Literature DB >> 33489730

Lung Ultrasound in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Vito Cianci1, Mirko Zanatta2.   

Abstract

Lung ultrasound (LUS) is one of the most important and innovative applications in emergency and critical care medicine for the management of critically ill patients. Ultrasound has been widely used in the COVID-19 pandemic as an extremely reliable technique and has proved to have a key role in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with acute respiratory failure. The diagnostic accuracy of LUS is higher than chest X-ray and similar to computed tomography, which is considered the gold standard. COVID-19 pneumonia has some distinctive ultrasonographic signs but not pathognomonic, and LUS significantly improves the management of COVID-19 patients speeding up the diagnostic path. The examination is bedside; reduces the risk of contamination, avoiding mobilization of the patients; cuts down the amount of radioactive exposure; and gives real-time answers to many diagnostic and therapeutic doubts. Finally, the instruments are small and the scanner and the probes can be protected from contamination easily. Copyright:
© 2020 Journal of Cardiovascular Echography.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; lung ultrasound; pandemic; pneumonia

Year:  2020        PMID: 33489730      PMCID: PMC7811698          DOI: 10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_50_20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Echogr        ISSN: 2211-4122


INTRODUCTION

Lung ultrasound (LUS) is one of the most important and innovative applications in emergency and critical care medicine, and its use has significantly changed the management of critically ill patients.[1234] Ultrasound has grown more relevant in the last years with the availability of new, small, handheld machines that can be carried to patients' beds and installed in different settings, both in hospital departments (emergency medicine, cardiology, internal medicine, pneumology, geriatric, infectious disease, surgery, and intensive care unit) and out of hospital on ambulances or helicopters. Ultrasound has been widely used in the COVID-19 pandemic as an extremely reliable technique.[56789] It can be adapted to all settings where patients are managed, gives rapid and clear answers, and is safe and cost-effective. It reduces the amount of radioactive exposure, permits to monitor the lung lesions, gives real-time answers to specific clinical questions and an important feedback about the effects of pharmacological treatment and ventilation. In addition, the possibility to perform the examination bedside without moving the patient reduces the risk of contamination. Hence, LUS is considered suitable for an extensive use in the COVID-19 pandemic, according to the original meaning of critical ultrasound: “when there is a dangerous performance gap between the patient status and the resources available for an appropriate decision-making and problem-solving.”[210]

METHODS

The technique could be extremely different according to the clinical conditions, which range from patients without any symptoms to those with severe respiratory insufficiency, and to the setting (emergency department, medical department, and intensive care unit).[13] Patients with a suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection are usually placed in a supine position or seated on the bed in order to examine the posterior and basal areas of the lungs.[1112] Those with severe respiratory distress syndrome or treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or a noninvasive ventilation (NIV) are usually placed in a supine position with an elevation of the chest of 30°–45°, reducing the possibility to scan the posterior regions. Collaborative patients can be slightly turned on the right and left sides using a pillow or a rolled-up blanket. On the other side, the anterior areas are hidden when “the prone swimmer position,” is used for prone position ventilation. The elevation of the shoulder with a pillow, as described by Uglade, forms a space to put the transducer and opens an important window toward the anterior parts of the chest.[13] In terms of choosing the probe, LUS is usually performed with a 3.5 MHz convex transducer for the identification of the lung profile (A: dry; B: wet[14]), consolidations, and pleural effusions, with a high-frequency linear probe (7.5–12 MHz) for a more precise and accurate evaluation of the pleural line, lung sliding, and subpleural consolidations. Color Doppler function is sometimes useful for better characterization of lung consolidations.[12] A suitable presetting of the scanner is mandatory, selecting the appropriate lung preset and gain, for the best visualization of the pleura and B-lines. If a lung preset is not available, the abdomen preset should be chosen. The most comprehensive examination, in a patient with a suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection, includes the 12-regions technique, which also permits to scan the posterior areas of the lungs [Figure 1].[31112]
Figure 1

The 12-regions technique in patients with suspected COVID-19 pneumonia

The 12-regions technique in patients with suspected COVID-19 pneumonia One of the methods that has been recently established worldwide[1112] suggests to divide each lung into six regions, which are generated by the intersections of the parasternal line (PSL), anterior axillary line (AAL), posterior axillary line (PAL), and paravertebral line (PVL) with the horizontal intermammillary line: regions 1 and 2 denote the anterior superior and anterior inferior areas; regions 3 and 4 represent the lateral superior and lateral inferior areas; and regions 5 and 6 represent the posterior superior and inferior areas. The examination usually starts from the PSL searching for the lung sliding longitudinally, moves downward and laterally toward the AAL, PAL, and PVL; then, it is necessary to complete the scan with transversal and oblique scans, to prevent the posterior shadowing of the ribs. This panoramic examination of the chest is called “the lawn mower technique” [Figure 2].[1112]
Figure 2

Lung ultrasound sequence in the 12-regions technique

Lung ultrasound sequence in the 12-regions technique The operator must pay attention to protect himself/herself from the risk of contamination during the bedside examination of patients with suspected COVID-19 infection: an appropriate separation from the face of the patient must be guaranteed to prevent accidental contact with the infectious droplets that come from sneezes, cough, nebulizer, CPAP, and NIV; the use of individual protection devices is mandatory. Intubated patients might slightly reduce the risk of contamination because the airways are sealed by the endotracheal tube. Finally, the ultrasound must be adequately prepared by covering both the machine and the probes with disposable protections and cleaned with an appropriate cleanser at the end of the examination.

SEMEIOTICS

COVID-19 pneumonia has some distinctive ultrasonographic patterns but not pathognomonic; these patterns can also be found in many other bacterial or viral pneumonia and in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [Table 1].[141516]
Table 1

The ultrasonographic and computed tomography characteristics of COVID-19 pneumonia

Lung ultrasoundCT scan
Irregular or thickened pleural lineThickened pleura
B-lines (rare, confluent, and multifocal)Ground-glass aspects
Subpleural consolidationsSubpleural consolidations
Rare pleural effusionsRare pleural effusions
Bilateral distributionBilateral distribution

CT=Computed tomography

The ultrasonographic and computed tomography characteristics of COVID-19 pneumonia CT=Computed tomography The most important features can be sought in three lung landmarks: Pleural line Subpleural area Costophrenic angle. The most important finding in the COVID-19 pneumonia is the “B-line,” which may appear as isolated and nonhomogeneous vertical artifacts or as a storm of aggregated and fused lines in the “white lung” pattern; in the middle, there are all the intermediate clinical pictures of the interstitial syndrome [Figure 3].[41415]
Figure 3

Confluent B-lines in COVID-19 pneumonia

Confluent B-lines in COVID-19 pneumonia They start from the pleural line or from lung consolidations, in a way that resembles other interstitial pneumonia. Nevertheless, in COVID-19 pneumonia, a wide and bright B-line has been often observed, which looks like a “light beam” that switches on and off when the patient breaths.[9] Areas of a normal lung are usually next to pathological findings, and the “light beam” sign represents an early manifestation of a lung lesion [Figure 4].
Figure 4

The “light beam” effect

The “light beam” effect Pleural line is often irregular and thickened, and even short interruptions of the line are observed in correspondence with lung consolidations [Figures 5 and 6]. The distribution of these findings is irregular, patchy, and not homogeneous, and they should be scanned and studied with a high-frequency linear probe.[41415]
Figure 5

Irregular pleural line in COVID-19 interstitial syndrome

Figure 6

Interstitial syndrome with multiple B-lines, irregular pleural line, and subpleural mini-consolidations

Irregular pleural line in COVID-19 interstitial syndrome Interstitial syndrome with multiple B-lines, irregular pleural line, and subpleural mini-consolidations Subpleural consolidations are another important pathological feature of COVID-19 pneumonia: they are mainly small, hypoechoic consolidations, located under the pleural line; they are usually identified in both lungs, have different shapes (triangular, circular, and stretched), and do not have any color-Doppler echo [Figures 5–7].[41415]
Figure 7

Subpleural consolidation with an interrupted pleural line

Subpleural consolidation with an interrupted pleural line Larger consolidations are the ultrasonographic sign of pneumonia, which are often observed in the posterior areas, in severe and advanced lung disease, and caused by the high local inflammation. These lesions have nonhomogeneous echogenicity, B-line artifacts at the far-field margin, and both air and fluid bronchograms [Figures 8 and 9].[41517]
Figure 8

Subpleural consolidation with air bronchograms

Figure 9

Thickened and irregular pleural line with small subpleural consolidation

Subpleural consolidation with air bronchograms Thickened and irregular pleural line with small subpleural consolidation Small and thin pleural effusions can be found next to the lung consolidations, whereas either moderate or severe pleural effusions are not usually observed in COVID-19 pneumonia [Figure 10].[4141517]
Figure 10

Small pleural fluid collection

Small pleural fluid collection

DIAGNOSIS, MONITORING, AND STRATIFICATION

LUS is an important and adaptable tool, and it represents the first step of the instrumental evaluation in a patient suspected of having COVID-19 infection. The triad of COVID-19's diagnostic pathway involves chest X-ray, computed tomography (CT) scan, and ultrasound. LUS has demonstrated to be relevant and unique to rule in or rule out an interstitial syndrome; it has a high sensitivity and a moderate specificity, and the global accuracy is higher than that of the chest X-ray.[12] The performance of ultrasound in COVID-19 infection resembles, in many situations and settings, a CT scan of the chest, which is considered the gold standard. Although COVID-19 infection does not have a pathognomonic lung pattern, resembling other bacterial or viral pneumonia and ARDS, many studies have already demonstrated the capability of ultrasound to identify some typical lung features of COVID-19 pneumonia. The ultrasonographic and CT characteristics of COVID-19 pneumonia are described in Table 1.[141516] On the other hand, COVID-19 has some lung characteristics that are completely different from those observed in a cardiogenic pulmonary edema, and the differences are summarized in Table 2.[12]
Table 2

Lung ultrasound differences between cardiogenic pulmonary edema and COVID-19 pneumonia

Cardiogenic pulmonary edemaCOVID-19 pneumonia
Homogeneous interstitial syndromeNonhomogeneous interstitial syndrome
No “spared areas”Spared areas
The absence of the “light beam” signThe presence of the “light beam” sign
Normal pleural lineThickened and irregular pleural line
Normal slidingNormal sliding/reduced in advanced disease
Absence of consolidationsSmall subpleural consolidations
Pleural effusionsSmall or no pleural effusions
Lung ultrasound differences between cardiogenic pulmonary edema and COVID-19 pneumonia In addition, a new interesting role of ultrasound is gaining importance: the monitoring of patients and the estimation of prognosis. It can estimate short-term prognosis effectively; in particular, it has a high negative predictive value and it can identify early pleural and lung lesions and can predict worsening of clinical conditions. When LUS is performed together with point-of-care echocardiography combined with the evaluation of inferior vena cava, it can also be used to monitor patients with COIVD-19 pneumonia in a step-by-step manner. It enables physicians to evaluate the effect of pharmacological and fluid therapy; to set CPAP, NIV, and ventilator properly; to monitor the effect of ventilation on alveolar recruitment; and to guide weaning from mechanical ventilator. This new trend is in tune with the guidelines published by the most important international scientific societies, which consider critical ultrasound a useful diagnostic tool and an efficient instrument for monitoring and guiding the management of critically ill patients.[31819] In all these settings and situations, LUS maintains a high predictive value when it is strictly connected with all the other information that come from the patient's history, in particular the time related to the onset of the disease, physical examination, and laboratory and radiological findings.

CONCLUSIONS

LUS has all the features that make it a perfect, reliable, and adaptable instrument during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cost-effective High sensitivity Good specificity No radioactive exposure Bedside Reduced diagnostic time Reduced patient movements, thereby lowering the risk of contamination Prognostic capabilities Bedside monitoring. LUS has become a modern and effective operative example that can be exploited in the management of a major global emergency, like the COVID-19 pandemic, where there is a gap between the current needs and the available resources.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  19 in total

Review 1.  International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound.

Authors:  Giovanni Volpicelli; Mahmoud Elbarbary; Michael Blaivas; Daniel A Lichtenstein; Gebhard Mathis; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Lawrence Melniker; Luna Gargani; Vicki E Noble; Gabriele Via; Anthony Dean; James W Tsung; Gino Soldati; Roberto Copetti; Belaid Bouhemad; Angelika Reissig; Eustachio Agricola; Jean-Jacques Rouby; Charlotte Arbelot; Andrew Liteplo; Ashot Sargsyan; Fernando Silva; Richard Hoppmann; Raoul Breitkreutz; Armin Seibel; Luca Neri; Enrico Storti; Tomislav Petrovic
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Toward an ultrasound curriculum for critical care medicine.

Authors:  Luca Neri; Enrico Storti; Daniel Lichtenstein
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 3.  Thoracic ultrasonography: a narrative review.

Authors:  P H Mayo; R Copetti; D Feller-Kopman; G Mathis; E Maury; S Mongodi; F Mojoli; G Volpicelli; M Zanobetti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically lll.

Authors:  Phillips Perera; Thomas Mailhot; David Riley; Diku Mandavia
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Can Lung US Help Critical Care Clinicians in the Early Diagnosis of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pneumonia?

Authors:  Erika Poggiali; Alessandro Dacrema; Davide Bastoni; Valentina Tinelli; Elena Demichele; Pau Mateo Ramos; Teodoro Marcianò; Matteo Silva; Andrea Vercelli; Andrea Magnacavallo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Sonographic signs and patterns of COVID-19 pneumonia.

Authors:  Giovanni Volpicelli; Luna Gargani
Journal:  Ultrasound J       Date:  2020-04-21

Review 7.  Is There a Role for Lung Ultrasound During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Authors:  Gino Soldati; Andrea Smargiassi; Riccardo Inchingolo; Danilo Buonsenso; Tiziano Perrone; Domenica Federica Briganti; Stefano Perlini; Elena Torri; Alberto Mariani; Elisa Eleonora Mossolani; Francesco Tursi; Federico Mento; Libertario Demi
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Thoracic ultrasound and SARS-COVID-19: a pictorial essay.

Authors:  Soccorsa Sofia; Andrea Boccatonda; Marco Montanari; Michele Spampinato; Damiano D'ardes; Giulio Cocco; Esterita Accogli; Francesco Cipollone; Cosima Schiavone
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2020-04-16

9.  COVID-19 outbreak: less stethoscope, more ultrasound.

Authors:  Danilo Buonsenso; Davide Pata; Antonio Chiaretti
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 30.700

10.  Proposal for International Standardization of the Use of Lung Ultrasound for Patients With COVID-19: A Simple, Quantitative, Reproducible Method.

Authors:  Gino Soldati; Andrea Smargiassi; Riccardo Inchingolo; Danilo Buonsenso; Tiziano Perrone; Domenica Federica Briganti; Stefano Perlini; Elena Torri; Alberto Mariani; Elisa Eleonora Mossolani; Francesco Tursi; Federico Mento; Libertario Demi
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Acute management of COVID-19 in the emergency department: An evidence-based review.

Authors:  Kundavaram P P Abhilash; Sandeep David; Emma V St Joseph; John V Peter
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2022-02-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.