Naga Venkatesh Kollu1, Dennis R LaJeunesse1. 1. Department of Nanoscience, Joint School of Nanoscience and Nanoengineering, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina 27401, United States.
Abstract
Nanostructured surfaces control microbial biofilm formation by killing mechanically via surface architecture. However, the interactions between nanostructured surfaces (NSS) and cellular fungi have not been thoroughly investigated and the application of NSS as a means of controlling fungal biofilms is uncertain. Cellular yeast such as Candida albicans are structurally and biologically distinct from prokaryotic microbes and therefore are predicted to react differently to nanostructured surfaces. The dimorphic opportunistic fungal pathogen, C. albicans, is responsible for most cases of invasive candidiasis and is a serious health concern due to the rapid increase of drug resistance strains. In this paper, we show that the nanostructured surfaces from a cicada wing alter C. albicans' viability, biofilm formation, adhesion, and morphogenesis through physical contact. However, the fungal cell response to the NSS suggests that nanoscale mechanical interactions impact C. albicans differently than prokaryotic microbes. This study informs on the use of nanoscale architecture for the control of eukaryotic biofilm formation and illustrates some potential caveats with the application of NSS as an antimicrobial means.
Nanostructured surfaces control microbial biofilm formation by killing mechanically via surface architecture. However, the interactions between nanostructured surfaces (NSS) and cellular fungi have not been thoroughly investigated and the application of NSS as a means of controlling fungal biofilms is uncertain. Cellular yeast such as Candida albicans are structurally and biologically distinct from prokaryotic microbes and therefore are predicted to react differently to nanostructured surfaces. The dimorphic opportunistic fungal pathogen, C. albicans, is responsible for most cases of invasive candidiasis and is a serious health concern due to the rapid increase of drug resistance strains. In this paper, we show that the nanostructured surfaces from a cicada wing alter C. albicans' viability, biofilm formation, adhesion, and morphogenesis through physical contact. However, the fungal cell response to the NSS suggests that nanoscale mechanical interactions impact C. albicans differently than prokaryotic microbes. This study informs on the use of nanoscale architecture for the control of eukaryotic biofilm formation and illustrates some potential caveats with the application of NSS as an antimicrobial means.
Candida albicans (C. albicans) is a dimorphic opportunistic fungal
pathogen and a commensal member of the human microbiome.[1−6]C. albicans infections in tissue
or on biomedical devices are a serious problem in immunodeficient
patients and implant recipients.[7−10] Candida infections result in invasive candidiasis,
which often leads to fungal sepsis and 100 000 deaths worldwide
per year.[1,11−15] Moreover, mature Candida biofilms are structurally
complex and often serve as a reservoir for more serious bacterial
infections via biofilm encapsulation.[12,16−21] Candida biofilms often host pathogenic microbes like Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and as such are a major source
of secondary bacterial infections.[22−26] Candida biofilm controls are diverse and have involved
a wide range of material interventions including polymeric composites
that contain metal and metal oxide nanomaterials, biopolymer thin
films, and even structural low aspect ratio colloidal monolayers;[27−32] however, little work has been done on nanoscale two-dimensional
(2D) materials like the high aspect ratio nanostructured surfaces
(NSS) derived from insect wings.The structure and composition
of the Candida biofilm depend on
the properties of the contact surface, environmental factors, fungal
cell morphology, and the fungal species.[12,28,33−35] Antimicrobial NSS have
been proposed as a stand-alone treatment or as a potential additive
treatment with existing antimicrobial agents.[36−41] NSS were initially identified as structurally defining components
of insect wings, but more recently these have been fabricated in materials
like polymers or metal oxides.[42−49] NSS inhibit microbial growth and viability via mechanical interrogation
of a microbial cell.[38,50−54] Physical parameters like cell–substrate adhesion
and cell wall rigidity appear to play a role in NSS-induced cell rupture.[55−58] Biophysical models suggest that the bactericidal mechanism is a
result of physical incompatibility between the cell membrane and the
surface.[41,59−65]In this manuscript, we characterized the interaction of the
cellular
fungi C. albicans with NSS found on
the wing of the dog day cicada, Neotibicen tibicen. We define critical timing events associated with specific physiological
and morphological responses of the C. albicans cell to the NSS. C. albicans reacts
to the NSS differently than other microbes exhibiting a slower rupture
rate and evidence of mechanically induced cell wall stress. We also
have identified a novel example of thigmotropism, a mechanosensory
response of a cell or organism to a surface, regarding hyphal morphogenesis
of C. albicans, which may provide a
novel means of controlling C. albicans pathogenesis.
Results and Discussion
Surface Characterization
We examined C. albicans/surface interactions on a NSS derived
from the wings of the dog day cicada (N. tibicen); this NSS contains an ordered array of nanoscale cones (Figure ), 200 nm tall, 200
nm wide with 30 nm tips, and spaced 200 nm apart.[38] We used a flat glass coverslip for the controls. To control
for surface composition effects, all experiments used uncoated surfaces
and surfaces glow-coated with a 7 nm layer of gold. We observed a
slight increase in hydrophobicity with the deposition of 7 nm gold
later to the flat glass and a light reduction in contact of the Au-coated
NSS when compared to the native NSS (Table ). However, all of the surfaces used in the
experiments displayed a similar range of contact angles/surface energy.
Figure 1
SEM micrographs
of surfaces used in these experiments. (A) SEM
of the flat, glass coverslip that was used as a control. (B) Image
of the glass coverslip. (C) SEM micrograph of the NSS from the dog
day cicada wing, N. tibicen. (D) Graphical
representation of the NSS.
Table 1
Contact Angle for Control and NSS
Used in This Study
surface
native/uncoated
gold coated
glass coverslip
79.8 ± 01°
93.1 ± 0.04°
NSS/cicada wing
114.6 ± 0.1°
87.0 ± 0.1°
SEM micrographs
of surfaces used in these experiments. (A) SEM
of the flat, glass coverslip that was used as a control. (B) Image
of the glass coverslip. (C) SEM micrograph of the NSS from the dog
day cicada wing, N. tibicen. (D) Graphical
representation of the NSS.
C. albicans Adhesion to NSS
The formation of a stable adhesion between
a microorganism and a surface is the first step of biofilm formation.[66−70] To determine the role that NSS roughness had on C.
albicans cell–surface adhesion, we cultured
both cellular and hyphal forms of C. albicans on flat and NSS and counted the number of cells bound to the surface.
On control surfaces, the number of C. albicans cells/FOV increased as a function of the time of incubation on flat
surfaces, both Au coated and uncoated (Figures and S1), and
during the first 8 h, the number of cells/FOV on the NSS mirrored
those on control surfaces (Figures and S1). After 16 h the
rate of cell deposition on NSS slowed relative to control surfaces,
but eventually reached the same surface density after 24 h.[71,72]
Figure 2
Surface–cell
adhesion of C. albicans with control
and NSS. (A) Confocal micrographs of CFW labeled over
time. First column shows C. albicans cells cultured on flat control surfaces; the second column shows C. albicans cells cultured on NSS. (B) Average number
of cells per field of view with time for each condition.
Surface–cell
adhesion of C. albicans with control
and NSS. (A) Confocal micrographs of CFW labeled over
time. First column shows C. albicans cells cultured on flat control surfaces; the second column shows C. albicans cells cultured on NSS. (B) Average number
of cells per field of view with time for each condition.
C. albicans Cell Wall Composition Response to NSS Interaction
The polysaccharide
chitin provides mechanical stability to the yeast cell wall, and its
expression level is controlled by mechanical stress via the cell wall
integrity signaling pathway.[73−75] During the first 4 h of contact
with an NSS We observe a significant increase in the fluorescence
of chitin binding dye Calcofluor white (CFW) in C.
albicans cells (Figures and S2). In contrast, C. albicans cells cultured on control surfaces show
no change in levels of CFW fluorescence over the time course (Figures and S2). However, after 4 h, the CFW fluorescent
levels of C. albicanson NSS dropped to the level observed on control surfaces. The transient
chitin increase/stress response suggests that either the yeast cells
recover from NSS mechanical stress or the NSS stops presenting a mechanical
challenge to the C. albicans cell.
NSS activity is complex; some model NSS as a passive mechanical device,
in which microbes impale themselves onto the nanostructures, while
other models evoke a more active, “nano-snare” device
in which cellular interactions with the surface trigger lateral mechanical
reactions.[41,76−79] In either case, it is unclear
how a cell would compensate for either activity. However, microbial
activity such as the deposition of extracellular matrix and dead cells
has been shown to alter surface properties such as super hydrophobicity,[80] and it is possible that C. albicans biofilm foul the NSS during culture.
Figure 3
NSS induces an increase
in cell wall chitin. The CFW intensity
in the C. albicans cell walls is represented
as a grayscale value (y-axis) and is examined over
six time points (x-axis) on gold-coated flat and
NSS substrates.
NSS induces an increase
in cell wall chitin. The CFW intensity
in the C. albicans cell walls is represented
as a grayscale value (y-axis) and is examined over
six time points (x-axis) on gold-coated flat and
NSS substrates.
C. albicans Viability and Rupture on NSS
NSS with a high aspect ratio
nanoscale architecture rupture Gram-negative bacteria within moments
after contact.[53,54,79,81,82] We examined
changes to C. albicans cell morphology
on control and NSS materials using scanning electron microscopy. In
these experiments, we observed ruptured C. albicans cells on the NSS after 8 h of incubation on the NSS. These ruptured
cells resembled the ruptured Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast cells from previous work and appeared as deflated cells and
the deposition of cell wall remnants and other materials (Figure , second row, second
and third columns, arrows).[38]
Figure 4
Scanning electron
micrographs of the interaction of C. albicans with flat control surfaces and NSS. First
column C. albicans cells cultured on
a flat surface: top row, 0 h, an ovoid/intact cell; middle row at
8 h of contact, a cluster of ovoid/intact cells; bottom row 16 h of
contact, a large cluster of intact cells. Second column, top row,
two ovoid intact cells, the arrow denotes a common feature of NSS
interactions with yeast cells, a trough of crushed nanoscale cones;
the middle row 8 h of contact, a deflated yeast cell, arrow; and the
bottom row at 16 h of contact, a field of ruptured cells and cellular
debris that is identified by altered contrast (arrows).
Scanning electron
micrographs of the interaction of C. albicans with flat control surfaces and NSS. First
column C. albicans cells cultured on
a flat surface: top row, 0 h, an ovoid/intact cell; middle row at
8 h of contact, a cluster of ovoid/intact cells; bottom row 16 h of
contact, a large cluster of intact cells. Second column, top row,
two ovoid intact cells, the arrow denotes a common feature of NSS
interactions with yeast cells, a trough of crushed nanoscale cones;
the middle row 8 h of contact, a deflated yeast cell, arrow; and the
bottom row at 16 h of contact, a field of ruptured cells and cellular
debris that is identified by altered contrast (arrows).To complement these experiments, we labeled C. albicans cells with the vital dye FUN-1 and monitored
FUN-1 fluorescence
on control and experimental surfaces with confocal microscopy. FUN-1
is a ratio metric dye that is taken up and processed by living, metabolically
active fungal cells; upon cellular uptake, the FUN-1 dye fluoresces
red and in metabolically active cells the FUN-1 dye will be enzymatically
processed to a product with green fluorescence.[83] We observed a reduction in viability in C. albicans cells that have been exposed to NSS,
as indicated by loss/reduction of green FUN-1 fluorescence (Figures A, arrows, and S3). The maximal loss of green FUN-1 fluorescence
in cells that have been exposed to the NSS for 8 h and increased as
incubation time increased (Figure B).
Figure 5
Cell viability of C. albicans stained
with fluorescent dye FUN-1. Merged images showing cells labeled with
CFW (blue) and cells labeled with FUN-1. Cells labeling with green
fluorescence live cells and those only containing red cells (arrows)
are the dead or dying cells. (A) Representative confocal micrographs
of cells on either Flat control surface (first column) or NSS (second
column). (B) Graphical summary of the percentage of dead/dying cells
on each surface over the time recorded. **p values
< 0.001.
Cell viability of C. albicans stained
with fluorescent dye FUN-1. Merged images showing cells labeled with
CFW (blue) and cells labeled with FUN-1. Cells labeling with green
fluorescence live cells and those only containing red cells (arrows)
are the dead or dying cells. (A) Representative confocal micrographs
of cells on either Flat control surface (first column) or NSS (second
column). (B) Graphical summary of the percentage of dead/dying cells
on each surface over the time recorded. **p values
< 0.001.To confirm these results, we measured
lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)
release and metabolic activity in C. albicans cells cultured on control and NSS. Release of lactate dehydrogenase
(LDH) is indicative of cell rupture.[84]C. albicans cells exposed to NSS exhibited increased
LDH release relative to controls (Figure A). We also observed a reduction of total
cellular metabolic activity of C. albicans cells exposed to NSS, when compared to the control surfaces using
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT)
assay (Figure B).
The timing of C. albicans loss of viability/rupture
was preceded by NSS-induced increase in cell/wall chitin, suggesting
that NSS rupture may result from an early NSS-induced cell wall remodeling
response.
Figure 6
LDH and MTT assays of C. albicans exposed to control and NSS. (A) Normalized LDH release by C. albicans on NSS; (B) MTT assay of C. albicans on flat/control surfaces (gray columns),
NSS (white columns), and a negative control treatment with antifungal
drug voriconazole (black columns); y-axis shows absorbance
at 570 nm and x-axis shows time.
LDH and MTT assays of C. albicans exposed to control and NSS. (A) Normalized LDH release by C. albicans on NSS; (B) MTT assay of C. albicans on flat/control surfaces (gray columns),
NSS (white columns), and a negative control treatment with antifungal
drug voriconazole (black columns); y-axis shows absorbance
at 570 nm and x-axis shows time.When compared to the rates that have been demonstrated for bacterial
cell rupture via NSS, C. albicans ruptures
on NSS was slower, measured in hours versus minutes, and to a lesser
extent than bacterial cells.[85] Cellular
fungi such as C. albicans are larger
(i.e., 5 μm versus 1–2 μm), have a different shape
(i.e., ovoid versus cylindrical), and are structurally different from
bacterial cells with cell walls that are an order of magnitude stronger
than most bacterial cell walls.[86,87] The lower amount of
NSS-induced rupture of C. albicans cells
when compared to what has been described in the literature for bacteria
may reflect these structural/physical differences.
Surface Structure and Biofilm Formation
Many microbes
including cellular yeast respond to contact with
surfaces through the deposition of extracellular matrix.[34,88,89] We examined C.
albicans biofilm production in response to control
and NSS; we examined biofilm production using a crystal violet assay.[90] In control experiments, we observed an increase
in biofilm deposition as the culture ages, and after 24 h, we observed
a thick and mature biofilm (Figure A); however, C. albicans cells cultured on NSS showed a significantly reduced biofilm when
compared to the control surfaces (Figure B).
Figure 7
Biofilm formation of C. albicans on control and NSS. (A) Scanning electron micrograph of biofilm
formation of C. albicans on a flat
surface. (B) Crystal violet biofilm assay of C. albicans cultured on NSS and other surfaces. Quantification of crystal violet
at 550 nm absorbance collected in a microtiter plate at different
incubation time periods.
Biofilm formation of C. albicans on control and NSS. (A) Scanning electron micrograph of biofilm
formation of C. albicans on a flat
surface. (B) Crystal violet biofilm assay of C. albicans cultured on NSS and other surfaces. Quantification of crystal violet
at 550 nm absorbance collected in a microtiter plate at different
incubation time periods.
NSS Interactions
with C. albicans Hyphae
C. albicans is a
polymorphic fungus with hyphal morph that is associated with pathogenesis
and virulence.[11,17] Hyphal C. albicans exhibited no alteration in adhesion, viability, or loss of cell
integrity on NSS when compared to control surfaces, which suggests
that this morphological form of C. albicans responded differently to the NSS. However, NSS contact inhibits C. albicans ability to form a hyphal morphology.
In control experiments, we observed 80 ± 0.81% (n = 30) hyphal differentiation of the C. albicans microcolonies when cultured with a hyphal-induction medium. However,
microcolonies of C. albicans cultured
with this same medium on NSS never resulted in hyphal formation (Figure B, second column).
Other materials and conditions have been shown to inhibit C. albicans hyphal formation including natural and
synthetic peptides, plant-derived compounds, polymeric/oligomeric
materials, and metal oxide-based nanomaterials.[91−94] In some of these cases, a reduction
of biofilm was associated with the inhibition of hyphal formation.
Many of these conditions or treatments appear to interfere with the
chemical signals and quorum sensing pathways. The NSS results may
be the first example of a purely structural inhibition of hyphal morphogenesis.
Figure 8
NSS controls C. albicans morphogenesis.
(A) Schematic of the microcolony assay; (B) first column, C. albicans cultured on flat control surfaces in
differentiation media. Top image, confocal micrograph showing hyphal
formation (arrow); bottom image, SEM showing hyphal growth; second
column, C. albicans cultured in differentiation
medium on NSS. (Top) A representative confocal micrograph shows cellular
forms of C. albicans (arrow); bottom
image, an SEM showing a cluster of C. albicans cells, note the lack of any hyphae.
NSS controls C. albicans morphogenesis.
(A) Schematic of the microcolony assay; (B) first column, C. albicans cultured on flat control surfaces in
differentiation media. Top image, confocal micrograph showing hyphal
formation (arrow); bottom image, SEM showing hyphal growth; second
column, C. albicans cultured in differentiation
medium on NSS. (Top) A representative confocal micrograph shows cellular
forms of C. albicans (arrow); bottom
image, an SEM showing a cluster of C. albicans cells, note the lack of any hyphae.Contact-dependent/mechanical response or thigmotropism has been
observed in plant root tips and fungal hyphal growth.[95−100] Perturbation of these structures results in a stretching of the
cell wall and/or plasma membrane, thereby activating an intercellular
signaling cascade.[95] While microscale structures
have been shown to redirect the growth of fungal hyphae, this is among
the first nanoscale thigmotropic response that controls a genetic
process, i.e., fungal cell morphology switch. Many different environmental
conditions result in the switch from a cellular of C. albicans to a hyphal morphology including nutrient
levels, pH, temperature, and cell density[92,97,98] and is inhibited by the quorum sensing through
the activation of the cAMP-PKA pathway.[92,101,102] It is unclear how an NSS, an external mechanical
challenge, inhibits hyphal morphogenesis; however, in some fungal
species such as the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces
pombe there is some cross-talk between the cell wall
integrity and cAMP-PKA pathways,[103] which
suggests that mechanical cues may impinge pathways needed for hyphal
morphogenesis. Future work using genetic knockouts of components of
these pathways will be necessary to determine how interaction with
NSS controls intracellular signaling pathways to inhibit hyphal morphogenesis.
Conclusions
The application of NSS for the
control of bacterial biofilms has
made them an attractive alternative to or complement to traditional
antibiotics. The rupture of bacterial cells on native and synthetic
NSS is well documented and has been ascribed to physical incompatibility
between the bacterial cell and the surface that depends on cell wall
mechanics and NSS structure. However, a role of NSS for controlling
pathogenic fungal biofilms is not as clear. As an antifungal surface,
NSS lags significantly in both the timing and the amount of C. albicans rupture when compared to NSS bactericidal
effects. In medically relevant biofilms where fungal and bacterial
microbes coexist, this may lead to preferential selection for fungal
growth. The interaction between the cellular yeast cell and NSS may
be a more complex than that between bacteria and the NSS, perhaps
involving other surface properties and/or evoking different biological
responses. Understanding and controlling these differences will be
critical for NSS controls of microbial biofilm formation in medically
relevant situations.
Experimental Section
Yeast Strains and Cultures
A wild
type strain of C. albicans (ATCC 90028)
was grown in Sabouraud dextrose broth (SDB) at 25 °C in 50 mL
conical flasks. Depending on the experimental needs, cultures were
grown to the mid-log phase at an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) ∼0.6. OD600 measurements were made using
a Thermo Scientific Nanodrop 2000C spectrophotometer. To induce hyphal
growth, C. albicans was cultured in
a modified SDB media containing 10% bovine serum albumin (81066, Sigma-Aldrich)
in 50 mL conical flasks incubated overnight in a shaking incubator
at 37 °C and 200 rpm. Hyphal growth was indicated by the formation
of granular sediments in the growth media.
Surface
Preparation and Characterization
We investigated the interaction
of C. albicans cells with flat control
coverslips and compared to NSS from the
wing of the cicada, N. tibicen (BioQuip
Products, Inc., CA). Wings from whole cicadas were dissected from
the organism. Isolated wings were sonicated in 70% ethanol for 10
min to remove any contaminants, air-dried at room temperature, and
carefully cut into smaller pieces of size 5 mm × 5 mm. Glass
coverslips were cleaned using 70% ethanol. The cleaned sections of
the cicada wings were mounted on cleaned coverslips using silicone
glue (Silicone VC6-1/2). All of the surfaces (wings and coverslips)
used in the experiments were glow-coated with a 7 nm layer of gold
using a Leica EM ACE200; this was an additional control for differences
in surface composition. The surface energy was measured via contact
angle goniometry using a Rame-Hart 260-F4 goniometer and DROPIMAGE
advanced software. A volume of 3 μL of deionized water was used
on all surfaces, and the averages of four repetitions on similar surfaces
were calculated.
Culturing Conditions for
Imaging C. albicans Response to NSS
To examine the
interactions of C. albicans cells with
a different surface, the surfaces with cells were placed in a poly(ethylene
glycol) (PEG) 8000 treated (Sigma, Cat # 1546605) well of a 24-well
plate.; PEG treatment prevented nonspecific interactions of yeast
cells with nonexperimental surfaces. Cells were imaged using a Zeiss
Z1 Spinning disk confocal with a setting appropriate for each dye
set at six time points: 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 h.
Determining Cell Viability
The vital
dye, FUN-1 (ex ∼470/560–610 em1, em2 510–560), measures cell viability. Cells were labeled with
a 5 mM solution of FUN-1 stain (Molecular Probes F-7030). FUN-1-labeled C. albicans cells were imaged using a Zeiss Z1 spinning
disk confocal with excitation with the 488 laser and imaging with
simultaneously with the 515 nm filter and 561 nm filters settings
and the 100× objective. A CyQUANT MTT assay
kit (Life Technologies, Catalog#: V13154) was used to measure viabilty
and a CyQUANT LDH Cytotoxicity 2001 assay kit (Life Technologies,
Catalog#: C20300) to measure LDH. For these experiments, C. albicans yeast cultures were grown to an OD600 of 0.6/∼1 × 106 cells/mL. Negative
controls for these experiments were replicated C. albicans grown parallelly and treated with an antifungal drug (7 μg/mL)
voriconazole.
Densitometric Analysis
of C.
albicans Cell Wall Chitin
The fluorescent
dye Calcofluor white (CFW; ex, 370 nm/em 440 nm) binds chitin. C. albicans cells labeled with 1 μg/mL solution
of calcofluor white (CFW) (Sigma-Aldrich, 18909). The intensity values
were captured using Zen Blue Software from 100 images per sample/condition
per time point. All data were statistically analyzed using the ANOVA:
single-factor analysis, and statistical significance is denoted by
(*) for p ≤ 0.05 and (**) for p ≤ 0.001.
Biofilm Quantification
Biofilms formed
on different nanostructured surfaces were quantified by a crystal
violet microtiter dish biofilm formation assay as previously described.[90] The absorbance intensity of the crystal violet
dye is measured using a BioTek Synergy Mx plate reader at 550 nm.
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
C. albicans cells samples were prepared
on both the flat surfaces and NSS; cells were fixed overnight with
2.5% glutaraldehyde/2% formaldehyde solution in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer.
The samples were dehydrated by an ethanol series (e.g., 30, 50, 70,
95, and 100%) with 10 min washes/exchanges at each concentration.
The samples were air-dried, mounted onto aluminum SEM stubs, and coated
with a 5 nm gold layer using Leica EM ACE200. The samples were then
observed using a Zeiss Auriga scanning electron microscope.
Microcolony Assay
To determine the
effect of NSS on the morphogenesis of C. albicans from its cellular to its hyphal morphology, we performed a microcolony
assay; 100 μL of C. albicans yeast
was cultured in a modified SBD medium that contained 10% bovine serum
albumin and was placed on control and experimental surfaces and incubated
at 37 °C overnight. C. albicans cellular forms that had been cultured in SBD media and C. albicans hyphal forms that had been induced on
glass coverslips served as negative and positive controls. To evaluate
the microcolony assay, microcolony C. albicans cultures on control and NSS were washed twice with PBS, labeled
with CFW, and imaged using a confocal microscope as described above.
Authors: Alexandre Persat; Carey D Nadell; Minyoung Kevin Kim; Francois Ingremeau; Albert Siryaporn; Knut Drescher; Ned S Wingreen; Bonnie L Bassler; Zemer Gitai; Howard A Stone Journal: Cell Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Phuc H Le; Duy H K Nguyen; Arturo Aburto Medina; Denver P Linklater; Christian Loebbe; Russell J Crawford; Shane MacLaughlin; Elena P Ivanova Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 5.076