Literature DB >> 33489604

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: Outcome of Patients After Treatment in Otolaryngology Clinics.

Montasir Junaid1, Sadaf Qadeer Ahmed2, Maliha Kazi3, Hareem U Khan4, Muhammad Sohail Halim5.   

Abstract

Introduction Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a different entity from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Patients with LPR usually present with a variety of symptoms such as hoarseness, voice fatigue, burning sensation in the throat, persistent cough, sore throat, dysphagia, a sensation of a lump in the throat, and chronic throat clearing. The management of LPR is based on medications (proton pump inhibitors) along with lifestyle and dietary modifications. It has been suggested that the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score (RFS) are useful parameters to assess patients with LPR. The aim of this study is to assess the subjective and objective benefits of RFS and RSI for diagnosing and management of LPR in the tertiary care center and to find the difference in RSI and RSI scoring with respect to gender. Methods A prospective study was performed and 102 patients were included according to inclusion criteria. RFS and RSI questionnaires were filled on the first visit of patients and then treatment with proton pump inhibitors was started along with lifestyle modification instructions. Questionnaires were filled after four weeks and then 12weeks post-treatment. Repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the mean RFS and RSI from baseline to the end of treatment. The post hoc analysis was done using the Bonferroni test of multiple comparisons. An independent sample t-test was also used to compare the mean RFS and RSI between genders. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant Results RFS and RSI were found to be significantly decreased post-treatment after four weeks and 12 weeks post-treatment (p-value- <0.01). Eight point eight percent (8.8%) side effects were observed in the study, the change in quality of life after a three-month treatment was significantly improved among 62.7% patients, and 75.5% did lifestyle modifications. In the mean comparison of RFS and RSI with respect to gender, it was observed that the mean RFS of females samples after one month and three months of treatment were significantly less as compared to male samples, p<0.01. There was no significant mean difference observed for RSI after one month and three months of treatment with respect to gender (p>0.05). Conclusion RFS and RSI are convenient and helpful for diagnosing LPR, and they can be easily implemented in ear, nose, throat (ENT) clinics for the subjective and objective assessment of LPR. Females showed greater improvement on laryngoscopy findings (RFS scores) post-treatment as compared to males.
Copyright © 2020, Junaid et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laryngopharyngeal reflux disease; rfs; rsi

Year:  2020        PMID: 33489604      PMCID: PMC7816050          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  20 in total

1.  Monitoring of laryngopharyngeal reflux: influence of meals and beverages.

Authors:  Conrad F Smit; Lisbeth M H Mathus-Vliegen; Pieter P Devriese; Justin A M J van Leeuwen; Astrid Semin
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of upper probe measurements in normal subjects and patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  Albert L Merati; Hyun J Lim; Seckin O Ulualp; Robert J Toohill
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Laryngeal mucosa: its susceptibility to damage by acid and pepsin.

Authors:  David M Bulmer; Mahmoud S Ali; Iain A Brownlee; Peter W Dettmar; Jeffrey P Pearson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Patients with isolated laryngopharyngeal reflux are not obese.

Authors:  Stacey L Halum; Gregory N Postma; Crawford Johnston; Peter C Belafsky; Jamie A Koufman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  The Reliability of the Reflux Finding Score Among General Otolaryngologists.

Authors:  Brent A Chang; S Danielle MacNeil; Murray D Morrison; Patricia K Lee
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Pharyngeal pH monitoring in 222 patients with suspected laryngeal reflux.

Authors:  T R Eubanks; P E Omelanczuk; N Maronian; A Hillel; C E Pope; C A Pellegrini
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Role of refluxed acid in pathogenesis of laryngeal disorders.

Authors:  R J Toohill; J C Kuhn
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-11-24       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Reflux symptom index and reflux finding score in otolaryngologic practice.

Authors:  Walter Habermann; Christoph Schmid; Kurt Neumann; Trevor Devaney; Heinz F Hammer
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 9.  The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury.

Authors:  J A Koufman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score in Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Authors:  M Pokharel; I Shrestha; A Dhakal; B Purbey; R C Amatya
Journal:  Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ)       Date:  2016 Oct.-Dec.
View more
  1 in total

1.  Distinct microbiota dysbiosis in patients with laryngopharynx reflux disease compared to healthy controls.

Authors:  Han Chen; Huixiang Wang; Fan Yang; Maoxin Wang; Xianming Chen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.503

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.