Literature DB >> 33492487

Spine surgery in pregnant women: a multicenter case series and proposition of treatment algorithm.

Vicki M Butenschoen1, Hanna Hitscherich2, Sven O Eicker3, Silvia M Lobmaier4, Judith Rösler5, Martin Bretschneider6, Jan S Kirschke7, Peter Vajkoczy5, Nikolaus Kögl8, Paul Constanthin9, Claudius Thome8, Enrico Tessitore9, Bernhard Meyer2, Maria Wostrack2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Spinal diseases requiring urgent surgical treatment are rare during pregnancy. Evidence is sparse and data are only available in the form of case reports. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive guide for spinal surgery on pregnant patients and highlight diagnostic and therapeutic aspects.
METHODS: The study included a cohort of consecutive pregnant patients who underwent spinal surgery at five high-volume neurosurgical centers between 2010 and 2017. Perioperative and perinatal clinical data were derived from medical records.
RESULTS: Twenty-four pregnant patients were included. Three underwent a preoperative cesarean section. Twenty-one patients underwent surgery during pregnancy. Median maternal age was 33 years, and median gestational age was 13 completed weeks. Indications were: lumbar disk prolapse (n = 14; including cauda equina, severe motor deficits or acute pain), unstable spine injuries (n = 4); intramedullary tumor with paraparesis (n = 1), infection (n = 1) and Schwann cell nerve root tumor presenting with high-grade paresis (n = 1). Two patients suffered transient gestational diabetes and 1 patient presented with vaginal bleeding without any signs of fetal complications. No miscarriages, stillbirths, or severe obstetric complications occurred until delivery. All patients improved neurologically after the surgery.
CONCLUSION: Spinal surgical procedures during pregnancy seem to be safe. The indication for surgery has to be very strict and surgical procedures during pregnancy should be reserved for emergency cases. For pregnant patients, the surgical strategy should be individually tailored to the mother and the fetus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pregnancy; Spine surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33492487     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06726-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

Review 1.  A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus.

Authors:  J P De Wilde; A W Rivers; D L Price
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2005 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007.

Authors:  Emanuel Kanal; A James Barkovich; Charlotte Bell; James P Borgstede; William G Bradley; Jerry W Froelich; Tobias Gilk; J Rod Gimbel; John Gosbee; Ellisa Kuhni-Kaminski; James W Lester; John Nyenhuis; Yoav Parag; Daniel J Schaefer; Elizabeth A Sebek-Scoumis; Jeffrey Weinreb; Loren A Zaremba; Pamela Wilcox; Leonard Lucey; Nancy Sass
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Nonobstetric surgery in the parturient: anesthetic considerations.

Authors:  Krzysztof M Kuczkowski
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.452

4.  Reproductive outcome after anesthesia and operation during pregnancy: a registry study of 5405 cases.

Authors:  R I Mazze; B Källén
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  The Safety of Maternal and Fetal MRI at 3 T.

Authors:  Andre L Chartier; Monique J Bouvier; Danielle R McPherson; James E Stepenosky; Danielle A Taysom; Robert M Marks
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Serum relaxin, symphyseal pain, and back pain during pregnancy.

Authors:  P Kristiansson; K Svärdsudd; B von Schoultz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  The effect of nonobstetric operation during pregnancy.

Authors:  B Kort; V L Katz; W J Watson
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1993-10

Review 8.  Imaging the pregnant patient for nonobstetric conditions: algorithms and radiation dose considerations.

Authors:  Shital J Patel; Deborah L Reede; Douglas S Katz; Raja Subramaniam; Judith K Amorosa
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 9.  MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care.

Authors:  Frank G Shellock; John V Crues
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Pregnancy and the herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  M M LaBan; J C Perrin; F R Latimer
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  2 in total

1.  Microdiscectomy Under Local Anesthesia and Spinal Block in a Pregnant Female.

Authors:  Denis Babici; Phillip M Johansen; Stu L Newman; Timothy E O'Connor; Timothy D Miller
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-07

2.  Does the anesthesia technique of cesarean section cause persistent low back pain after delivery? A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Hizir Kazdal; Ayhan Kanat; Bulent Ozdemir; Vacide Ozdemir; Ali Riza Guvercin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 2.721

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.