Literature DB >> 3349291

Prospective study of conservative and operative treatment for faecal incontinence.

R Miller1, D C Bartolo, J C Locke-Edmunds, N J Mortensen.   

Abstract

To assess the functional results of treatment of faecal incontinence we carried out physiological and radiological measurements in 46 patients and 20 controls. Twenty patients were selected for conservative treatment and 26 for surgery (including 17 postanal repairs and 6 anterior sphincter repairs). The degree of incontinence was scored before and after treatment and postoperative investigations carried out on 17 patients (11 postanal repairs). Forty per cent of the conservative treatment group had a successful result compared with sixty-five per cent of the operative group as a whole and fifty-nine per cent of the postanal repair patients. Resting and 'squeeze' anal canal pressures were improved following postanal repair as was upper anal canal sensation but there was no change in the anorectal angle. We conclude that the anorectal angle is not crucial in maintaining continence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3349291     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800750204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  19 in total

Review 1.  Fecal incontinence.

Authors:  M Lamah; D Kumar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Comparative analysis of summary scoring systems in measuring fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Moo-Kyung Seong; Sung-Il Jung; Tae-Won Kim; Hee-Kyung Joh
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2011-11-01

Review 3.  Anal manometry.

Authors:  R J Felt-Bersma; S G Meuwissen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems.

Authors:  C J Vaizey; E Carapeti; J A Cahill; M A Kamm
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Rectal advancement flap for the treatment of complex cryptoglandular anal fistulas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zutoia Balciscueta; Natalia Uribe; Izaskun Balciscueta; Juan Carlos Andreu-Ballester; Eduardo García-Granero
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Differences in anal sensation in continent and incontinent patients with perineal descent.

Authors:  R Miller; D C Bartolo; F Cervero; N J Mortensen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Is there a role for concomitant pelvic floor repair in patients with sphincter defects in the treatment of fecal incontinence?

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Patrick Lee; Philip S Mullenix; Matthew J Martin; Eugene S Sullivan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Efficacy and quality of life 2 years after treatment for faecal incontinence with injectable bulking agents.

Authors:  J Danielson; U Karlbom; T Wester; W Graf
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  The clinical contribution of integrated laboratory and ambulatory anorectal physiology assessment in faecal incontinence.

Authors:  R Farouk; D C Bartolo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Endpoints for therapeutic interventions in faecal incontinence: small step or game changer.

Authors:  S S C Rao
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.