © 2021 by ASME.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sprague-Dawley rat; advanced blast simulator; brain pressure; finite element model; maximum principal strain; shock tube; traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33493319     DOI: 10.1115/1.4049889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  4 in total

1.  Limbic Responses Following Shock Wave Exposure in Male and Female Mice.

Authors:  Eileen H McNamara; Laura B Tucker; Jiong Liu; Amanda H Fu; Yeonho Kim; Patricia A Vu; Joseph T McCabe
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  A 3-D Finite-Element Minipig Model to Assess Brain Biomechanical Responses to Blast Exposure.

Authors:  Aravind Sundaramurthy; Vivek Bhaskar Kote; Noah Pearson; Gregory M Boiczyk; Elizabeth M McNeil; Allison J Nelson; Dhananjay Radhakrishnan Subramaniam; Jose E Rubio; Kenneth Monson; Warren N Hardy; Pamela J VandeVord; Ginu Unnikrishnan; Jaques Reifman
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-17

3.  A biomechanical-based approach to scale blast-induced molecular changes in the brain.

Authors:  Jose E Rubio; Dhananjay Radhakrishnan Subramaniam; Ginu Unnikrishnan; Venkata Siva Sai Sujith Sajja; Stephen Van Albert; Franco Rossetti; Andrew Frock; Giang Nguyen; Aravind Sundaramurthy; Joseph B Long; Jaques Reifman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Investigation of the direct and indirect mechanisms of primary blast insult to the brain.

Authors:  Jose E Rubio; Ginu Unnikrishnan; Venkata Siva Sai Sujith Sajja; Stephen Van Albert; Franco Rossetti; Maciej Skotak; Eren Alay; Aravind Sundaramurthy; Dhananjay Radhakrishnan Subramaniam; Joseph B Long; Namas Chandra; Jaques Reifman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.