Literature DB >> 33490952

A Preliminary Analysis of the Importance of Distance, Angle, and Insight When Soccer Referees Make Penalty Decisions.

Bjørn Tore Johansen1, Martin Kjeøen Erikstad1.   

Abstract

Soccer referees move freely on the pitch to place themselves in the best location for making decisions. While Football Association UK (FA) highlights that a referee should never be more than 20 m away from the playing situation, previous studies have been inconsistent in indicating appropriate distance to a situation for increasing the likelihood of a correct decision. Further, appropriate angle and insight are also likely to influence the correctness of referees' decisions. The aim of this study was to provide an initial investigation of elite referees' positioning in the field (distance, angle, and insight) when making correct and erroneous decisions in potential penalty situations. An expert panel (EP) consisting of two active referees with relevant academic background analyzed referees positioning when making correct or erroneous decisions regarding penalties. The EP were asked to qualitatively analyze referees positioning in selected video clips by using recommended technical refereeing criteria and practical guidelines (i.e., the referee's distance from, angle to, and insight into the penalty situations). Of the 42 situations evaluated, the results revealed that the EP termed the referees positioning as good in terms of angle and insight in 25 and 21 situations, respectively. The angle was average in seven situations and poor in 10 situations, and the insight were average in 10 situations and poor in 11 situations. The match referee was <10 meters away in 12 situations, 10-20 m away in 22 situations, and >20 meters away in eight situations. Results revealed that referees' positioning that resulted in the highest rate of correct decisions were when the distance were under 10 meters (83% correct decisions), good angle (88%), and good insight (86%). In contrast, referees were poorly positioned in terms of angle and/or insight in nine of the 15 erroneous decisions made. Although the present study was a preliminary qualitative investigation containing a limited number of potential penalty situations, the findings indicated that soccer referees are more likely to produce a correct decision in potential penalty situations when the distance to the situation is under 10 meters, when the insight to the situation is good and the angle to the incident is good. In contrast, the match referees generally had a poor starting position to assess the penalty situations where they landed on a wrong decision. While previous studies have been somewhat inconsistent in indicating optimal referee positioning in soccer, the present study highlights the potential value of a more qualitative approach to understand referees' positioning and subsequent decision-making accuracy.
Copyright © 2021 Johansen and Erikstad.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angle; decision-making skills; distance; insight; penalty situations

Year:  2021        PMID: 33490952      PMCID: PMC7820113          DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2020.595703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Sports Act Living        ISSN: 2624-9367


  12 in total

1.  Physical and perceptual-cognitive demands of top-class refereeing in association football.

Authors:  Werner Helsen; Jean-Baptist Bultynck
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 2.  The paranoid optimist: an integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases.

Authors:  Martie G Haselton; Daniel Nettle
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2006

3.  The role of viewing distance and viewing angle on referees' decision-making performance during the FIFA World Cup 2014.

Authors:  Ernst-Joachim Hossner; Urs Schnyder; Jürg Schmid; Ralf Kredel
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.337

4.  Activity Profiles of Top-Class Players and Referees and Accuracy in Foul Decision-Making During Korean National League Soccer Games.

Authors:  Chang Hwa Joo; Haemi Jee
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  To be or not to be an excellent football referee: different experts' viewpoints.

Authors:  João Aragão E Pina; Ana Margarida Passos; Helena Carvalho; M Travis Maynard
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.337

6.  Effect of positioning on the accuracy of decision making of association football top-class referees and assistant referees during competitive matches.

Authors:  Javier Mallo; Pablo Gonzalez Frutos; Daniel Juárez; Enrique Navarro
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 3.337

7.  Evaluating erroneous offside calls in soccer.

Authors:  Stefanie Hüttermann; Benjamin Noël; Daniel Memmert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Running Performance and Position is Not Related to Decision-Making Accuracy in Referees.

Authors:  Amund Riiser; Vidar Andersen; Atle Sæterbakken; Einar Ylvisaker; Vegard Fusche Moe
Journal:  Sports Med Int Open       Date:  2019-08-16

9.  Referee Bias in Professional Football: Favoritism Toward Successful Teams in Potential Penalty Situations.

Authors:  Martin Kjeøen Erikstad; Bjørn Tore Johansen
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-02-27

10.  Call Accuracy and Distance from the Play: A Study with Brazilian Soccer Referees.

Authors:  Mario Cesar DE Oliveira; Rogerio Orbetelli; Turibio Leite DE Barros Neto
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2011-01-15
View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of Match Type and Match Halves on Referees' Physical Performance and Decision-Making Distance in Chinese Football Super League.

Authors:  Jinying Jiang; Huanmin Ge; Lida Du; Miguel-Angel Gomez; Bingnan Gong; Yixiong Cui
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-09

2.  Match Analysis of Soccer Refereeing Using Spatiotemporal Data: A Case Study.

Authors:  Bruno Gonçalves; Diogo Coutinho; Bruno Travassos; João Brito; Pedro Figueiredo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.