Jennifer Cullen1, Julie A Lynch2, Eric A Klein3, Stephen K Van Den Eeden4, Peter R Carroll5, James L Mohler6, Dejan Knezevic7, Thomas A Farrington8, Ruixiao Lu7. 1. Cancer Population Sciences, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. 2. Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah. 3. Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, Ohio. 4. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California. 5. University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 6. Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York. 7. Genomic Health Inc., an Exact Sciences corporation, Redwood City, California. 8. Prostate Health Education Network, Inc., Quincy, Massachusetts.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Adoption of prognostic molecular assays for prostate cancer requires evidence of robust performance in different racial groups. Retrospective analysis was conducted to assess the performance of the Oncotype DX® Genomic Prostate Score® test in African American and Caucasian American men with surgically treated prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the assay results (scale 0-100) and the 4 gene group scores in biopsy specimens from 201 African American and 1,144 Caucasian American men with clinically localized prostate cancer in 6 cohorts. Adverse pathology was defined as high grade (primary Gleason pattern 4 or any pattern 5) and/or nonorgan-confined disease (≥pT3). Binary logistic regression models were used for adverse pathology. Biochemical recurrence was defined as 2 successive prostate specific antigen levels >0.2 ng/ml or initiation of salvage therapy after radical prostatectomy. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the association of the assay result or racial group with time to biochemical recurrence. RESULTS: Each cohort had different clinical risk distributions and percentages of African Americans, although median and interquartile ranges of the assay results and gene group scores were similar between both racial groups. In a multivariable model with the assay and pathological/clinical features including race, the assay was significantly associated with adverse pathology (p ≤0.004) and biochemical recurrence (p <0.001). Race was not a significant predictor of either end point. CONCLUSIONS: The assay is similarly predictive of outcomes in African American and Caucasian American patients, and improves risk stratification in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer from both racial groups.
PURPOSE: Adoption of prognostic molecular assays for prostate cancer requires evidence of robust performance in different racial groups. Retrospective analysis was conducted to assess the performance of the Oncotype DX® Genomic Prostate Score® test in African American and Caucasian American men with surgically treated prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the assay results (scale 0-100) and the 4 gene group scores in biopsy specimens from 201 African American and 1,144 Caucasian American men with clinically localized prostate cancer in 6 cohorts. Adverse pathology was defined as high grade (primary Gleason pattern 4 or any pattern 5) and/or nonorgan-confined disease (≥pT3). Binary logistic regression models were used for adverse pathology. Biochemical recurrence was defined as 2 successive prostate specific antigen levels >0.2 ng/ml or initiation of salvage therapy after radical prostatectomy. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the association of the assay result or racial group with time to biochemical recurrence. RESULTS: Each cohort had different clinical risk distributions and percentages of African Americans, although median and interquartile ranges of the assay results and gene group scores were similar between both racial groups. In a multivariable model with the assay and pathological/clinical features including race, the assay was significantly associated with adverse pathology (p ≤0.004) and biochemical recurrence (p <0.001). Race was not a significant predictor of either end point. CONCLUSIONS: The assay is similarly predictive of outcomes in African American and Caucasian American patients, and improves risk stratification in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer from both racial groups.
Authors: Philip Sutera; Matthew P Deek; Kim Van der Eecken; Alexander W Wyatt; Amar U Kishan; Jason K Molitoris; Matthew J Ferris; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Zaker Rana; Mark V Mishra; Young Kwok; Elai Davicioni; Daniel E Spratt; Piet Ost; Felix Y Feng; Phuoc T Tran Journal: Prostate Date: 2022-08 Impact factor: 4.012
Authors: Daniel J George; Lorelei A Mucci; Ilkania M Chowdhury-Paulino; Caroline Ericsson; Randy Vince; Daniel E Spratt Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2021-09-02 Impact factor: 5.455
Authors: Brian T Helfand; Michael Paterakos; Chi-Hsiung Wang; Pooja Talaty; John Abran; John Bennett; David W Hall; Amy Lehman; Tamer Aboushwareb Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 3.752