Literature DB >> 33489473

The dark side of ferroptosis in pancreatic cancer.

Jiao Liu1, Enyong Dai2, Rui Kang3, Guido Kroemer4,5,6,7,8, Daolin Tang1,3.   

Abstract

Drug-induced ferroptosis, an iron-dependent regulatory necrosis, has been proposed for the therapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, genetically engineered mouse models have revealed that high-iron diets or deletion of pancreatic GPX4 (a key repressor of ferroptosis) accelerate the development of mutant Kras-driven PDAC by activating the STING1/TMEM173-dependent DNA sensor pathway. Abbreviations ADM: acinar-to-ductal metaplasia; CGAS: cyclic GMP-AMP synthase; DAMP: damage-associated molecular pattern; GPX4: glutathione peroxidase 4; GEMM: genetically engineered mouse models; PDAC: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; PanIN: pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, SLC7A11: solute carrier family 7 member 11; STING1: cGAMP-stimulator of interferon response cGAMP interactor 1; TME: tumor microenvironment; 8-OHG: 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine.
© 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; damp; ferroptosis; immunity; macrophages; pancreatic cancer; pancreatitis; sting1

Year:  2021        PMID: 33489473      PMCID: PMC7801118          DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1868691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


Ferroptosis is an iron-dependent necrotic-like process in which cells use excessive lipid peroxidation signals to trigger plasma membrane damage and release of intracellular contents.[1] The induction of ferroptosis can be divided into two categories: biological versus chemical. In particular, chemical inhibition of the extrinsic cystine/glutamate antiporter system xc− or the intrinsic glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) is the classical method to trigger ferroptosis. In recent years, this type of regulated cell death has attracted great attention in oncology, because the process can suppress the growth of many types of tumors and improve the efficacy of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy. For example, selective and conditional depletion of pancreatic solute carrier family 7 member 11 (Slc7a11, a structural component of system xc−) inhibits pancreatic tumorigenesis in mice.[2] However, there is also accumulating evidence that abnormal ferroptotic response may play oncogenic roles in tumor progression by reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment (TME).[3] Our recent preclinical animal studies (using pancreas-specific Gpx4 knockout mice) and clinical retrospective analyses document that ferroptotic damage promotes pancreatic tumorigenesis[4] (Figure 1), raising new concerns about the harmful impact of ferroptosis in tumor biology.
Figure 1.

Ferroptotic damage promotes Kras-driven pancreatic tumorigenesis by macrophage polarization. The induction of ferroptotic damage by high-iron diets or Gpx4 depletion in pancreatic acinar cells promotes the release of nuclear DNA containing 8-hydroxy-2ʹ-deoxyguanosine (8-OHG) into the cytosol and thus activates the STING1-dependent DNA sensor pathway, resulting in macrophage infiltration and polarization during Kras-driven PDAC in mice

Ferroptotic damage promotes Kras-driven pancreatic tumorigenesis by macrophage polarization. The induction of ferroptotic damage by high-iron diets or Gpx4 depletion in pancreatic acinar cells promotes the release of nuclear DNA containing 8-hydroxy-2ʹ-deoxyguanosine (8-OHG) into the cytosol and thus activates the STING1-dependent DNA sensor pathway, resulting in macrophage infiltration and polarization during Kras-driven PDAC in mice

Ferroptosis mediates experimental pancreatitis

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive and lethal malignant tumors, mainly driven by integrated signals involved in gene mutations (e.g., universal Kras mutation) and the inflammatory microenvironment. While the cell of origin of PDAC has been controversial, acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM) of the pancreas is an early initiation event of pancreatic tumorigenesis. Pancreatitis is a sterile inflammation of the pancreas caused by the death of acinar cells, which account for about 99% of all secretory cells in the pancreas. Epidemiological studies have found that both acute and chronic pancreatitis is associated with an increased risk of developing PDAC. Mouse studies further confirm that experimental pancreatitis induced by cerulein (an analogue of cholecystokinin) or high-fat diets accelerates mutant Kras-induced formation of ADM, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), as well as stromal responses in the pancreas. Our animal study demonstrated that high-iron diets or the conditional knockout of Gpx4 in the pancreas (genotype: Pdx1-Cre;Gpx4) promoted experimental pancreatitis in mice induced by the administration of cerulein or L-arginine (a conditionally essential amino acid).[4] In contrast, liproxstatin-1 (a ferroptosis inhibitor) reversed this type of pancreatic inflammatory damage,[4] suggesting a pathogenic role for ferroptosis in experimental pancreatitis. Since trypsin activity is considered to be the main trigger mechanism of acinar cell death, it appears interesting to determine whether the serine protease trypsin is a direct effector of ferroptosis.

Ferroptosis facilitates Kras-driven pancreatic tumorigenesis

In the past decade, a variety of genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) of PDAC have been developed. Such models incorporate KRAS mutations and other changes in tumor suppressor genes (e.g., mutation of tumor protein p53 [Tp53] or deletion of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A [Cdkn2a]). These models have different characteristics, and none of them perfectly mimics the clinical pathology of PDAC. Among these GEMMs, two basic models, including the Pdx1-Cre;Kras mice (termed KC) and Pdx1-Cre;KrasR172H/+ mice (termed KPC), are widely used to study the signals, mechanisms, and therapeutic modulation of PDAC. Compared with KC, KPC shows faster histopathological progress, especially poor vascularity, fibrosis, local invasion, and metastatic dissemination. We observed that, in KC mice with additional pancreatic Gpx4 depletion (genotype: Pdx1-Cre;Kras) or a high-iron diet, injections of the ferroptosis inhibitor lipoxstatin-1 protected against Kras-driven animal death as well as pancreatic pathology (e.g., PanIN) and molecular changes.[4] In contrast, depletion of pancreatic Slc7a11 in KPC mice (that in contrast to KC mice also lack mutant TP53) yields a different phenotype, suggesting that induction of ferroptosis limits mutant Kras/Tp53-induced pancreatic tumorigenesis.[2] Regardless of the non-ferroptosis regulating function of SLC7A11 (e.g., in amino acid metabolism), these GEMM studies indicate that Tp53 may switch the oncogene-like function of ferroptotic damage (observed in KC mice) to a tumor-suppressive function (observed in KPC mice). Indeed, TP53 plays a dual role in ferroptosis, depending on both transcriptional and non-transcriptional functions of TP53.

Ferroptotic damage reprograms macrophages for pancreatic tumorigenesis

PDAC has a unique TME, which forms a dynamic network of mutual supports between cancer and non-cancer cells, resulting in immune escape. Macrophages are an essential part of the pancreatic TME and can switch from an M1-like to an M2-like phenotype to sustain the growth of pancreatic tumors. Consistently, we observed the increased polarization of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in KC mice with Gpx4 depletion or a high-iron diet.[4] These ferroptotic PDAC mice had higher mRNA expression of markers of M1-like macrophages (e.g., tumor necrosis factor [Tnf] and interleukin 6 [Il6]) at 3 months and of M2-like macrophages (e.g., nitric oxide synthase 2 [Nos2/iNos] and arginase-1 [Arg1]) at 6 months. This ferroptotic macrophage M1→M2 polarization was reversed by the ferroptosis inhibitor lipoxstatin-1.[4] Importantly, the depletion of TAMs using clodronate liposomes blocked the ferroptotic damage-accelerated pancreatic tumorigenesis in KC mice.[4] Further mechanistic studies have shown that the release of 8-hydroxy-2ʹ-deoxyguanosine (8-OHG) produced by ferroptosis-associated oxidative DNA damage promoted Kras-driven pancreatic tumorigenesis by activating the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (CGAS)-cGAMP-stimulator of interferon response cGAMP interactor 1 (STING1/STING/TMEM1173) pathway in macrophages.[4] Consequently, administration of anti-8-OHG antibodies or the depletion of Sting1 prevented pancreatic tumorigenesis accelerated by Gpx4 depletion or high-iron diet-induced.[4] Furthermore, bioinformatics analyses of the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) analysis correlated the mortality of PDAC patients with low mRNA expression of GPX4 combined with high mRNA expression of STING1 in the tumors.[4] These findings establish a direct role for the chronic activation of the cytosolic DNA sensor pathway in driving ferroptosis-related PDAC.

Conclusion and outlook

Our mouse studies indicate that ferroptotic signaling drives macrophage-induced adaptive immune suppression in Kras-induced PDAC (Figure 1). We provide the first evidence that 8-OHG functions as a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) during ferroptotic cell death to trigger STING1-dependent macrophage polarization, supporting pancreatic cancer initiation and progression. Combined with previous studies using Slc7a11 mice,[2] our Gpx4 model argues for an ambiguous implication of ferroptosis in PDAC. These contradictory ferroptotic phenotypes may reflect the fact that cell death-related inflammatory responses act as a double-edged sword in tumor immunity. In addition to causing inflammation-related immunosuppression, [3] several ferroptosis agents (e.g., RSL3) can provoke immunogenic cell death to improve cytotoxic T cell responses against tumors.[5] Similar, in addition to the chronic activation of the STING1 pathway that mediates genomic instability-induced tumorigenesis and metastasis, [6] the robust activation of the STING1 pathway by reagents (e.g., MSA-2, DMXAA, ADU-S100, and zalcitabine) or radiation therapy is an approach to enhance antitumor immunity or direct killing cancer cells in mouse models or clinical trials.[7-9] Acute activation of STING1-mediated T cell apoptosis may weaken anti-tumor immunity,[10] further arguing the dual role of STING1 in tumor therapy. Thus, it will be important to identify key DAMP mediators and to decipher the molecular mechanisms that explain reprogramming from immune activation to tolerance during tumor progression. Of note, ferroptosis occurring in different cells of TME may also be relevant in shaping tumor immunity and its failure. Thus, the lack of Gpx4 in T or B cells leads to ferroptosis and impaired immune function in mice. It may be important to develop genetic and pharmacological approaches to induced or inhibit cell death pathways including ferroptosis in specific cell types rather than in all cells present in the TME to gain a clear picture and to progress toward therapeutic interventions.
  10 in total

1.  Autophagy-dependent ferroptosis drives tumor-associated macrophage polarization via release and uptake of oncogenic KRAS protein.

Authors:  Enyong Dai; Leng Han; Jiao Liu; Yangchun Xie; Guido Kroemer; Daniel J Klionsky; Herbert J Zeh; Rui Kang; Jing Wang; Daolin Tang
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 16.016

2.  Cysteine depletion induces pancreatic tumor ferroptosis in mice.

Authors:  Michael A Badgley; Daniel M Kremer; H Carlo Maurer; Kathleen E DelGiorno; Ho-Joon Lee; Vinee Purohit; Irina R Sagalovskiy; Alice Ma; Jonathan Kapilian; Christina E M Firl; Amanda R Decker; Steve A Sastra; Carmine F Palermo; Leonardo R Andrade; Peter Sajjakulnukit; Li Zhang; Zachary P Tolstyka; Tal Hirschhorn; Candice Lamb; Tong Liu; Wei Gu; E Scott Seeley; Everett Stone; George Georgiou; Uri Manor; Alina Iuga; Geoffrey M Wahl; Brent R Stockwell; Costas A Lyssiotis; Kenneth P Olive
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Mitochondrial DNA drives abscopal responses to radiation that are inhibited by autophagy.

Authors:  Takahiro Yamazaki; Alexander Kirchmair; Ai Sato; Aitziber Buqué; Marissa Rybstein; Giulia Petroni; Norma Bloy; Francesca Finotello; Lena Stafford; Esther Navarro Manzano; Francisco Ayala de la Peña; Elena García-Martínez; Silvia C Formenti; Zlatko Trajanoski; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 25.606

4.  Mitochondrial DNA stress triggers autophagy-dependent ferroptotic death.

Authors:  Changfeng Li; Ying Zhang; Jiao Liu; Rui Kang; Daniel J Klionsky; Daolin Tang
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 16.016

5.  Ferroptosis.

Authors:  Daolin Tang; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Ferroptotic damage promotes pancreatic tumorigenesis through a TMEM173/STING-dependent DNA sensor pathway.

Authors:  Enyong Dai; Leng Han; Jiao Liu; Yangchun Xie; Herbert J Zeh; Rui Kang; Lulu Bai; Daolin Tang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Vaccination with early ferroptotic cancer cells induces efficient antitumor immunity.

Authors:  Iuliia Efimova; Elena Catanzaro; Louis Van der Meeren; Victoria D Turubanova; Hamida Hammad; Tatiana A Mishchenko; Maria V Vedunova; Carmela Fimognari; Claus Bachert; Frauke Coppieters; Steve Lefever; Andre G Skirtach; Olga Krysko; Dmitri V Krysko
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 13.751

8.  Chromosomal instability drives metastasis through a cytosolic DNA response.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Bryan Ngo; Ashley M Laughney; Julie-Ann Cavallo; Charles J Murphy; Peter Ly; Pragya Shah; Roshan K Sriram; Thomas B K Watkins; Neil K Taunk; Mercedes Duran; Chantal Pauli; Christine Shaw; Kalyani Chadalavada; Vinagolu K Rajasekhar; Giulio Genovese; Subramanian Venkatesan; Nicolai J Birkbak; Nicholas McGranahan; Mark Lundquist; Quincey LaPlant; John H Healey; Olivier Elemento; Christine H Chung; Nancy Y Lee; Marcin Imielenski; Gouri Nanjangud; Dana Pe'er; Don W Cleveland; Simon N Powell; Jan Lammerding; Charles Swanton; Lewis C Cantley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Trial watch: STING agonists in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Julie Le Naour; Laurence Zitvogel; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Erika Vacchelli; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 8.110

10.  Notch signaling protects CD4 T cells from STING-mediated apoptosis during acute systemic inflammation.

Authors:  Junke Long; Chenxuan Yang; Yawen Zheng; Patricia Loughran; Fu Guang; Yiming Li; Hong Liao; Melanie J Scott; Daolin Tang; Timothy R Billiar; Meihong Deng
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 14.136

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Is ferroptosis immunogenic? The devil is in the details!

Authors:  Oliver Kepp; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 2.  Interaction between macrophages and ferroptosis.

Authors:  Yan Yang; Yu Wang; Lin Guo; Wen Gao; Ting-Li Tang; Miao Yan
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 9.685

Review 3.  Tumor Microenvironment Features and Chemoresistance in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Insights into Targeting Physicochemical Barriers and Metabolism as Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Tiago M A Carvalho; Daria Di Molfetta; Maria Raffaella Greco; Tomas Koltai; Khalid O Alfarouk; Stephan J Reshkin; Rosa A Cardone
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Ferroptosis-related gene signature predicts the prognosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Jinyuan Shi; Pu Wu; Lei Sheng; Wei Sun; Hao Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 5.722

5.  Development and Validation of a Novel Ferroptosis-Related Gene Signature for Predicting Prognosis and the Immune Microenvironment in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Cheng Chen; Wei-Peng Chen; Zu-Ling Li; Hui Cheng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Non-apoptotic cell death-based cancer therapy: Molecular mechanism, pharmacological modulators, and nanomedicine.

Authors:  Xuan Wang; Peng Hua; Chengwei He; Meiwan Chen
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 14.903

Review 7.  The STING1 network regulates autophagy and cell death.

Authors:  Ruoxi Zhang; Rui Kang; Daolin Tang
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2021-06-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.