Sarah Babette Hageman1, Geeske van Rooijen1, Isidoor O Bergfeld1, Frederike Schirmbeck1,2, Pelle de Koning1, P Rick Schuurman3, Damiaan Denys1,4,5,6. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Arkin Institute for Mental Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 6. The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, an Institute of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Ablative surgery (ABL) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) are last-resort treatment options for patients suffering from treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The aim of this study was to conduct an updated meta-analysis comparing the clinical outcomes of the ablative procedures capsulotomy and cingulotomy and deep brain stimulation. METHODS: We conducted a PubMed search to identify all clinical trials on capsulotomy, cingulotomy, and DBS. Random effects meta-analyses were performed on 38 articles with a primary focus on efficacy in reducing OCD symptoms as measured by a reduction in the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score and the responder rate (≥35% reduction in Y-BOCS score). RESULTS: With responder rates of 48% and 53% after 12-16 months and 56% and 57% at last follow-up for ABL and DBS, respectively, and large effect sizes in the reduction in Y-BOCS scores, both surgical modalities show effectiveness in treating refractory OCD. Meta-regression did not show a statistically significant difference between ABL and DBS regarding these outcomes. Regarding adverse events, a statistically significant higher rate of impulsivity is reported in studies on DBS. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows equal efficacy of ABL and DBS in the treatment of refractory OCD. For now, the choice of intervention should, therefore, rely on factors such as risk of developing impulsivity, patient preferences, and experiences of psychiatrist and neurosurgeon. Future research should provide more insight regarding differences between ABL and DBS and response prediction following direct comparisons between the surgical modalities, to enable personalized and legitimate choices between ABL and DBS.
OBJECTIVE: Ablative surgery (ABL) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) are last-resort treatment options for patients suffering from treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The aim of this study was to conduct an updated meta-analysis comparing the clinical outcomes of the ablative procedures capsulotomy and cingulotomy and deep brain stimulation. METHODS: We conducted a PubMed search to identify all clinical trials on capsulotomy, cingulotomy, and DBS. Random effects meta-analyses were performed on 38 articles with a primary focus on efficacy in reducing OCD symptoms as measured by a reduction in the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score and the responder rate (≥35% reduction in Y-BOCS score). RESULTS: With responder rates of 48% and 53% after 12-16 months and 56% and 57% at last follow-up for ABL and DBS, respectively, and large effect sizes in the reduction in Y-BOCS scores, both surgical modalities show effectiveness in treating refractory OCD. Meta-regression did not show a statistically significant difference between ABL and DBS regarding these outcomes. Regarding adverse events, a statistically significant higher rate of impulsivity is reported in studies on DBS. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows equal efficacy of ABL and DBS in the treatment of refractory OCD. For now, the choice of intervention should, therefore, rely on factors such as risk of developing impulsivity, patient preferences, and experiences of psychiatrist and neurosurgeon. Future research should provide more insight regarding differences between ABL and DBS and response prediction following direct comparisons between the surgical modalities, to enable personalized and legitimate choices between ABL and DBS.
Authors: Laura B Bragdon; Goi Khia Eng; Amanda Belanger; Katherine A Collins; Emily R Stern Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: Christopher Pittenger; Brian P Brennan; Lorrin Koran; Carol A Mathews; Gerald Nestadt; Michele Pato; Katharine A Phillips; Carolyn I Rodriguez; H Blair Simpson; Petros Skapinakis; Dan J Stein; Eric A Storch Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 11.225
Authors: Alexandra Kammen; Jonathon Cavaleri; Jordan Lam; Adam C Frank; Xenos Mason; Wooseong Choi; Marisa Penn; Kaevon Brasfield; Barbara Van Noppen; Stuart B Murray; Darrin Jason Lee Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-08-09 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Tim A M Bouwens van der Vlis; Yavuz Samanci; Linda Ackermans; Koen R J Schruers; Y Temel; Albert F G Leentjens; Alp Dincer; Selçuk Peker Journal: Brain Spine Date: 2022-04-23