Hirosato Kanda1,2, Sotatsu Tonomura1, Yi Dai2, Jianguo G Gu1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. 2. Department of Pharmacology, Hyogo University of Health Sciences, Kobe, Hyogo 650-8530, Japan.
Abstract
The patch-clamp recording technique is indispensable for studying ion channel functions of cells but is challenging to apply to the node of Ranvier, a key site where action potentials are conducted along myelinated nerves. We have developed a pressure-clamped patch-clamp recording method applying to the node of Ranvier of rat myelinated nerves. The step-by-step protocol described here allows researchers to apply this approach to study mechanisms underlying saltatory conduction and information processing in myelinated nerves of mammals. For complete information on the generation and use of this protocol, please refer to Kanda et al. (2019).
The patch-clamp recording technique is indispensable for studying ion channel functions of cells but is challenging to apply to the node of Ranvier, a key site where action potentials are conducted along myelinated nerves. We have developed a pressure-clamped patch-clamp recording method applying to the node of Ranvier of rat myelinated nerves. The step-by-step protocol described here allows researchers to apply this approach to study mechanisms underlying saltatory conduction and information processing in myelinated nerves of mammals. For complete information on the generation and use of this protocol, please refer to Kanda et al. (2019).
Timing: 30 minPrepare all solutions listed in the Materials and Equipment section and prepare the equipment set-up for patch-clamp recording (Figure 1) before starting this protocol.
Figure 1
Main components of the pressure-clamped patch-clamp recording system
Diagram illustrates the main components of the pressure-clamped patch-clamp recording system. It consists of (I) an Olympus BX51 microscope equipped with infra-red differential interference contrast (IR-DIC) and fluorescent imaging systems; (II) a patch-clamp recording system with an Axopatch 200B amplifier and a recording head stage (a); (III) a high-speed pressure-clamp (HSPC) device containing an HSPC controller unit and an HSPC head stage; and (IV) a custom-made recording chamber. The HSPC head stage is connected via silicon tubing to the holder of the patch-clamp recording pipette so that the pressure within the recording pipette can be adjusted to a desired level. In addition, a glass syringe is also connected via silicon tubing to the recording pipette holder, which is mainly used to manually apply positive pressures into the recording pipette to push air bubbles out of the recording pipette as a beginning step of each experiment. In this setup a suction stimulation electrode (b) is also included for experiments to evoke nerve impulses from a distal end of the nerve bundle.
The high-speed pressure-clamp (HSPC) device is connected to the holder of the patch-clamp recording pipette to allow a fine control of the pressures within the patch-clamp recording pipette (Figure 1).Prepare 2 mL ice-cold Leibovitz’s L-15 (L-15) medium in a 35 × 10-mm petri dish.Oxygenate 400 mL of the Krebs bath solution with a mixture of 5% CO2 and 95% O2 before and during the experiment.Pull recording pipettes that have pipette resistances ranging from 8 to 10 MΩ after filling approximately 15 μL recording electrode internal solution.Main components of the pressure-clamped patch-clamp recording systemDiagram illustrates the main components of the pressure-clamped patch-clamp recording system. It consists of (I) an Olympus BX51 microscope equipped with infra-red differential interference contrast (IR-DIC) and fluorescent imaging systems; (II) a patch-clamp recording system with an Axopatch 200B amplifier and a recording head stage (a); (III) a high-speed pressure-clamp (HSPC) device containing an HSPC controller unit and an HSPC head stage; and (IV) a custom-made recording chamber. The HSPC head stage is connected via silicon tubing to the holder of the patch-clamp recording pipette so that the pressure within the recording pipette can be adjusted to a desired level. In addition, a glass syringe is also connected via silicon tubing to the recording pipette holder, which is mainly used to manually apply positive pressures into the recording pipette to push air bubbles out of the recording pipette as a beginning step of each experiment. In this setup a suction stimulation electrode (b) is also included for experiments to evoke nerve impulses from a distal end of the nerve bundle.
Key resources table
Alternative recording chambers are commercially available, for example, the Series 20 chamber, Warner Instruments, www.warneronline.com
Materials and equipment
Krebs bath solution (pH 7.35, 324 mOsm), 1,000 mLThe pH is adjusted to pH 7.35 with HCl.The osmolality is adjusted to 324 mOsm with sucrose.The Krebs bath solution is stored at 4°C before it is used in experiments. The Krebs bath solution should be newly prepared after being stored in the refrigerator for 5 days.The Krebs bath solution is saturated by a mixture of 95% O2 plus 5% of CO2 at the room temperature of 24°C when it is used during recordings.Recording electrode internal solution (pH 7.35, 330 mOsm), 50 mLThe pH is adjusted to pH 7.35 with KOH.The osmolality is adjusted to 330 mOsm with sucrose.Prepare the recording electrode internal solution on ice, aliquot it into 1-mL stock solution in 1.5-mL micro-centrifuge tubes, and store it in −20°C freezer before using the solution. The recording electrode internal solution should be newly prepared after being stored in the freezer for one month.Enzyme stock solution of a mixture of dispase and collagenase, 5 mLPrepare the enzyme solution on ice, aliquot it into 150 μL stock solution in 0.5-mL micro-centrifuge tubes, and store all aliquots at −20°C.The enzyme stock solution should be discarded after being stored in the freezer for 1 month.
Step-by-step method details
Surgery and nerve preparation
Timing: 30 minAdd 2 mL of ice-cold L-15 medium in a 35 × 10-mm petri dish.Euthanize the rat with an overdose of isoflurane followed by decapitation with a pair of surgical scissors.Quickly remove the nerves to be studied from rats.Infraorbital nerves (IONs) dissectionMake an incision in the middle of head skin by a pair of surgical scissors.Open the skulls with a pair of luer bone rongeur.After exposing cortex, cut the brainstem at the transverse cerebral fissure by a pair of fine forceps, and remove the cortex to expose trigeminal ganglions (TGs) underneath the midbrain.Open the round foramen and infraorbital foramen by a pair of luer bone rongeur forceps to expose infraorbital branches of the trigeminal nerves (infraorbital nerve, IONs) with TG (Figure 2B).
Figure 2
Preparations of infraorbital branches of the trigeminal nerves, ventral nerves of the spinal cord, and sciatic nerves
(A) Schematic diagram illustrates the locations in the body of the infraorbital branch of the trigeminal nerve (infraorbital nerve, ION), spinal lumbar 5 (L5) ventral nerve, spinal nerve, and sciatic nerves of the rat.
(B and C) Images show the anatomy that exposes the infraorbital nerve (B) and a complex of L5 ventral nerve, spinal nerve, and sciatic nerves (C) in a rat.
(D and E) Images show a freshly dissected infraorbital nerve bundle with their trigeminal ganglion (D) and a complex of the L5 ventral nerve, spinal nerve, and sciatic nerves (E). The complex also contains the L5 dorsal root ganglion (DRG). In patch-clamp recording experiments, a nerve bundle such as L5 ventral nerve can be dissected out without having the other nerve component connected if recordings are only performed on that nerve bundle. Scale bar, 3 mm.
Preparations of infraorbital branches of the trigeminal nerves, ventral nerves of the spinal cord, and sciatic nerves(A) Schematic diagram illustrates the locations in the body of the infraorbital branch of the trigeminal nerve (infraorbital nerve, ION), spinal lumbar 5 (L5) ventral nerve, spinal nerve, and sciatic nerves of the rat.(B and C) Images show the anatomy that exposes the infraorbital nerve (B) and a complex of L5 ventral nerve, spinal nerve, and sciatic nerves (C) in a rat.(D and E) Images show a freshly dissected infraorbital nerve bundle with their trigeminal ganglion (D) and a complex of the L5 ventral nerve, spinal nerve, and sciatic nerves (E). The complex also contains the L5 dorsal root ganglion (DRG). In patch-clamp recording experiments, a nerve bundle such as L5 ventral nerve can be dissected out without having the other nerve component connected if recordings are only performed on that nerve bundle. Scale bar, 3 mm.Carefully cut open the connective tissues that surround the IONs by using a micro scissors.Gently dissect out and harvest the IONs together with their TGs (Figure 2D).Ventral nerves, spinal nerve, and sciatic nerves dissectionRemove the spinae muscles by using a pair of luer bone rongeur forceps.Open the spine through the Th1 to S1 levels and expose the spinal cord.Identify a L5 DRG and follow the L5 peripheral nerve down to the knee level (Figure 2C).Harvest the complex of the sciatic, spinal, and ventral nerves from the rat (Figure 2E).CRITICAL: We recommend to keep nerve bundles moisturized by periodically applying drops of ice-cold L-15 medium on the nerves during the aforementioned nerve dissection procedures. During harvesting of the nerve bundles, avoid to stretch the nerve fibers since a strong stretch may lead to a mechanical damage of nerve fibers to potentially cause acute nerve demyelination.Place the nerves into a 35 × 10-mm petri dish that contains 2 mL ice-cold L-15 medium and keep the petri dish on ice.At this point, when kept in the ice-cold (4°C) L-15 medium, the nerve preparations can be maintained healthy for up to 10 h.Under a stereoscopic microscope, carefully peel off the connective tissues including blood vessels, fibrofatty tissue, and epineurium on the surface of the nerve bundles with a pair of fine forceps.The connective tissues on the surface of the nerve bundles are observed as shown in the Figure 2D.Avoid strongly stretching or compressing the nerves with the forceps during this procedure.Add 1,350 μL of oxygenated Krebs bath solution into the recording chamber.Affix one nerve preparation in a recording chamber with a tissue anchor and submerge it in the Krebs solution at the room temperature of 24°C.Mount the recording chamber on the stage of the microscope, and adjust the nerve bundle orientation so that it is oriented perpendicular to the tip of the patch-clamp recording pipette.If the conduction velocity of a single myelinated fiber is going to be measured, at this point, one can aspirate a peripheral cutting end of the nerve bundle into a suction electrode, and electrical stimulation can later be delivered through the suction electrode to evoke nerve impulses to allow to determine nerve conduction velocity.Add 150 μL of the dispase-collagenase enzyme solution directly into the recording chamber and mix the enzymes with the Krebs solution well by pipetting up and down. Incubate the nerve bundle with the enzyme solution at the room temperature of 24°C for 5 min. The final concentrations of each enzyme are 0.07% in the Krebs solution.Wash off the enzyme solution by continuously perfusing the nerve preparation with the oxygenated Krebs bath solution at 2 mL/min.
Node of Ranvier identification
Timing: 5 minIdentify a healthy node of Ranvier for pressure-clamped patch-clamp recordings (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Identifying a health node of Ranvier for pressure-clamped patch-clamp recordings
(A) Image shows a segment of an infraorbital nerve bundle viewed under a 40× objective. Arrows indicate the healthy nodes that shows very small gap at each node.
(B) Image shows a segment of a different infraorbital nerve bundle viewed under a 40× objective. Arrowheads indicate two unhealthy nodes that show a large gap at each node. Scale bar, 10 μm.
CRITICAL: A healthy myelinated nerve fiber has a narrow space between myelin sheaths at the node of Ranvier (Figure 3A) and we recommend to apply patch-clamp recordings to the healthy nodes of Ranvier in experiments. If a larger gap between myelin sheaths is shown at a node of Ranvier of a nerve fiber, it indicates that some degree of nerve damage may have occurred during nerve preparation (Figure 3B). If many fibers have this type of morphological changes at their nodes of Ranvier, we recommend to discard the nerve bundle and try to obtain a new and healthy nerve bundle.Identifying a health node of Ranvier for pressure-clamped patch-clamp recordings(A) Image shows a segment of an infraorbital nerve bundle viewed under a 40× objective. Arrows indicate the healthy nodes that shows very small gap at each node.(B) Image shows a segment of a different infraorbital nerve bundle viewed under a 40× objective. Arrowheads indicate two unhealthy nodes that show a large gap at each node. Scale bar, 10 μm.
Pressure-clamped patch-clamp recordings at nodes of Ranvier
Timing: 10 minProcedures of the pressure-clamped patch-clamp recording at the node of Ranvier are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4
Procedures of pressure-clamped patch-clamp recording at the node of Ranvier
(A) Identify a healthy node for the pressure-clamped patch-clamp recording.
(B) The tip of the recording pipette approaches the node of Ranvier. The intra- pipette pressure is initially 200 mmHg and adjusted to 80–100 mmHg when the recording pipette tip reach the perineurium tissue at the node of Ranvier.
(C) The tip of the pipette penetrates the perineurium that surrounds the node of Ranvier. At this point, reduce the intra-pipette pressure to 5 mmHg.
(D) Adjust the position of the recording pipette tip and apply a negative pressure (−2 to −10 mmHg) in the recording pipette to obtain gigaohm seal. The asterisk in the image indicates the tip of the recording pipette.
(E) An example of membrane responses when the tip of the recording pipette approaches to Schwann cell membranes (middle panel) or to nodal axon membranes (right panel). The left panel shows the baseline holding current before the recording pipette tip approaches membranes. Scale bar, 10 μm.
Prepare the patch-clamp recording pipettes that have electrode resistances ranging from 8 to 10 MΩ after filling the pipette with recording electrode internal solution.Choose a healthy node of Ranvier in the nerve bundle (Figure 4A).Fill a pipette with recording electrode internal solution by using a syringe that is attached with a 0.22-μm syringe filter.Enter the pipette into the bath solution and adjust electrode offset at the holding potential of 0 mV.Apply a high positive pressure of 200 mmHg into the recording pipette by using the HSPC and bring the pipette closer to the node of Ranvier within 5–10 μm (Figure 4B).It is difficult to insert the recording pipette tip into the nerve fiber layer if nerve fibers are still covered by some connective tissues. Return to step 4 and peel off connective tissues carefully with a pair of fine forceps.CRITICAL: Pay attention and make sure that there is no air leakage in the pressure- clamped patch-clamp recording system and that the positive pressure is well maintained in the recording pipette. The pressure should stay stable, and there is a leak if the pressure drops. Also make sure that the tip of the recording pipette is not blocked by small particles that may be present in the recording electrode internal solution.Reduce the positive pressure to 80–100 mmHg and advance the recording pipette tip to approach the node of Ranvier horizontally from one side of the node of Ranvier.Slowly penetrate the perineurium that wraps around the nodal axon (Figure 4C).It may take several attempts with forward-backward-forward movement of the recording pipette tip to penetrate the perineurium at the node of Ranvier. After the pipette tip successfully penetrates the perineurium, one can see that there is an immediate expansion in the space between myelin and perineurium. This change may be due to the flowing of the recording electrode internal solution into the space.Quickly reduce the positive pressure to 5 mmHg in the recording pipette using the high-speed pressure-clamp device and then change the command holding potential of the recording electrode to −60 mV.Slightly advance the tip of the recording pipette to approach and make a contact with the nodal axon (Figure 4D).CRITICAL: Since axonal membrane is unable to be clearly differentiated from perineural tissues and Schwann cell membranes under the IR-DIC microscope, accessing axonal membranes with the recording pipette tip is mainly judged by the reduction of seal-test currents. Once touching axonal membranes, one can see a strong current oscillation accompanied with the reduction of seal-test currents in seal-test traces (Figure 4E). On the other hand, if the recording pipette tip touches Schwann cell membranes, current oscillation is usually very weak or absent, although seal-test currents become reduced as well (Figure 4E). After the penetration of perineurium, the tip of the recording pipette should be very close to the nodal axon (Figure 4E). To contact the nodal axon membranes, one only needs to slightly adjust the position of the recording pipette tip up and down in less than 1 μm until seeing the aforementioned changes of seal-test currents.Gently push (1–2 μm) against the nodal axon with the tip of the recording electrode to allow the resistance of the seal test to increase to approximately 15 MΩ. This allows the recording pipette tip to optimally contact nodal membranes.Gradually reduce the positive pressures in the recording pipette to negative pressures of −2 to −10 mmHg in approximately 10 s.Wait for 30 s to 3 min until the formation of gigaohm seals (usually >5 GΩ) between the recording pipette and the axonal membranes at the node of Ranvier.Compensate the pipette capacitance before rupturing nodal axon membranes to form the whole-cell recording configuration.At this point, one may perform single-channel recordings from the nodal axon membranes using the cell-attached recording configuration.Rupture the nodal axon membranes by applying a negative pressure of −30 mmHg combined with a train of short electrical pulses (± 200 mV, 20 ms each pulses) delivered to the nodal of Ranvier via the patch-clamp recording pipette.Axonal membranes at the node of Ranvier usually can be ruptured by the short electrical pulses in less than 100 pulses leading to the whole-cell patch-clamp recording configuration. On the other hand, Schwann cells seems to have tougher cell membranes and require more than 300 times of electrical pulses to rapture their membranes to form the whole-cell patch-clamp recording configuration.After establishing the whole-cell patch-clamp recording configuration, quickly adjust the negative pressure from −30 mmHg to −5 mmHg. Keeping the lower negative pressure of −5 mmHg in the recording pipette can prevent nodal axon membranes from reseal at the recording pipette tip during experiments.Stable recordings usually can last for more than 1 h.The actual holding potential under the whole-cell patch-clamp recording configuration is −72 mV after the command holding potential of −60 mV is corrected for the junction potential of 12 mV.CRITICAL: If recording electrode access resistance is increased over time after establishing the whole-cell patch-clamp recording configuration, it could be due to the gradual membrane reseal at the tip of the recording pipette. Return to step 22 and rupture the membrane again.Procedures of pressure-clamped patch-clamp recording at the node of Ranvier(A) Identify a healthy node for the pressure-clamped patch-clamp recording.(B) The tip of the recording pipette approaches the node of Ranvier. The intra- pipette pressure is initially 200 mmHg and adjusted to 80–100 mmHg when the recording pipette tip reach the perineurium tissue at the node of Ranvier.(C) The tip of the pipette penetrates the perineurium that surrounds the node of Ranvier. At this point, reduce the intra-pipette pressure to 5 mmHg.(D) Adjust the position of the recording pipette tip and apply a negative pressure (−2 to −10 mmHg) in the recording pipette to obtain gigaohm seal. The asterisk in the image indicates the tip of the recording pipette.(E) An example of membrane responses when the tip of the recording pipette approaches to Schwann cell membranes (middle panel) or to nodal axon membranes (right panel). The left panel shows the baseline holding current before the recording pipette tip approaches membranes. Scale bar, 10 μm.
Expected outcomes
We have described above in detail the experimental steps of applying pressure- clamped patch-clamp recording technique to the axon at a single node of Ranvier in rat myelinated fiber. After establishing the whole-cell patch-clamp configuration on the axonal membrane at the node of Ranvier, one can also trace and characterize the morphological properties of the myelinated axon including diameters and lengths of nodes of Ranvier and inter-nodal distances if recording electrode internal solution also contains the fluorescent dye Alexa 555 at the concentration of 85 μM (Figure 5A).
Figure 5
An example of a successful pressure-clamped patch-clamp recording at the node of Ranvier of a myelinated nerve fiber
The recording is made from a myelinated nerve fiber in a rat infraorbital nerve bundle and the recording electrode internal solution also contains the fluorescent dye Alexa-555.
(A) Fluorescent image shows a long axon labeled by Alexa-555 following a successful pressure-clamped patch-clamp recording in the whole-cell configuration. The tip of the patch-clamp recording pipette points to a node of Ranvier where the recording is made. Arrows indicate other nodes of Ranvier along the nerve fibers. The asterisk in the middle of the image indicates the tissue anchor used to affix the nerve bundle in the recording chamber. Scale bar, 100 μm.
(B) Traces show currents recorded at a node of Ranvier in response to voltage steps from −102 mV to 58 mV in an increment of 10 mV each step.
(C) Traces show action potentials recorded at a node of Ranvier following the injections of depolarizing currents from the patch-clamp recording electrode. Red and gray traces in C are membrane responses to the injections of step currents at the rheobase and 2× rheobase levels, respectively.
An example of a successful pressure-clamped patch-clamp recording at the node of Ranvier of a myelinated nerve fiberThe recording is made from a myelinated nerve fiber in a rat infraorbital nerve bundle and the recording electrode internal solution also contains the fluorescent dye Alexa-555.(A) Fluorescent image shows a long axon labeled by Alexa-555 following a successful pressure-clamped patch-clamp recording in the whole-cell configuration. The tip of the patch-clamp recording pipette points to a node of Ranvier where the recording is made. Arrows indicate other nodes of Ranvier along the nerve fibers. The asterisk in the middle of the image indicates the tissue anchor used to affix the nerve bundle in the recording chamber. Scale bar, 100 μm.(B) Traces show currents recorded at a node of Ranvier in response to voltage steps from −102 mV to 58 mV in an increment of 10 mV each step.(C) Traces show action potentials recorded at a node of Ranvier following the injections of depolarizing currents from the patch-clamp recording electrode. Red and gray traces in C are membrane responses to the injections of step currents at the rheobase and 2× rheobase levels, respectively.A high-quality recording from nodal axon membranes should show very negative resting potential at approximately −82 mV at the node of Ranvier. Input resistance is approximately 40 MΩ when recorded at the node of Ranvier of Aβ fibers of ION and approximately 35 MΩ when recorded at the node of Ranvier of Aα motor nerve fibers.Under the voltage-clamp configuration, we have detected transient inward currents mediated by the voltage-gated Na+ channels and large non-inactivating outward currents mediated by TREK-1 and TRAAK channels in responses to depolarizing voltage steps (Figure 5B) (Kanda et al., 2019). Under the current-clamp configuration, we can elicit action potential firing at the node of Ranvier following the injection of depolarizing currents (Figure 5C) or following the electrical stimulation of the peripheral sites of the nerve bundle by a suction stimulation electrode (Kanda et al., 2019).Some functional characteristics of nodal axon membrane at the node of Ranvier of ION have been described in our recent paper published in Neuron using this new recording technique (Kanda et al., 2019). The STAR protocol described here allows one to apply this new approach to investigate ion channels and their functions at nodes of Ranvier of different nerves. The pressure-clamped patch-clamp recording technique may also be used in conjunction with genetic and molecular biology approaches to advance our understanding of mechanisms underlying action potential conduction and information processing in different types of nervous systems.
Limitations
Our pressure-clamped patch-clamp recording method is applicable for the nodes of Ranvier of Aα motor nerve fibers and Aβ sensory nerve fibers in rats. Other types of myelinated fibers, including Aδ fibers in sensory nerves and myelinated fibers in the central nervous system, may be too thin in their nodal axon diameters to be easily approached by the recording pipette. At present time, it is not certain if this new recording method is also applicable to the thinner nerve fibers.Recording pipettes with small tip sizes have to be used in order to access to and make patch-clamp recordings from the axonal membranes at the node of Ranvier. The resistance of these recording pipettes usually is in the range of 8 to 10 MΩ. The higher resistance of the recording pipettes will result in a larger voltage-clamp error. Therefore, one should take the consideration of the voltage-clamp error when interpreting voltage-clamp recording data obtained using our pressure-clamped patch- clamp recording technique.This protocol has only been applied to rat myelinated nerves. While it might be applicable to the myelinated nerves of other species including mice, this possibility remains to be tested.
Troubleshooting
Problem 1
Nerve fibers are not healthy as manifested by a large gap at the node of Ranvier (step 10).
Potential solution
Make sure that nerve fibers are not over-stretched during making nerve preparations. In most cases, nerve fibers are damaged in the step 4 of removing connective tissues that surround nerve bundles. It is not necessary to completely remove all connective tissues that surround nerve bundles so that the potential nerve damage can be minimized.
Problem 2
Difficult to penetrate through perineurium that surround the axon at the node of Ranvier (step 15).Check the enzyme to make sure that the stock solution is stored at −20°C for less than 1 month. Increase the enzyme treatment time.
Problem 3
Recording pipettes seal onto Schwann cell membranes rather than onto nodal axon membranes (step 17).Make sure that the tip of the recording pipette penetrates the perineurium right at the node of Ranvier. If the tip of the recording pipette is slightly off from the center of the node of Ranvier, the recording pipette tip will most likely seal onto Schwann cell membranes. It is also important to search nodal axon membranes very carefully by moving the pipette tip within the distance range of 1 μm from the original tip entering point. There is usually large current oscillation in seal test when the recording pipette tip touches axonal membranes. On the other hand, current oscillation in the seal test is not obvious when the recording pipette tip touches Schwann cell membranes.
Problem 4
Cannot form a gigaohm seal on the nodal axon membrane with the recording pipette (step 20).Because the tip of the recording pipette needs to penetrate perineurium, it is essential to have positive pressures within the recording pipette before the tip of the pipette makes a close contact with nodal axon membranes to form a gigaohm seal. Air leakage in the pressure-clamp patch-clamp recording system is a common problem to prevent the recording electrode from forming a gigaohm seal onto axon membranes at the node of Ranvier. Make sure that there is no air leakage from the tubing, connectors, the recording pipette holder, and the HSPC system.We also recommend to filter the recording electrode internal solution with a 0.22-μm syringe filter to remove the dust particles in the solution so that the tip of the recording pipette will not be clogged by the dust particles. Clogged recording pipette tip will not be able to form a gigaohm seal on nodal axon membranes and should be discarded.
Problem 5
Electrode access resistances become gradually increased over time during recordings (step 24).One cause of the increase in the electrode access resistance is due to partial membrane reseal at the tip of the recording pipette. One will need to reopen the membrane seal in the manner described in step 22. Another common cause of the increase in the electrode access resistance is due to the drift of the tip of the recording pipette. To solve this problem, one needs to check the setups for holding (pipette holder, etc.) and controlling (micromanipulator, etc.) the recording pipette to improve the stability of the setups. If the pipette drift is mild, one can move the recording pipette tip back to the original position, which often can bring the access resistance back to the original level.Optimizing enzyme treatment is needed for different types of nerves and also for the same type of nerves from animals at different ages. When nerves are optimally treated with the enzymes, it is relatively easy to have recording pipette penetrate through the perineurium and reach to the axonal membranes at the nodal of Ranvier. Insufficient treatment of nerve bundles with the enzymes makes it difficult to penetrate the perineurium. Over-treatment by the enzymes makes the targeted nerve fiber slip away from the tip of the positively pressured recording pipette. One should experiment with the time of the enzyme treatment or concentrations of the enzymes for different nerves to obtain optimal conditions.
Resource availability
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Jianguo Gu [jianguogu@uabmc.edu].
Materials availability
There are no restrictions on any data or materials presented in this paper. This study did not generate new unique reagents.
Data and code availability
This study did not generate any unique datasets or code.
REAGENT or RESOURCE
SOURCE
IDENTIFIER
Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins
Isoflurane
Vet One
Cat#V1-502017
NaCl
MilliporeSigma
Cat#S9625
KCl
MilliporeSigma
Cat#P4504
CaCl2
MilliporeSigma
Cat#C3881
MgCl2
MilliporeSigma
Cat#M0250
NaH2PO4
MilliporeSigma
Cat#S381
NaHCO3
MilliporeSigma
Cat#S5761
Glucose
MilliporeSigma
Cat#G7021
K-gluconate
MilliporeSigma
Cat#G4500
HEPES
MilliporeSigma
Cat#H3375
Na2ATP
MilliporeSigma
Cat#A6419
GTP-TRIS salt
MilliporeSigma
Cat#51120
EGTA
MilliporeSigma
Cat#E4378
Alexa Fluor 555
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Cat#A20501MP
Dispase II
Roche
Cat#11534200
Collagenase
MilliporeSigma
Cat#C0130
Leibovitz’s L-15 medium
Corning cellgro
Cat#10-045-CV
Experimental models: organisms/strains
Sprague-Dawley rats of both sexes (5–7 weeks old)
Envigo
Cat#Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD
Software and algorithms
pCLAMP10
Molecular Devices
www.moleculardevices.com
Metafluor
Molecular Devices
www.moleculardevices.com
Other
Olympus BX50 microscope with DIC and fluorescent system
Olympus
www.olympus-lifescience.com
40× water immersion objective
Olympus
Cat#LUMPLFLN40XW
Axopatch 200B
Molecular Devices
www.moleculardevices.com
Axon Digidata 1320A
Molecular Devices
www.moleculardevices.com
Vibration isolation table (63-500 series)
TMC Vibration Control
www.techmfg.com
Micromanipulator
Sutter Instrument Company
Cat#MPC325
Tissue anchor
Warner Instruments
Cat#WI 64-1413
Glass capillary (thin wall, 4 inch, OD 1.5 mm, filament)
World Precision Instruments
Cat#TW150F-4
Recording chamber
Custom made
n/a
Master-8 Stimulator
A.M.P.I
www.ampi.co.il
Syringe filters (0.22 μm)
Research Products International
Cat#256130
High-speed pressure-clamp device
ALA Scientific instruments
https://alascience.com
Flaming/Brown micropipette puller
Shutter Instruments
Cat#P-97
Fine forceps
Fine Science Tools
Dumont #7
Micro scissors
World Precision Instruments
Cat#501778
Luer bone rongeur forceps
Roboz Surgical Store
Cat#RS-83-06
Krebs bath solution (pH 7.35, 324 mOsm), 1,000 mL
Reagent
Final concentration (mM)
Amount
NaCl
117
6.84 g
KCl
3.5
0.26 g
CaCl2
2.5
0.36 g
MgCl2
1.2
0.24 g
NaH2PO4
1.2
0.19 g
NaHCO3
25
2.1 g
Glucose
11
1.98 g
ddH2O
n/a
Add to 1,000 mL
Total
n/a
1,000 mL
Recording electrode internal solution (pH 7.35, 330 mOsm), 50 mL
Reagent
Final concentration (mM)
Amount
K-gluconate
105
1.23 g
KCl
30
111.8 mg
CaCl2
0.5
24.3 mg
MgCl2
2.4
3.68 mg
EGTA
5
95.1 mg
HEPES
10
119.2 mg
Na2ATP
5
95.1 mg
GTP-trisodium salt
0.33
137.8 mg
ddH2O
n/a
Add to 50 mL
Total
n/a
50 mL
Enzyme stock solution of a mixture of dispase and collagenase, 5 mL