Literature DB >> 33492722

Exposure and Risk Assessment of Hg, Cd, As, Tl, Se, and Mo in Women of Reproductive Age Using Urinary Biomonitoring.

Clara Coscollà1, Alfredo Sánchez2, Francisca Corpas-Burgos1, Antonio López1, Rosa Pérez1, Julia Kuligowski3, Máximo Vento4, Vicent Yusà1,5,6.   

Abstract

The present study analyzed the exposure and risk assessment of 4 toxic (Hg, Cd, As, Tl) and 2 essential (Se, Mo) elements in 119 Spanish women of reproductive age. The focus was on the elements for which risk-based benchmark, biomonitoring equivalents, or health-related human biomonitoring values have already been established. All elements presented frequencies of detection of 100% (greater than the limit of detection), except for Cd (99%). The 95th percentile concentrations were, for the toxic metals, 358.37 µg/L (total As), 1.10 µg/L (Cd), 0.41 µg/L (Tl), and 3.03 µg/L (total Hg) and, for the essential elements, 68.95 µg/L (total Se) and 154.67 (Mo). We examined sociodemographic factors and dietary habits of women as predictors of urinary metal concentrations. Arsenic was positively associated with fish, shellfish, and canned fish consumption, whereas Mo was found to be associated with the consumption of cereals and pastry products. Maternal urine levels of As were negatively correlated with gestational age. In a risk-assessment context, hazard quotients (HQs) using the 95th percentile ranged from 0.08 (Tl) to 15.1 (urinary speciated As), with Cd presenting an HQ of 1.1 (95th percentile). None of the essential metals presented concentrations higher than their upper intake level; however, 3% of the mothers showed lower levels of Se than the estimated average requirement (EAR) biomonitoring equivalent, and 20% of the mothers were found to have lower levels of Mo than the EAR biomonitoring equivalent, suggesting a nutritionally inadequate diet. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:1477-1490.
© 2021 SETAC. © 2021 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Human biomonitoring; Metals; Mothers; Risk assessment; Urine

Year:  2021        PMID: 33492722     DOI: 10.1002/etc.4996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  4 in total

1.  Practical Opportunities to Improve the Impact of Health Risk Assessment on Environmental and Public Health Decisions.

Authors:  Tine Bizjak; Davor Kontić; Branko Kontić
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Methylmercury Risk Assessment Based on European Human Biomonitoring Data.

Authors:  Noelia Domínguez-Morueco; Susana Pedraza-Díaz; María Del Carmen González-Caballero; Marta Esteban-López; Mercedes de Alba-González; Andromachi Katsonouri; Tiina Santonen; Ana Cañas-Portilla; Argelia Castaño
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-07-28

3.  Health Risk Assessment of Exposure to 15 Essential and Toxic Elements in Spanish Women of Reproductive Age: A Case Study.

Authors:  Carmen Sáez; Alfredo Sánchez; Vicent Yusà; Pablo Dualde; Sandra F Fernández; Antonio López; Francisca Corpas-Burgos; Miguel Ángel Aguirre; Clara Coscollà
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Human Biomonitoring Data in Health Risk Assessments Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals between 2016 and 2021: Confronting Reality after a Preliminary Review.

Authors:  Tine Bizjak; Marco Capodiferro; Deepika Deepika; Öykü Dinçkol; Vazha Dzhedzheia; Lorena Lopez-Suarez; Ioannis Petridis; Agneta A Runkel; Dayna R Schultz; Branko Kontić
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.