Ruisheng Wang1, David Erickson2. 1. Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States. 2. Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance is increasingly recognized as a major threat to global health. To combat this emerging threat, accessible antimicrobial susceptibility testing should be prioritized as a key component of stewardship efforts. In this work, we developed a user-friendly paper-based test that provides visual readout of bacterial antibiotic susceptibility in a semiquantitative format. We leveraged on-chip paper microfluidics to enable multiplexed testing of multiple antibiotic dilutions with a single sample addition step, replicating the functionality of traditional broth-dilution-based susceptibility testing in a simplified format. Our paper-based test offers several advantages including low sample volume requirement and lack of need for humidity control during incubation, an innovation that addresses a key limitation of conventional paper-microfluidic devices. Using several clinically relevant bacterial organisms and antimicrobial agents, we demonstrate that our colorimetric readout approach provides a strong predictor of susceptibility category.
Antimicrobial resistance is increasingly recognized as a major threat to global health. To combat this emerging threat, accessible antimicrobial susceptibility testing should be prioritized as a key component of stewardship efforts. In this work, we developed a user-friendly paper-based test that provides visual readout of bacterial antibiotic susceptibility in a semiquantitative format. We leveraged on-chip paper microfluidics to enable multiplexed testing of multiple antibiotic dilutions with a single sample addition step, replicating the functionality of traditional broth-dilution-based susceptibility testing in a simplified format. Our paper-based test offers several advantages including low sample volume requirement and lack of need for humidity control during incubation, an innovation that addresses a key limitation of conventional paper-microfluidic devices. Using several clinically relevant bacterial organisms and antimicrobial agents, we demonstrate that our colorimetric readout approach provides a strong predictor of susceptibility category.
Antimicrobial resistance
(AMR) is increasingly recognized as a
substantial threat to global health.[1] Overuse
and misuse of antimicrobials are contributing toward an increasing
prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant and multidrug-resistant organisms.
In the case of antibiotics, studies have shown that almost one in
three prescriptions are inappropriate, either in choice of agent or
duration.[2,3] Incorrect antimicrobial usage can facilitate
the development of AMR genes through selective pressures.[4] In order to combat misuse, evidence-based antimicrobial
agent selection based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST)
forms a key component of antimicrobial stewardship efforts.[5] Accessible susceptibility testing methods are
crucial for facilitating stewardship, especially in point-of-care
and limited resource settings. Clinically, the need for accessible
testing methods remains unmet as many US hospitals outsource susceptibility
testing to reference laboratories.[6] The
preference for user-friendly testing methods is reflected in the fact
that when testing is done in-house, hospital labs predominately favor
the use of gradient diffusion,[6] which is
relatively simple but can require subjective interpretation of results.[7] Reference laboratories on the other hand predominately
favor use of broth microdilution,[6] which
provides quantitative minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) information
but requires high operator input and availability of diagnostic instrumentation.There have been ongoing research efforts to develop novel phenotypic
AST methods.[8] Phenotypic AST, which involves
direct measuring of organism growth in the presence of an antibiotic,
is differentiated from genotypic AST, which involves detecting resistance
genes to infer susceptibility profiles.[9] Developments in the area of microfluidic AST methods have attempted
to improve upon conventional AST methods through automation and lower
sample volume requirements.[10] Examples
of novel microfluidic AST approaches include a self-loading chip device,[11] a pH-sensitive hydrogel sensor,[12] agarose channels that enable morphology tracking,[13] on-chip broth dilution,[14] and nanoliter arrays.[15] Despite these
advances, microfluidic approaches often face limitations of manufacturing
and readout complexity,[10] which have served
as barriers to scalability and widespread adoption.Paper microfluidics
have the potential to address some of the scalability
limitations of microfluidic AST. In paper microfluidics, 2D/3D channels
are formed in a paper substrate through wax patterning to enable passive
fluid transport.[16] Compared to the polymers
commonly used to fabricate microfluidic devices, paper substrates
offer greater manufacturing flexibility through compatibility with
a number of patterning techniques, act as a natural medium for colorimetric
tests, and can be easily disposed of via incineration.[16,17] Examples of paper-microfluidic AST approaches include a paper-polydimethylsiloxane
(PDMS) hybrid disk diffusion culture device,[18] a paper-PDMS cell culture array,[19] and
a paper-based β-lactamase test.[20] With paper-microfluidic devices, sample evaporation is often an
issue that necessitates the use of external humidity control to resolve,
which can limit the practicality of device deployment in point-of-care
or limited resource settings.In this work, we present a novel
paper-microfluidic AST method
that replicates the functionality of broth microdilution in a simplified
format. Our method consists of a sealable paper-based test chip that
provides a visual susceptibility readout. Printed wax channels allowed
for antibiotics and growth-sensitive dye to be predried in spatially
separate zones on the test chip, thereby enabling multiplexed testing
of multiple antibiotic concentrations with a single sample addition
step. Our chip was designed to eliminate the need for external humidity
control during incubation, an improvement over a key limitation of
conventional paper-microfluidic devices. We demonstrate the efficacy
of our paper-based method through comparing on-chip and off-chip AST
results for several clinically relevant bacterial organisms.
Results
and Discussion
Paper-Based AST Design
As shown
in Figure , we developed
a sealable paper-based
test chip that provides a visual readout of AST results. Hydrophobic
wax channels were leveraged to create a network of test zones to enable
susceptibility testing at multiple antibiotic concentrations with
a single sample addition step. Serial-diluted antibiotics along with
the colorimetric redox indicator resazurin were predried in the test
zones, further simplifying testing workflow and replicating the functionality
of broth-dilution-based AST. A single sample addition step reconstitutes
dried reagents and allows bacteria to be incubated in the presence
of a specific antibiotic concentration in each test zone. The redox
indicator resazurin is reduced into resorufin by metabolically active
bacteria,[21] thereby providing a visual
indication of bacterial growth when the test zone antibiotic concentration
is insufficient to inhibit growth (i.e., below MIC). When considered
collectively, the number of “positive” test zones exhibiting
color change is correlated with the bacterial strain’s MIC
value and susceptibility category.
Figure 1
Overview of chip fabrication and AST process.
(A) Wax patterns
printed on chromatography paper is heated on a hot plate to form hydrophobic
barriers through the thickness of the paper. (B) Each chip accommodates
eight test zones that hold seven antibiotic concentrations along with
a no-antibiotic control. Antibiotics and a resazurin-based dye, which
provides visual indication of bacterial growth, are predried in the
test zones prior to AST. Test zones increase in antibiotic concentration
counterclockwise with the control zone at the three o’clock
position (denoted by C). Prior to reagent dispensing, the back of
the chip is sealed using sterile sealing film to prevent leakage.
The GEN label denotes the chip containing the antibiotic gentamicin.
(C) To initiate AST, the bacterial sample is dispensed in the center
of the chip and water is dispensed in the peripheral region. The chip
is then sealed using a sterile film to prevent contamination and trap
evaporating water vapors, which helps maintain humidity during incubation.
Increased fluid volume from the added water lowers sample evaporation
during incubation. (D) Bacteria uninhibited by antibiotics reduce
resazurin into resorufin, which induces a color change in the test
zone. The number of zones with reduced resazurin is correlated with
the magnitude of the bacterial strain’s MIC value. (E) Test
chip with melted wax channels. (F) Sealed test chip ready for incubation.
Overview of chip fabrication and AST process.
(A) Wax patterns
printed on chromatography paper is heated on a hot plate to form hydrophobic
barriers through the thickness of the paper. (B) Each chip accommodates
eight test zones that hold seven antibiotic concentrations along with
a no-antibiotic control. Antibiotics and a resazurin-based dye, which
provides visual indication of bacterial growth, are predried in the
test zones prior to AST. Test zones increase in antibiotic concentration
counterclockwise with the control zone at the three o’clock
position (denoted by C). Prior to reagent dispensing, the back of
the chip is sealed using sterile sealing film to prevent leakage.
The GEN label denotes the chip containing the antibiotic gentamicin.
(C) To initiate AST, the bacterial sample is dispensed in the center
of the chip and water is dispensed in the peripheral region. The chip
is then sealed using a sterile film to prevent contamination and trap
evaporating water vapors, which helps maintain humidity during incubation.
Increased fluid volume from the added water lowers sample evaporation
during incubation. (D) Bacteria uninhibited by antibiotics reduce
resazurin into resorufin, which induces a color change in the test
zone. The number of zones with reduced resazurin is correlated with
the magnitude of the bacterial strain’s MIC value. (E) Test
chip with melted wax channels. (F) Sealed test chip ready for incubation.To initiate on-chip AST, 80 μL of the sample
is dispensed
in the central region of the chip. The sample is then divided by the
wax channels and flows into each of eight test zones via capillary
action. We estimate that each test zone can accommodate 4–5
μL of sample volume. Because of these small sample volumes,
we incorporated a peripheral water-holding region, which accommodates
120 μL of water, on the chip to minimize sample evaporation
during incubation. Because the chip is sealed inside the nonpermeable
film during incubation, evaporating water vapors raise the ambient
humidity of the internal air pocket and the increased fluid volume
from the water-hold region helps mitigate sample evaporation. As a
result, this element of the chip design eliminates the need for external
humidity control during incubation.
Colorimetric Detection
of Susceptibility
Following
incubation, AST results can be interpreted qualitatively by eye or
quantitively through colorimetric image analysis. Quantitative colorimetric
analysis of on-chip results is shown in Figure . The chip was imaged using a smartphone
and analyzed in the hue, saturation, value (HSV) color-space, which
we have found to be more precise for colorimetric analysis and less
sensitive to lighting conditions compared to the red, blue, green
(RGB) color-space.[23] For each test zone,
the average hue value in a 160-pixel diameter circular region was
calculated and a threshold (275 hue) was used to differentiate between
positive (uninhibited growth) and negative (inhibited growth) zones.
A lower number of positive test zones correlates to a lower MIC value
and a higher number of positive test zones to a higher MIC. As shown
in Figure B,D, a significant
difference in the hue profile can be used to distinguish between ampicillin
(AMP)-resistant (six positive zones) and AMP-susceptible (no-antibiotic
control positive only) Escherichia coli strains.
Figure 2
Colorimetric detection of bacterial growth. (A) Post-incubation
test chip of E. coli BAA-2452 (AMP
resistant via off-chip AST) grown in the presence of varying concentrations
of AMP. Test zones with uninhibited and viable bacteria exhibit colorimetric
change from blue to pink as resazurin is reduced into resorufin. The
chip was imaged using a smartphone and analyzed in the HSV color-space.
(B) For each test zone, the average hue value in a 160-pixel diameter
circular region was calculated and a threshold (275 hue) was used
to differentiate between zones with reduced (indicates growth) and
unreduced (indicates no growth) resazurin. Zones above the threshold
(pink) are classified as positive and zones below (blue) as negative.
(C) Post-incubation test chip of E. coli ATCC-25922 (AMP susceptible via off-chip AST) grown in the presence
of AMP. (D) Test zone hue values of E. coli ATCC-25922.
Colorimetric detection of bacterial growth. (A) Post-incubation
test chip of E. coli BAA-2452 (AMP
resistant via off-chip AST) grown in the presence of varying concentrations
of AMP. Test zones with uninhibited and viable bacteria exhibit colorimetric
change from blue to pink as resazurin is reduced into resorufin. The
chip was imaged using a smartphone and analyzed in the HSV color-space.
(B) For each test zone, the average hue value in a 160-pixel diameter
circular region was calculated and a threshold (275 hue) was used
to differentiate between zones with reduced (indicates growth) and
unreduced (indicates no growth) resazurin. Zones above the threshold
(pink) are classified as positive and zones below (blue) as negative.
(C) Post-incubation test chip of E. coli ATCC-25922 (AMP susceptible via off-chip AST) grown in the presence
of AMP. (D) Test zone hue values of E. coli ATCC-25922.
On-Chip AST
To
demonstrate expanded on-chip AST capabilities,
we tested strains of E. coli ATCC-25922, E. coli BAA-2452, Klebsiella pneumoniae BAA-1903, and Acinetobacter baumannii BAA-1791 against four common antibiotics: gentamicin, ampicillin,
ciprofloxacin, and meropenem (dilution concentrations for each antibiotic
can be found in the Supporting Information). Strains were tested at a recommended starting concentration of
5 × 105 CFU/mL[22] and analyzed
following overnight incubation. Each bacteria–antibiotic combination
was tested in triplicate and the number of positive on-chip test zones,
which showed consistency across triplicates for each combination,
was correlated to off-chip AST determination (VITEK 2 automated AST).
Comparisons of on-chip and off-chip AST results are shown in Figure . We observed that
there is a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) in the number of positive test zones for susceptible
and resistant categories.
Figure 3
Comparison of on-chip and off-chip AST results.
(A) For each antibiotic,
on-chip AST results in the form of number of test zones with reduced
resazurin (indicates growth) are plotted along with off-chip AST-determined
susceptibility category. Square markers represent gentamicin (GEN),
triangle markers represent ciprofloxacin (CIP), circle markers represent
AMP, and diamond markers represent meropenem (MEM). R (pink) and S
(blue) denote resistant and susceptible, respectively, as determined
via off-chip AST. A statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) is observed in the number of positive test
zones between susceptible and resistant organisms. Each bacteria–antibiotic
combination was tested in triplicate, and the number of positive on-chip
test zones showed consistency across triplicates for each combination.
(B) Table summarizing AST results. On-chip results: number indicates
number of test zones with reduced resazurin (including no-antibiotic
control zone). Off-chip results: S and R denote vendor MIC interpretations,
corresponding to susceptible and resistant, respectively.
Comparison of on-chip and off-chip AST results.
(A) For each antibiotic,
on-chip AST results in the form of number of test zones with reduced
resazurin (indicates growth) are plotted along with off-chip AST-determined
susceptibility category. Square markers represent gentamicin (GEN),
triangle markers represent ciprofloxacin (CIP), circle markers represent
AMP, and diamond markers represent meropenem (MEM). R (pink) and S
(blue) denote resistant and susceptible, respectively, as determined
via off-chip AST. A statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) is observed in the number of positive test
zones between susceptible and resistant organisms. Each bacteria–antibiotic
combination was tested in triplicate, and the number of positive on-chip
test zones showed consistency across triplicates for each combination.
(B) Table summarizing AST results. On-chip results: number indicates
number of test zones with reduced resazurin (including no-antibiotic
control zone). Off-chip results: S and R denote vendor MIC interpretations,
corresponding to susceptible and resistant, respectively.
Discussion
To combat the increasing prevalence of AMR,
accessible AST should
be prioritized as a key component of stewardship efforts. In this
work, we developed a user-friendly paper-based test chip that provides
visual readout of AST results in a semiquantitative format. We demonstrated
on-chip that the number of positive test zones is a strong predictor
of the susceptibility category. Incorporation of paper microfluidics
enabled multiplexed testing of antibiotic dilutions with a single
sample addition step, mimicking and simplifying the testing concept
of traditional broth-dilution-based AST. We demonstrated the testing
capability of our method using several clinically relevant bacterial
organisms and antimicrobial agents.Our paper-based AST method
offers several advantages over conventional
AST methods. First, predrying of reagents along with incorporating
wax microfluidic channels on-chip greatly simplifies testing workflow
and minimizes the number of operator steps needed to test multiple
antibiotic concentrations. Second, the low sample volume requirement
(averages to ∼10 μL per test zone) minimizes reagent
consumption and is almost an order of magnitude lower than the per-well
sample volume typically required in 96-well microdilution.[22] Third, spatially separate test zones facilitate
semiquantitative interpretation of AST results, especially when aided
by the resazurin-based colorimetric indicator. Imaging-based readout
of results eliminates subjective interpretation and associated inaccuracies
that can be present with visual-based readout of microdilution and
gradient diffusion results.[24,25] Compared to PDMS-based
microfluidic devices, our paper-based test chip is of lower fabrication
complexity. In addition, because sealing of the chip from the external
environment removes the need for humidity control, our chip is amenable
to flexible incubating conditions with temperature control as the
only requirement—meaning incubation can occur in a benchtop
incubator, oven, or even on a hotplate. Eliminating the need for external
humidity control during incubation marks an improvement over a key
limitation of conventional paper-microfluidic devices.We noticed
that when drying antibiotics on paper, it was necessary
to use higher concentrations of antibiotics than that typically used
in liquid culture. This is a potential limitation as the MICs obtained
on-chip cannot be directly compared with published MIC breakpoints
without an intermediate calibration curve. We hypothesize that higher
antibiotic concentrations are required because of (1) irreversible
binding of dried antibiotics to paper and/or (2) diffusion of antibiotics
out of the test zones into the feeder microfluidic channels which
ultimately reduces the test zones’ final concentrations. This
potential limitation can be mitigated as additional organisms with
different susceptibility profiles are tested on-chip, and calibration
curves are established linking on-chip and off-chip MIC values, which
will enable fully quantitative AST in paper-based format. Additionally,
modification of the paper substrate with blocking agents and/or surfactants
may facilitate resolubilization of dried antibiotics.In summary,
we developed a user-friendly paper-based AST method
that leverages paper microfluidics to simplifying testing and provide
visual readout of AST results. Our method offers several advantages
over conventional AST methods and has the potential to serve as an
accessible alternative in point-of-care and limited-resource settings.
Experimental
Section
Bacterial Strains
Quality control and multidrug-resistant
reference strains with characterized AST profiles (via automated AST)
were sourced from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Strains
used in this study consisted of E. coli ATCC 25922, E. coli BAA-2452, K. pneumoniae BAA-1903, and A. baumannii BAA-1791. Strains were received in the lyophilized format and revived
according to vendor instructions.
Chip Design and Fabrication
2D microfluidic channels
were designed using Adobe Illustrator and printed onto Whatman Grade
1 filter paper (GE Healthcare) using a ColorQube 8570 wax printer
(Xerox). The channels were designed to separate the chip into two
distinct regions: a central sample holding region that branches into
eight test zones and a peripheral water holding region. Text labels
were printed along the periphery of the chip to denote the antibiotic
used and respective concentrations in each of the multiple zones.
Following printing, each chip (5 cm length × 5 cm width) was
cut out using scissors sterilized with 70% ethanol. In order to melt
the wax channels through the thickness of the filter paper to form
a hydrophobic barrier, each chip was heated on a hot plate (VWR) set
to 150 °C for 1 min. After heating, the back side of each chip
was sealed using the sterile microplate sealing film (VWR) to prevent
leakage. Alternatively, the transparent tape can also be used.To functionalize the chips for AST, antibiotics and the growth-sensitive
dye resazurin were predried on the chip to enable testing with a single
sample addition step. Antibiotics used consisted of AMP, MEM, gentamicin,
and CIP (all sourced from MilliporeSigma). The growth-sensitive dye
resazurin (PrestoBlue, Thermo Fisher) is a redox indicator that is
reduced by metabolically active cells into resorufin, leading to significant
colorimetric and fluorescent changes which provide a visual indication
of bacterial growth.[21] With 10× PrestoBlue
solution as the diluent, antibiotic stock solutions prepared at 10–50
mg/mL (depending on solubility in water) were initially diluted to
2.5–10 mg/mL and subsequently two-fold serially diluted (exact
concentrations for each dilution of each antibiotic can be found in
the Supporting Information). We noticed
that when drying antibiotics on paper, it was necessary to use higher
concentrations of antibiotics than that typically used in liquid culture.
4 μL of each antibiotic–dye mixture was dispensed in
the test zones in increasing concentration counterclockwise. A control
zone without antibiotic was dispensed at the three o’clock
position. Chips were dried at 37 °C for 1 h and stored protected
from light prior to use.To prepare strains for
on-chip AST, strains
were first streaked on Mueller–Hinton II agar plates (Becton,
Dickinson and Company) and incubated overnight at 37 °C in ambient
air. Liquid cultures were then prepared by inoculating single colonies
into cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton Broth (CAMHB), followed
by overnight incubation at 37 °C in ambient air. To achieve the
recommended AST starting inoculum concentration of 5 × 105 CFU/mL,[22] the overnight culture
was adjusted using CAMHB to the equivalent turbidity of a 0.5 McFarland
standard, which represents a concentration of approximately 1 ×
108 CFU/mL. Using a spectrophotometer (V-1200, VWR), the
OD625 nm absorbance corresponding to a 0.5 McFarland standard was
verified to be in the range of 0.08–0.13.[22] Cultures were subsequently diluted 1:100 in CAMHB to reach
an approximate starting concentration of 5 × 105 CFU/mL.
80 μL of the diluted sample was then dispensed in the center
of the test chip followed by 120 μL of distilled water in the
peripheral water holding region. After the entire chip was saturated
by the dispensed liquids, the chip was sealed using two pieces of
the sterile microplate sealing film (VWR). Sealing of the test chip
prevents contamination and helps to maintain humidity by trapping
evaporating water vapors. The water-holding region increases the total
volume of liquid stored on-chip, which helps to limit sample evaporation
during incubation. Chips were incubated overnight (14–16 h)
at 37 °C (ambient air) in a benchtop incubator protected from
light.
Data Analysis
To quantitatively analyze color change
in the test zones following incubation, test chips were imaged using
a smartphone and analyzed in MATLAB (MathWorks). Images were analyzed
in the HSV color-space which we determined to be less sensitive to
lighting conditions compared to the RGB color-space. For each test
zone, the average hue value in a 160-pixel diameter circular region
was calculated and a threshold was used to differentiate between zones
with reduced (growth) and unreduced (no growth) resazurin. The number
of zones with reduced resazurin is correlated with the magnitude of
the bacterial strain’s MIC value.
Statistical Analysis
The F-test was used to test for
equality of population variances, and unpaired one-tailed t-test was used to test for equality of population means.
Authors: G L Woods; J S Bergmann; F G Witebsky; G A Fahle; B Boulet; M Plaunt; B A Brown; R J Wallace; A Wanger Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Katherine E Boehle; Jake Gilliand; Christopher R Wheeldon; Amethyst Holder; Jaclyn A Adkins; Brian J Geiss; Elizabeth P Ryan; Charles S Henry Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2017-05-05 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Alison H Holmes; Luke S P Moore; Arnfinn Sundsfjord; Martin Steinbakk; Sadie Regmi; Abhilasha Karkey; Philippe J Guerin; Laura J V Piddock Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 79.321