Literature DB >> 3349236

Effects of codeine, morphine and a novel opioid pentapeptide BW443C, on cough, nociception and ventilation in the unanaesthetized guinea-pig.

J J Adcock1, C Schneider, T W Smith.   

Abstract

1. Antitussive, antinociceptive and respiratory depressant effects of codeine, morphine and H.Tyr.D-Arg.Gly.Phe(4-NO2) Pro.NH2 (compound BW443C) were investigated in unanaesthetized guinea-pigs. Antagonism of the antitussive and antinociceptive effects was investigated by the use of nalorphine and N-methylnalorphine. Naloxone was used to antagonize respiratory depression. 2. Antitussive ED50s (with 95% confidence limits) for inhibition of cough induced by citric acid vapour were for codeine, morphine and BW443C respectively, 9.1(5.8-15), 1.3(0.7-2.4) and 1.2(0.6-2.6) mg kg-1 s.c. and 8.7(4.2-12), 1.6(1.2-1.9) and 0.67(0.002-3.3) mg kg-1, i.v. The antitussive effects of subcutaneous codeine (25 mg kg-1) morphine (8.1 mg kg-1) and BW443C (2.5 mg kg-1) were significantly antagonized by subcutaneous nalorphine (3.0 mg kg-1) and N-methylnalorphine (3.0 mg kg-1). 3. In the multiple toe-pinch test, the antinociceptive ED50s (with 95% confidence limits) of codeine and morphine were 18(16-22) and 2.3(0.4-4.3) mg kg-1, s.c., respectively. Compound BW443C was ineffective in doses of 2.5 and 10 mg kg-1 s.c., a result consistent with its lacking penetration into the CNS. Subcutaneous nalorphine (3.0 mg kg-1) antagonized the antinociceptive action of codeine (25 mg kg-1) and morphine (8.1 mg kg-1). In contrast, N-methylnalorphine (3.0 mg kg-1) had no significant effect on the antinociceptive action of codeine and morphine, suggesting lack of penetration of the CNS by N-methylnalorphine. 4. At doses near to the i.v. ED50 values for the antitussive activity, morphine (1.5mg kg- ', i.v.) and codeine (10mg kg-', i.v.) caused small but significant depressions of ventilation (7.0 +/- 2.3% and 16.5 +/- 8.4% respectively). Higher doses of morphine (10, 30 and 60mg kg- ', i.v.) caused further doserelated depression of ventilation (9.6 +/- 5.3%, 22.4 +/- 6.2% and 36.2 +/- 9.6% respectively) whereas codeine (30 and 60mg kg-' i.v.) caused stimulation of ventilation which was marked (191.3 +/- 43.9%) at 60 mg kg-'. 5. Compound BW443C in doses of 1 or 10mgkg-',i.v. (approximately equal to, and 10 times the EDo for antitussive activity) did not cause significant depression of ventilation. Only at higher doses of 30 and 60mg kg-', i.v. was there a significant decrease in minute volume (13.1 +/- 6.8% and 15.9 +/- 1.89% respectively). The depression of ventilation caused by either BW443C (60mg kg-', i.v.) or morphine (60mg kg-', i.v.) was prevented by pretreatment with naloxone (3mg kg-', i.v.) administered 15 min before morphine or BW443C. 6. These results in the guinea-pig support the hypothesis that the antitussive action of the opiates codeine and morphine and the opioid pentapeptide BW443C do not require penetration of these drugs into the CNS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3349236      PMCID: PMC1853787          DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1988.tb11409.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  10 in total

1.  Mechanics of respiration in unanesthetized guinea pigs.

Authors:  M O AMDUR; J MEAD
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1958-02

2.  Central effects of antitussive drugs on cough and respiration.

Authors:  N K CHAKRAVARTY; A MATALLANA; R JENSEN; H L BORISON
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1956-06       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 3.  The use of quaternary narcotic antagonists in opiate research.

Authors:  D R Brown; L I Goldberg
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  The general pharmacology of a novel antitussive compound RU 20201.

Authors:  R W Pickering; G W James
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1979

5.  An antitussive test using guinea-pigs.

Authors:  A L Boura; A F Green; I A Saunders
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  The antitussive activity of a novel compound RU 20201.

Authors:  R W Pickering; G W James
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1979

Review 7.  Codeine and its alternates for pain and cough relief. 3. The antitussive action of codeine--mechanism, methodology and evaluation.

Authors:  N B Eddy; H Friebel; K J Hahn; H Halbach
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 9.408

8.  Multiple toe-pinch method for testing analgesic drugs.

Authors:  H O COLLIER; B T WARNER; R SKERRY
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol Chemother       Date:  1961-08

9.  Peripheral antinociceptive effects of N-methyl morphine.

Authors:  T W Smith; P Buchan; D N Parsons; S Wilkinson
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1982 Sep 20-27       Impact factor: 5.037

10.  The analgesic effect of quaternary analogues of morphine and nalorphine.

Authors:  B B Lorenzetti; S H Ferreira
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.590

  10 in total
  17 in total

Review 1.  Physiology and treatment of cough.

Authors:  R W Fuller; D M Jackson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Recommendations for the management of cough in adults.

Authors:  A H Morice; L McGarvey; I Pavord
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Participation of thromboxane A(2) in the cough response in guinea-pigs: antitussive effect of ozagrel.

Authors:  K Shinagawa; M Kojima; K Ichikawa; M Hiratochi; S Aoyagi; M Akahane
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 4.  Central mechanisms II: pharmacology of brainstem pathways.

Authors:  D C Bolser
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2009

5.  Antitussive effects of GABAB agonists in the cat and guinea-pig.

Authors:  D C Bolser; S M Aziz; F C DeGennaro; W Kreutner; R W Egan; M I Siegel; R W Chapman
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Incident opioid drug use among older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Nicholas T Vozoris; Xuesong Wang; Hadas D Fischer; Andrea S Gershon; Chaim M Bell; Sudeep S Gill; Denis E O'Donnell; Peter C Austin; Anne L Stephenson; Paula A Rochon
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Moguisteine: a novel peripheral non-narcotic antitussive drug.

Authors:  L Gallico; A Borghi; C Dalla Rosa; R Ceserani; S Tognella
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Peripheral analgesic blockade of hypernociception: activation of arginine/NO/cGMP/protein kinase G/ATP-sensitive K+ channel pathway.

Authors:  Daniela Sachs; Fernando Q Cunha; Sérgio H Ferreira
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Current and future centrally acting antitussives.

Authors:  Donald C Bolser
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 1.931

10.  RSD931, a novel anti-tussive agent acting on airway sensory nerves.

Authors:  J J Adcock; G J Douglas; M Garabette; M Gascoigne; G Beatch; M Walker; C P Page
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.