Literature DB >> 33490133

Optimisation of Scores Generated by an Online Feline Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Instrument to Assist the Veterinary User Interpret Its Results.

Vinny Davies1, Jacqueline Reid2, E Marian Scott3.   

Abstract

Using methodology previously described for the dog health-related quality of life (HRQL) tool (VetMetrica™), the aim was to optimize the scores profile of a comparable feline online HRQL instrument for monitoring HRQL in cats, to assist in its interpretation. Measuring HRQL helps quantify the impact of disease and its treatment on well-being, aids clinical decision making and provides information in clinical trials. In Study 1, using data collected from previous studies, scores generated for three domains of HRQL (Vitality, Comfort, Emotional Well-being) in healthy cats were normalized using standard statistical techniques of logit transformation and T-scores, such that the average healthy cat has a score of 50 in all three HRQL domains. Using normalized scores from healthy and sick cats, a threshold score of 44.8 was determined, above which 70% of healthy cats should score. Study 2 determined the Minimal Important Difference (MID) in normalized score that constituted a clinically significant improvement in each domain. Three methods were tested in order to determine the MID, with the final choice made based on statistical and clinical considerations. Thresholds of 5, 7.5, and 5 were chosen for the three HRQL domains representing Vitality, Comfort and Emotional Well-being, respectively. This study makes available a means of displaying HRQL scores from an online application in an easily interpretable manner and quantifies a clinically meaningful improvement in score. To illustrate the practical application of these developments, three case examples are presented. Example 1 illustrates the raw and normalized scores for a group of overweight cats enrolled in a Feline Weight Management Programme. Example 2 shows three groups of osteoarthritic cats, each with different severity of disease. The third is an elderly, un-well cat whose HRQL was recorded over time, specifically to facilitate end of life discussion between owner and veterinary clinician.
Copyright © 2021 Davies, Reid and Scott.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cats; health status; health-related quality of life; interpretability; minimum important difference; optimisation; score normalization; threshold

Year:  2021        PMID: 33490133      PMCID: PMC7815521          DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.601304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Vet Sci        ISSN: 2297-1769


  23 in total

1.  The logistic transform for bounded outcome scores.

Authors:  Emmanuel Lesaffre; Dimitris Rizopoulos; Roula Tsonaka
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Users' guides to the medical literature. XII. How to use articles about health-related quality of life. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; C D Naylor; E Juniper; D K Heyland; R Jaeschke; D J Cook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  R A Deyo; R M Centor
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

4.  Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments.

Authors:  G Guyatt; S Walter; G Norman
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Development, initial validation and reliability testing of a web-based, generic feline health-related quality-of-life instrument.

Authors:  Cory E Noble; Lesley M Wiseman-Orr; Marian E Scott; Andrea M Nolan; Jacky Reid
Journal:  J Feline Med Surg       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.015

Review 6.  Interpretation of quality of life changes.

Authors:  E Lydick; R S Epstein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation.

Authors:  M H Liang; A H Fossel; M G Larson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Evaluation of a questionnaire for obtaining owner-perceived, weighted quality-of-life assessments for dogs with spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  Christine M Budke; Jonathan M Levine; Sharon C Kerwin; Gwendolyn J Levine; Bianca F Hettlich; Margaret R Slater
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 1.936

9.  Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status.

Authors:  L E Kazis; J J Anderson; R F Meenan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Interpreting the results of patient reported outcome measures in clinical trials: the clinician's perspective.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Elie A Akl; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  1 in total

1.  Technology-enhanced weight-loss program in multiple-cat households: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Barr N Hadar; Kenneth J Lambrecht; Zvonimir Poljak; Jason B Coe; Elizabeth A Stone; Adronie Verbrugghe; Theresa M Bernardo
Journal:  J Feline Med Surg       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 1.971

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.