Literature DB >> 33490255

Interactions of Consanguinity and Number of Siblings with Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Ameer Kakaje1, Mohammad Marwan Alhalabi1, Ayham Ghareeb1, Bahjat Karam1, Bassam Mansour1, Bayan Zahra1, Othman Hamdan2.   

Abstract

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a common malignancy in children. Consanguinity has a high prevalence in developing countries and increases the probability of homozygosity for many genes which may affect ALL and its prognosis. We conducted a study to explore the impact of consanguinity and number of siblings on ALL as there are currently no studies to describe this effect. Data were collected from patients' records from the Children's University Hospital of Damascus University, which is the major cancer centre for children in Syria. This study included 193 children with ALL over one year. Number of siblings was not with the French-American-British (FAB) classification, gender, ALL subtype, or risk of ALL children. When comparing consanguinity degrees and complete blood counts at diagnosis, significant contradicting data were found in the third-degree and fourth-degree consanguinity when compared to one another and to not having consanguineous parents as third degree consanguinity was associated with normal platelets but lower WBC counts, and fourth-degree consanguinity was associated with normal haemoglobin levels and WBC counts, but lower platelet counts. Having consanguineous parents was also associated with acquiring ALL at an older age, L2 FAB classification, having a positive family history for malignancies, and not having hepatosplenomegaly (P < 0.05). Although L2 is known to be a poor prognosis indicatory, no association was found with consanguinity and risk. Finally, no association was found with ALL subtype or risk (P > 0.05). Although consanguinity and number of siblings have affected some variables and prognostic features of childhood ALL, the aetiology is not clear and we need further studies to clarify such an association as this will help in optimising therapy and accurately determine the risk.
Copyright © 2020 Ameer Kakaje et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33490255      PMCID: PMC7787732          DOI: 10.1155/2020/7919310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


  40 in total

1.  Consanguineous marriages : Preconception consultation in primary health care settings.

Authors:  Hanan Hamamy
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-11-22

2.  High white blood cell count at diagnosis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: biological background and prognostic impact. Results from the NOPHO ALL-92 and ALL-2000 studies.

Authors:  Goda Vaitkevičienė; Erik Forestier; Marit Hellebostad; Mats Heyman; Olafur G Jonsson; Päivi M Lähteenmäki; Susanne Rosthoej; Stefan Söderhäll; Kjeld Schmiegelow
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Is consanguineous marriage historically encouraged?

Authors:  Mostafa Saadat
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  2008-01

4.  Toward a total cure for acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Ching-Hon Pui
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Parental consanguineous marriages and clinical response to chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Mostafa Saadat; Maryam Khalili; Shahpour Omidvari; Maryam Ansari-Lari
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Number of siblings and the risk of lymphoma, leukemia, and myeloma by histopathology.

Authors:  Andrea Altieri; Felipe Castro; Justo Lorenzo Bermejo; Kari Hemminki
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Inbreeding effects on fetal growth and development.

Authors:  P S Rao; S G Inbaraj
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Outcomes for children and adolescents with cancer: challenges for the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Malcolm A Smith; Nita L Seibel; Sean F Altekruse; Lynn A G Ries; Danielle L Melbert; Maura O'Leary; Franklin O Smith; Gregory H Reaman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Is consanguinity prevalence decreasing in Saudis?: A study in two generations.

Authors:  Arjumand Sultan Warsy; May Hamad Al-Jaser; Abeer Albdass; Sooad Al-Daihan; Mohammad Alanazi
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.927

10.  Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs.

Authors:  Ghazi O Tadmouri; Pratibha Nair; Tasneem Obeid; Mahmoud T Al Ali; Najib Al Khaja; Hanan A Hamamy
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.