Irma Eloff1, Marien Graham2. 1. Department of Educational Psychology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa. 2. Department of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increased investment in optimal student mental health and well-being has been noted by universities around the world. Studies show the need for contextually relevant, granular understandings of specific aspects of student mental health and well-being. METHODS: A survey was conducted at two time points - at the beginning and end of the academic year - at a large, urban university in South Africa. The Mental Health Continuum-Short Form, the Flourishing Scale, and the Fragility of Happiness Scale were used in the testing of undergraduate students from a variety of scientific disciplines. Two separate comparisons were made, based on the baseline data (n = 551) and the follow-up data (n = 281). In Comparison 1 (baseline, n = 443; follow-up, n = 173), two independent, biographically (very) similar groups were compared. Comparison 2 (n = 108) compared the results from the baseline and follow-up of the same group of students who completed the instruments at both time points. RESULTS: Results indicate a significant decline in mental health and well-being for both groups (independent and dependent) over the course of the academic year. Both follow-up groups were found to have lower psychological, emotional and social well-being, psychological flourishing, and reduced mental health, in comparison with the baseline groups. CONCLUSIONS: The statistically significant decreases in the mental health and well-being of participants in this study indicate the need for substantive interventions to support student mental health and well-being. Strong foci for well-being interventions should include self-efficacy, sense of direction, meaning and creating a sense of belonging.
BACKGROUND: Increased investment in optimal student mental health and well-being has been noted by universities around the world. Studies show the need for contextually relevant, granular understandings of specific aspects of student mental health and well-being. METHODS: A survey was conducted at two time points - at the beginning and end of the academic year - at a large, urban university in South Africa. The Mental Health Continuum-Short Form, the Flourishing Scale, and the Fragility of Happiness Scale were used in the testing of undergraduate students from a variety of scientific disciplines. Two separate comparisons were made, based on the baseline data (n = 551) and the follow-up data (n = 281). In Comparison 1 (baseline, n = 443; follow-up, n = 173), two independent, biographically (very) similar groups were compared. Comparison 2 (n = 108) compared the results from the baseline and follow-up of the same group of students who completed the instruments at both time points. RESULTS: Results indicate a significant decline in mental health and well-being for both groups (independent and dependent) over the course of the academic year. Both follow-up groups were found to have lower psychological, emotional and social well-being, psychological flourishing, and reduced mental health, in comparison with the baseline groups. CONCLUSIONS: The statistically significant decreases in the mental health and well-being of participants in this study indicate the need for substantive interventions to support student mental health and well-being. Strong foci for well-being interventions should include self-efficacy, sense of direction, meaning and creating a sense of belonging.
Authors: Corey L M Keyes; Marié Wissing; Johan P Potgieter; Michael Temane; Annamarie Kruger; Sinette van Rooy Journal: Clin Psychol Psychother Date: 2008 May-Jun
Authors: Randy P Auerbach; Philippe Mortier; Ronny Bruffaerts; Jordi Alonso; Corina Benjet; Pim Cuijpers; Koen Demyttenaere; David D Ebert; Jennifer Greif Green; Penelope Hasking; Elaine Murray; Matthew K Nock; Stephanie Pinder-Amaker; Nancy A Sampson; Dan J Stein; Gemma Vilagut; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ronald C Kessler Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2018-09-13
Authors: R P Auerbach; J Alonso; W G Axinn; P Cuijpers; D D Ebert; J G Green; I Hwang; R C Kessler; H Liu; P Mortier; M K Nock; S Pinder-Amaker; N A Sampson; S Aguilar-Gaxiola; A Al-Hamzawi; L H Andrade; C Benjet; J M Caldas-de-Almeida; K Demyttenaere; S Florescu; G de Girolamo; O Gureje; J M Haro; E G Karam; A Kiejna; V Kovess-Masfety; S Lee; J J McGrath; S O'Neill; B-E Pennell; K Scott; M Ten Have; Y Torres; A M Zaslavsky; Z Zarkov; R Bruffaerts Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Marijke Schotanus-Dijkstra; Margreet Ten Have; Sanne M A Lamers; Ron de Graaf; Ernst T Bohlmeijer Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Mehnaz Nuruddin Gitay; Sarah Fatima; Shahama Arshad; Basmah Arshad; Ahsan Ehtesham; Muhammad Ameen Baig; Muhammad Furqan Ilyas; Shaad Farhat Rizvi; Qadeer Farooqui; Muhammad Masroor; Zeba Haque Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2018-08-25
Authors: Jason Bantjes; Christine Lochner; Wylene Saal; Janine Roos; Lian Taljaard; Daniel Page; Randy P Auerbach; Philippe Mortier; Ronny Bruffaerts; Ronald C Kessler; Dan J Stein Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 3.295