Literature DB >> 33491943

Systematic review of guidelines to identify recommendations for upper limb robotic rehabilitation after stroke.

Giovanni Morone1, Angela Palomba2, Alex Martino Cinnera3, Michela Agostini4, Irene Aprile5, Chiara Arienti6, Matteo Paci7, Emanuela Casanova8, Dario Marino9, Giuseppe LA Rosa10, Federica Bressi11, Silvia Sterzi11, Marialuisa Gandolfi12, Daniele Giansanti13, Luca Perrero14, Alberto Battistini15, Sandra Miccinilli11, Serena Filoni16, Monica Sicari17, Salvatore Petrozzino17, Claudio Marcello Solaro18, Stefano Gargano19, Paolo Benanti20, Paolo Boldrini21, Donatella Bonaiuti22, Enrico Castelli23, Francesco Draicchio24, Vincenzo Falabella25, Silvia Galeri6, Francesca Gimigliano26, Mauro Grigioni13, Stefano Mazzoleni27, Stefano Mazzon28, Franco Molteni29, Maurizio Petrarca30, Alessandro Picelli12, Federico Posteraro31, Michele Senatore32, Giuseppe Turchetti33, Sofia Straudi34.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Upper limb motor impairment is one of the most frequent stroke consequences. Robot therapy may represent a valid option for upper limb stroke rehabilitation, but there are still gaps between research evidence and their use in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine the quality, scope, and consistency of guidelines clinical practice recommendations for upper limb robotic rehabilitation in stroke populations. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched for guideline recommendations on stroke published between January 1st, 2010 and January 1st, 2020. Only the most recent guidelines for writing group were selected. Electronic databases (N.=4), guideline repertories and professional rehabilitation networks (N.=12) were searched. We systematically reviewed and assessed guidelines containing recommendation statements about upper limb robotic rehabilitation for adults with stroke (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020173386). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Four independent reviewers used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument, and textual syntheses were used to appraise and compare recommendations. From 1324 papers that were screened, eight eligible guidelines were identified from six different regions/countries. Half of the included guidelines focused on stroke management, the other half on stroke rehabilitation. Rehabilitation assisted by robotic devices is generally recommended to improve upper limb motor function and strength. The exact characteristics of patients who could benefit from this treatment as well as the correct timing to use it are not known.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review has identified many opportunities to modernize and otherwise improve stroke patients' upper limb robotic therapy. Rehabilitation assisted by robot or electromechanical devices for stroke needs to be improved in clinical practice guidelines in particular in terms of applicability.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33491943     DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06625-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1973-9087            Impact factor:   2.874


  2 in total

Review 1.  Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation for Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Giovanni Morone; Alessandro de Sire; Alex Martino Cinnera; Matteo Paci; Luca Perrero; Marco Invernizzi; Lorenzo Lippi; Michela Agostini; Irene Aprile; Emanuela Casanova; Dario Marino; Giuseppe La Rosa; Federica Bressi; Silvia Sterzi; Daniele Giansanti; Alberto Battistini; Sandra Miccinilli; Serena Filoni; Monica Sicari; Salvatore Petrozzino; Claudio Marcello Solaro; Stefano Gargano; Paolo Benanti; Paolo Boldrini; Donatella Bonaiuti; Enrico Castelli; Francesco Draicchio; Vincenzo Falabella; Silvia Galeri; Francesca Gimigliano; Mauro Grigioni; Stefano Mazzoleni; Stefano Mazzon; Franco Molteni; Maurizio Petrarca; Alessandro Picelli; Marialuisa Gandolfi; Federico Posteraro; Michele Senatore; Giuseppe Turchetti; Sofia Straudi
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-10

2.  Opportunities and Problems of the Consensus Conferences in the Care Robotics.

Authors:  Giovanni Maccioni; Selene Ruscitto; Rosario Alfio Gulino; Daniele Giansanti
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.