Literature DB >> 33489440

The prognostic factors and efficacy of induction chemotherapy in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Jianping Mao1, Wenliang Gao2, Lianguo Xue1, Lidong Zhao1, Lei Miao1, Tao Jia1, Yuanxin Zhu1, Ying Wang1, Lijuan Meng3, Juan Wang4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common form of hematological malignancy in adults. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of different treatment measures and prognostic factors for elderly patients with AML.
METHODS: The clinical data of 65 newly diagnosed elderly patients with AML were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 45 patients received induction chemotherapy including standard cytarabine regimen (n = 21) and low dose cytarabine regimen (n = 24), and 20 patients received palliative treatment. The efficacy and prognosis were compared between the groups.
RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in complete remission, overall survival and the 6-month disease-free survival rates between standard cytarabine group and low dose cytarabine group (P = 0.675, P = 0.775, P = 0.751, respectively). Significant difference in median overall survival and overall survival rate were detected (P < 0.001, P = 0.031, respectively), but no significant difference in early death rate (P = 0.238) was found between induction chemotherapy group and palliative treatment group. Multivariate analysis showed that the white blood cells count ≥ 100.0 × 109/L was associated with early death.
CONCLUSIONS: The induction chemotherapy did not increase the early mortality. The low dose cytarabine regimen can be used as the first-line choice for elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients who are not suitable for intensive chemotherapy. AJBR
Copyright © 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myeloid leukemia; elderly; prognosis; treatment

Year:  2020        PMID: 33489440      PMCID: PMC7811900     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Blood Res        ISSN: 2160-1992


  24 in total

1.  Attitude towards remission induction for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia influences survival.

Authors:  G Juliusson; R Billström; A Gruber; E Hellström-Lindberg; M Höglunds; K Karlsson; D Stockelberg; A Wahlin; M Aström; C Arnesson; U Brunell-Abrahamsson; J Carstensen; E Fredriksson; E Holmberg; K Nordenskjöld; F Wiklund
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Low-dose cytarabine, aclarubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor priming regimen versus idarubicin plus cytarabine regimen as induction therapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jie Jin; Jian Chen; Shanshan Suo; Wenbin Qian; Haitao Meng; Wenyuan Mai; Hongyan Tong; Jian Huang; Wenjuan Yu; Juyin Wei; Yinjun Lou
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2014-11-03

3.  Final results of a phase 2 trial of clofarabine and low-dose cytarabine alternating with decitabine in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Tapan M Kadia; Stefan Faderl; Farhad Ravandi; Elias Jabbour; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Gautam Borthakur; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Marina Konopleva; Jan Burger; Xuelin Huang; Xuemei Wang; Sherry Pierce; Mark Brandt; Jennie Feliu; Jorge Cortes; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: therapeutic options and choice.

Authors:  Jonathan A Webster; Keith W Pratz
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2017-06-02

5.  Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly (age 70 yr or older): long-term survivors.

Authors:  Maël Heiblig; Mohamed Elhamri; Caroline Le Jeune; Marie-Charlotte Laude; Alexandre Deloire; Eric Wattel; Gilles Salles; Xavier Thomas
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  Intensive chemotherapy does not benefit most older patients (age 70 years or older) with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Hagop Kantarjian; Farhad Ravandi; Susan O'Brien; Jorge Cortes; Stefan Faderl; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Elias Jabbour; William Wierda; Tapan Kadia; Sherry Pierce; Jianqin Shan; Michael Keating; Emil J Freireich
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes.

Authors:  James W Vardiman; Jüergen Thiele; Daniel A Arber; Richard D Brunning; Michael J Borowitz; Anna Porwit; Nancy Lee Harris; Michelle M Le Beau; Eva Hellström-Lindberg; Ayalew Tefferi; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  [Prognostic analysis of non-cytogenetic factors in elderly adults with acute myeloid leukemia].

Authors:  Bing-bing Zhao; Zheng Zhu; Peng-peng Xu; Jun-min Li; Zhi-xiang Shen; Wei-li Zhao; Li Wang
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2013-01

9.  Treatment patterns and comparative effectiveness in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients (age 70 years or older): the Lyon-university hospital experience.

Authors:  Maël Heiblig; Caroline Le Jeune; Mohamed Elhamri; Marie Balsat; Isabelle Tigaud; Adriana Plesa; Fiorenza Barraco; Hélène Labussière; Sophie Ducastelle; Franck Nicolini; Eric Wattel; Gilles Salles; Xavier Thomas
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2016-05-17

10.  Age and acute myeloid leukemia: real world data on decision to treat and outcomes from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry.

Authors:  Gunnar Juliusson; Petar Antunovic; Asa Derolf; Sören Lehmann; Lars Möllgård; Dick Stockelberg; Ulf Tidefelt; Anders Wahlin; Martin Höglund
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.