Chang Rok Kim1, Taichi Noda2, Yuki Okada3, Masahito Ikawa2,4, Sung Hee Baek1. 1. Research Center for Epigenetic Code and Diseases, Department of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, South Korea. 2. Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. 3. Laboratory of Pathology and Development, Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan. 4. The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan.
Abstract
Post-meiotic spermatids become spermatozoa through developmental stages during spermiogenesis. Isolation of spermatid fractions is required to examine the change of protein expression during spermiogenesis. Here, we present a simple method to isolate spermatid fractions from mouse testes using unit gravity sedimentation in a BSA density gradient. Isolation of spermatid fractions can be used to analyze changes of transcript or protein during spermiogenesis. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Kim et al. (2020).
Post-meiotic spermatids become spermatozoa through developmental stages during spermiogenesis. Isolation of spermatid fractions is required to examine the change of protein expression during spermiogenesis. Here, we present a simple method to isolate spermatid fractions from mouse testes using unit gravity sedimentation in a BSA density gradient. Isolation of spermatid fractions can be used to analyze changes of transcript or protein during spermiogenesis. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Kim et al. (2020).
Spermatogenesis includes the dramatic alternation of morphology of spermatogenic cells, leading to difference in size and density of each developmental stages. Several methods such as STA-PUT and elutriation have been developed to separate different stages of spermatogenic cells by their size and density in the BSA density gradient (Bellvé et al., 1977; Bryant et al., 2013; Chang et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2017). Also, FACS has been used for the same goal using antibody against surface antigen and difference in ploidy (Lima et al., 2017; Okada et al., 2007). However, previous methods are difficult to perform due to complicated steps of experiment. Here, we modify classical STA-PUT and provide a simpler protocol.Before the preparation of testis single-cell suspension from mice, prepare the BSA density gradient.
BSA density gradient
Timing: ~1 hPrepare 4% BSA, 2% BSA, and 0.5% BSA solution in DMEM: F12 mediaTo check the stacking of solution with different concentrations of BSA, we used DMEM: F12 media with/without phenol red. 4% BSA and 0.5% BSA were solved in red DMEM: F12 media and 2% BSA was solved in colorless DMEM: F12 media. As the color of BSA was yellow, the color of the BSA solutions changed according to the concentration of BSA: 4% BSA (orange), 2% BSA (yellow), and 0.5% BSA (red). We used 100 mL disposable syringe as sedimentation column.Pour 40 mL of 4% BSA into sedimentation column slowly using serological pipette.Pour 40 mL of 2% BSA into the tube above the sedimentation column. Flow 2% BSA to the wall of column at 2 mL/min to stack over 4% BSA using connecting tube (Figures 1A and 1B).
Figure 1
Schematic representation of BSA density gradient sedimentation
(A) Schematic representation of unit gravity sedimentation.
(B) The image of apparatus for unit gradient sedimentation.
(C) The image of incorporation of 0.5% BSA over 2% BSA using a serological pipette.
(D) View of BSA density gradient. 4% BSA (bottom, orange), 2% BSA (middle, yellow), and 0.5% BSA (top, red) are stacked in a sedimentation column.
Schematic representation of BSA density gradient sedimentation(A) Schematic representation of unit gravity sedimentation.(B) The image of apparatus for unit gradient sedimentation.(C) The image of incorporation of 0.5% BSA over 2% BSA using a serological pipette.(D) View of BSA density gradient. 4% BSA (bottom, orange), 2% BSA (middle, yellow), and 0.5% BSA (top, red) are stacked in a sedimentation column.Flow 3 mL of 0.5% BSA to the wall of column using serological pipette over 2% BSA (Figure 1C).CRITICAL: To prevent the incorporation of foreign matter into BSA solution, the top of column is covered by clear wrap. Bubble should not be incorporated into BSA solution. Do not touch the sedimentation column to maintain BSA density gradient.
Key resources table
Materials and equipment
Dissolved collagenase A (50 mg/mL) and DNase I (20 mg/mL) into HBSS (1×) are stored at 4°C before experiments and −80°C after experiments. Stock solution of collagenase A and DNase I should be aliquoted to minimize freeze/thaw cycles. All solution/medium should be made right before experiments. DMEM: F12 with/without phenol red is available for digestion media.Digestion media I5% Percoll solutionDigestion media IISecond digestion can be performed without DNase I. After digestion with Trypsin, add DNase I to the digested cells and shake the cells by hand for 30 s.
Step-by-step method details
Sacrifice mice
Timing: ~30 minThe steps include preparation of testes from mice.Sacrifice mice using isoflurane inhalation in the closed chamber and open the lower abdomen using surgical scissors (Figure 2A).
Figure 2
Preparation of mouse testes
(A) View of mouse with opening at the lower abdomen on the dissection tray. Arrows indicate epididymal fat.
(B) Pulling epididymal fat can expose testes and epididymis. Arrow indicates testis.
(C) Removal of epididymal fat and epididymis around testes.
(D) Removal of tunica albuginea. Arrow indicates tunica albuginea of testis.
Preparation of mouse testes(A) View of mouse with opening at the lower abdomen on the dissection tray. Arrows indicate epididymal fat.(B) Pulling epididymal fat can expose testes and epididymis. Arrow indicates testis.(C) Removal of epididymal fat and epididymis around testes.(D) Removal of tunica albuginea. Arrow indicates tunica albuginea of testis.Expose testes by pulling epididymal fat and remove fat and epididymis around testes (Figures 2B and 2C).Transfer testes to cold DPBS, and wash blood. Then, remove the tunica albuginea of testes (Figure 2D).Transfer the tunica albuginea-removed testes to digestion media I (10 mL).
Preparation of single-cell suspension of testes (testicular cells)
Timing: ~100 minThe steps exhibit dissociation of testes using enzymes to get single-cell suspension of testes (testicular cells).Primary digestion is performed at 37°C (Figure 3A).
Figure 3
Digestion of mouse testes
(A) The left image shows decapitulated testes in digestion media I. In 15 min, seminiferous tubules of testes are dissociated (right).
(B) Digested product poured over 5% Percoll solution is separated by gravity (left). In 20 min, high density seminiferous tubules sink to the bottom (right).
(C) Secondary digestion results in single-cell suspension from seminiferous tubules.
Following incubation for 5 min, dissociate testes thorough pipetting.Incubate for 15 min further. Then, gently pipette until seminiferous tubules are dissociated.Digestion of mouse testes(A) The left image shows decapitulated testes in digestion media I. In 15 min, seminiferous tubules of testes are dissociated (right).(B) Digested product poured over 5% Percoll solution is separated by gravity (left). In 20 min, high density seminiferous tubules sink to the bottom (right).(C) Secondary digestion results in single-cell suspension from seminiferous tubules.CRITICAL: Seminiferous tubules should be maintained intact. Too much pipetting can result in fragmentation of tubules.Load the digested product over the top of 5% Percoll solution (40 mL) at 20°C–25°C. In 20 min, while the majority of interstitial cells are distributed at the top of the solution, highly dense seminiferous tubules sink at the bottom (Figure 3B).Remove 35 mL of supernatant and transfer 5 mL of bottom including seminiferous tubules to digestion media II (10 mL).Secondary digestion is performed for 20 min at 37°C. Carefully pipette until seminiferous tubules disappear (Figure 3C).Add FBS 3 mL to neutralize trypsin.CRITICAL: Digestion for a long time can cause cell aggregation (see Troubleshooting 1).The digested product is filtered through a 70 μm cell strainer and 40 μm cell strainer sequentially.Centrifuge filtered cell suspension with 500 × g at 4°C for 10 min.Pipette cell pellet with HBSS (1×) 1 mL and centrifuge it with 500 × g at 4°C for 2 min. Pipette cell pellet with RBC lysis buffer (1×, dilution with distilled water) 1 mL and incubate at 4°C for 1 min. Then, centrifuge it with 500 × g at 4°C for 2 min.CRITICAL: Keep the time for this step. Too long time for RBC lysis can damage testicular cells.Pipette cells with HBSS (1×) 1 mL and then centrifuge with 500 × g at 4°C for 2 min.Pipette cells with 1 mL of 0.5% BSA.
Unit gravity sedimentation in BSA density gradient
Timing: ~4 hThrough these steps, 20 fractions of testicular cells are collected.Load testicular cells in 1 mL of 0.5% BSA to the wall of column slowly over 0.5% BSA using serological pipettes (Figure 1D).Stand for 150 min at 20°C–25°C.Open the valve at the bottom of column so that the flow rate is 2 mL/min.Collect fractions per 4 mL.Centrifuge all fractions with 1,000 × g at 4°C for 10 min.Discard supernatant and pipette cell pellets with HBSS (1×) 1 mL.Observe cells in each fraction with a microscope.Following centrifugation with 1,000 × g at 4°C for 3 min, store cell pellet at −80°C.
Expected outcomes
Following sedimentation, we analyzed cell number, viability, and composition in each fraction, and performed qRT-PCR to measure the expression of marker genes at spermatogenic stages.
Cell number, viability, and composition
We collected 3 × 107 cells from the testes of 2 mice. Following BSA density sedimentation, early fractions (from 2 to 7) showed relatively low cell number and viability compared to later fractions (Figure 4A). Late fractions (from 16 to 20) exhibited relatively high cell number and viability. However, fractions 18–20 contain many dead cells. In fractions 19 and 20, residual bodies, released from spermatids through spermiogenesis, were observed and seemed to contribute to low cell viability.
Figure 4
Analysis of cells from each fraction
(A) The cell number and viability of fractions.
(B) Representative confocal images of cells from fractions with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm.
(C) The percentage of cell types from fractions 14–20.
Analysis of cells from each fraction(A) The cell number and viability of fractions.(B) Representative confocal images of cells from fractions with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm.(C) The percentage of cell types from fractions 14–20.When we counted the percentage of spermatids in fractions (Zhang et al., 2017), round spermatids were the most enriched in fraction 16 and elongating/condensing spermatids (ES/CS) were dominantly enriched in fractions 18 and 19 (Figures 4B and 4C). Fractions earlier than fraction 16 contained other cell types including spermatocytes (SC) and spermatogonia (SG) more.
Expression of marker genes at spermatogenic stages
We used primers to probe Amh, Sox9, Cyp11a1, Zbtb16, Sycp2, Spaca1, Acrv1, Tnp2, and Prm2 for qRT-PCR. The expression of Amh and Sox9, marker genes of Sertoli cells, and Cyp11a1, a marker gene of Leydig cells, were high in fractions 1–6 and decreased after fractions 7 and 8, indicating that Sertoli cells and Leydig cells were enriched in fractions 1–6 (Figure 5A). Although Leydig cells were removed at steps 6 and 7, some still remained. The expression of Zbtb16, a marker of spermatogonia, was high in fractions 13–15, indicating that spermatogonia were enriched in these fractions. Sycp2, a marker of spermatocytes, showed high mRNA levels in fractions 7–12. Spaca1 and Acrv1, marker genes of round spermatids, were expressed similarly throughout all fractions beside fractions 17–20 (Figure 5B). Tnp2 and Prm2, marker genes of elongating and condensing spermatids, were detected in high levels in fractions 18 and 19, representing that elongating and condensing spermatids were enriched in fractions 18 and 19 (Figure 5C). However, as the expression of Amh and Sox9 increased in fractions 19 and 20, we excluded these fractions from the collection of elongating and condensing spermatids. Together, we selected fraction 16 for round spermatids and fraction 18 for elongating and condensing spermatids.
Figure 5
The expression of marker genes at the spermatogenic stage from fractions
(A) The relative mRNA levels of marker genes of Sertoli cells (Amh and Sox9) and Leydig cells (Cyp11a1) from fractions 1–20.
(B) The relative mRNA levels of marker genes of spermatogonia (Zbtb16), spermatocytes (Sycp2), and early spermatids (Spaca1 and Acrv1) from fractions 1–20.
(C) The relative mRNA levels of marker genes of late spermatids (Tnp2 and Prm2) from fractions 1–20.
The expression of marker genes at the spermatogenic stage from fractions(A) The relative mRNA levels of marker genes of Sertoli cells (Amh and Sox9) and Leydig cells (Cyp11a1) from fractions 1–20.(B) The relative mRNA levels of marker genes of spermatogonia (Zbtb16), spermatocytes (Sycp2), and early spermatids (Spaca1 and Acrv1) from fractions 1–20.(C) The relative mRNA levels of marker genes of late spermatids (Tnp2 and Prm2) from fractions 1–20.
Limitations
This protocol has issues on the purity of the cell population. Each fraction contains a mixture of several cell populations. However, we could select spermatid fractions based on microscopic images and marker gene expression: fraction 16 for round / elongating spermatids (RS/ES) and fraction 18 for elongating/condensing spermatids (ES/CS). Dividing fraction more to increase the volume of the sedimentation column may improve the purity of the cell population. As we used a 100 mL column for sedimentation column with testicular cells from 2 mice, a bigger column can be also used to separate more testicular cells (see Troubleshooting 2).Fractions 17–20 containing elongating and condensing spermatids show low cell viability. To increase viability, we recommend using a kit to remove dead cells (see Troubleshooting 3). Moreover, since fractions 19 and 20 exhibit increased expression of Amh and Sox9, marker genes of Sertoli cells, we do not recommend using fractions 19 and 20.
Troubleshooting
Problem 1
Inefficient dissociation of testes or the aggregation of cells (steps 4–9).
Potential solution
DNase I is critical to digest testes. Low concentration or poor quality of DNase I does not work for the digestion of testes. And, extended exposure of trypsin can cause the aggregation of cells. Keep the time for digestion step.
Problem 2
Failure of separation of spermatogenic cells (Before you begin, steps 14 and 15).BSA density gradient is important for the separation of spermatogenic cells. When building the BSA density gradient in the sedimentation column, fast loading of BSA media can lead to failure in building the BSA density gradient. We recommend less than 2 mL/min as loading velocity of BSA media. Physical stress can disturb the BSA density gradient, leading to inefficient separation of spermatogenic cells. And, loading too many testicular cells can decrease the efficiency of separation. To separate more testicular cells, the bigger volume of the sedimentation column/chamber is required.
Problem 3
Low viability of spermatids (step 21).Above stated, cell viability of fractions 17–20 that include elongating and condensing spermatids is low due to dead cells and residual body. To increase cell viability, we tested a kit to remove dead cells from fraction 18 containing mainly elongating/condensing spermatids. Using the kit which remove dead cells through magnetic beads and magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) improved the viability of cells from fraction 18 (Figure 6A). Moreover, sedimentation in the cold room at 4°C showed higher viability in late fractions than sedimentation at 25°C (Figure 6B). Experiment at low temperature may be helpful to collect better quality of spermatids.
Figure 6
Improvement of the spermatids viability in late fractions
(A) The improvement of the spermatids viability by dead cell removal.
(B) The difference of the cell viability following unit gravity sedimentation performed at 25°C and 4°C.
Improvement of the spermatids viability in late fractions(A) The improvement of the spermatids viability by dead cell removal.(B) The difference of the cell viability following unit gravity sedimentation performed at 25°C and 4°C.
Resource availability
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Sung Hee Baek (sbaek@snu.ac.kr).
Materials availability
This study did not generate new unique reagents.
Data and code availability
This study did not generate any unique datasets or code.
REAGENT or RESOURCE
SOURCE
IDENTIFIER
Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins
DMEM: F12 (with phenol red)
Welgene
LM002-04
DMEM: F12 (without phenol red)
Welgene
LM002-05
Collagenase A
Sigma-Aldrich
10103578001
DNase I, grade II, from bovine pancreas
Sigma-Aldrich
10104159001
Trypsin (1×, 0.25%)
Welgene
LS015-03
Percoll
Sigma-Aldrich
P1644
FBS
HyClone
SH30084.03
HBSS (10×) (with calcium/magnesium)
Welgene
LB203-04
HBSS (1×) (with calcium/magnesium)
Welgene
LB003-02
DPBS (1×)
Welgene
LB001-02
RBC lysis buffer (10×)
Invitrogen
00-4300-54
Bovine serum albumin
Bovogen
BSA100
TOPreal qPCR 2× PreMIX
Enzynomics
RT500
Ifran solution (isoflurane 100 mL)
Hana Pharm
657801261
Critical commercial assays
Dead Cell Removal Kit (https://www.miltenyibiotec.com/US-en/products/dead-cell-removal-kit.html)
Authors: Jessica M Bryant; Mirella L Meyer-Ficca; Vanessa M Dang; Shelley L Berger; Ralph G Meyer Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Yao-Fu Chang; Jennifer S Lee-Chang; Subbarayalu Panneerdoss; James A MacLean; Manjeet K Rao Journal: Biotechniques Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 1.993
Authors: Ana C Lima; Min Jung; Jannette Rusch; Abul Usmani; Alexandra M Lopes; Donald F Conrad Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 1.355