Literature DB >> 33489175

Early surgical aortic bioprosthesis failure caused by cusp tear: A word of caution.

Thibault Schaeffer1, Denis Berdajs1, Oliver Reuthebuch1.   

Abstract

Cusp tear is an increasingly described mode of failure of the Trifecta aortic bioprosthesis. Acute aortic regurgitation after implantation of a Trifecta in absence of endocarditis should suggest a cusp tear and be promptly treated with redo surgery.
© 2020 The Authors. Clinical Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Trifecta; aortic valve replacement; cusp tear; early structural valve degeneration

Year:  2020        PMID: 33489175      PMCID: PMC7813062          DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.3516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Case Rep        ISSN: 2050-0904


INTRODUCTION

Among the bioprostheses available for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), the Trifecta valve (Abbott Laboratories) is a stented bioprosthesis with externally mounted bovine pericardial leaflets, renowned for its excellent hemodynamic properties. Midterm as well as recent long‐term studies report a low incidence of structural valve deterioration (SVD). , However, only recently, we have experienced two cases of acute and severe regurgitation due to cusp tear, 12 and 18 months after initial implantation, respectively. A critical literature research has shown similar current reports. With this depiction, we want to add on a thorough and decisive reconsideration of the valve's features.

CASES PRESENTATION

Case n°1

A 69‐year‐old male patient underwent a combined procedure with SAVR using a 23 mm second‐generation Trifecta and mitral annuloplasty, due to severe calcified aortic stenosis and severe mitral prolapse. The procedure was performed in our hospital. Postoperative echocardiography showed neither para‐ nor intraprosthetic leak and the mean aortic transvalvular gradient was 12 mm Hg. Eighteen months later, the patient presented to his general practitioner complaining of sudden onset of dyspnea and cough. An empirical antibiotic treatment was initiated as treatment of a presumed pneumonia. Due to worsening of symptoms, the patient was admitted to the regional hospital. Cardiac examination including transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) revealed a severe aortic regurgitation with a floating structure on the noncoronary cusp (Figure 1; Videos S1, Video S2, and Video S3). An infection of the prosthesis was suspected, and the patient was referred to our institution for surgical treatment. Despite negative blood cultures, the decision for urgent redo aortic valve replacement was taken based on a persistent pulmonary edema. The surgical inspection of the Trifecta valve revealed a complete rupture between the noncoronary cusp and the stent along its attachment to the adjacent left cusp (Figure 2). The prosthesis was well seated, and there were no signs of endocarditis. A 23 mm Perimount Magna Ease (Edwards Lifesciences) was alternatively implanted. The intervention was uneventful. The postoperative course was marked by the onset of a ventricular fibrillation on the fourth day, presumably due to a prior nondiagnosed long QT syndrome, for which the patient was successfully resuscitated and an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator was subsequently implanted. The patient was discharged from hospital after 2 weeks without further complications. Microbiologic analyses of the prosthesis including a eubacterial polymerase chain reaction as well as Q fever, Brucella and Bartonella serology remained negative.
FIGURE 1

Case n°1: A, transesophageal echocardiography 3‐chamber view with a floating structure on the ventricular side from the noncoronary cusp during diastole (yellow arrow). B, severe aortic regurgitation with eccentric jet visible with color Doppler

FIGURE 2

Case n°1: A, explanted prosthesis (Trifecta 25 mm). B, cusp tear (arrow) along the commissure causing the prolapse

Case n°1: A, transesophageal echocardiography 3‐chamber view with a floating structure on the ventricular side from the noncoronary cusp during diastole (yellow arrow). B, severe aortic regurgitation with eccentric jet visible with color Doppler Case n°1: A, explanted prosthesis (Trifecta 25 mm). B, cusp tear (arrow) along the commissure causing the prolapse

Case n°2

A 58‐year‐old male patient underwent aortic valve replacement with a 27 mm second‐generation Trifecta due to a severe stenotic, bicuspid aortic valve in our hospital. The decision to implant a bioprosthesis had been influenced by the patient's reluctance to a lifelong anticoagulation. Postoperative echocardiography showed neither para‐ nor intraprosthetic leak and the mean aortic transvalvular gradient was 6 mm Hg. Twelve months later, the patient was urgently admitted to his regional hospital due to the sudden onset of chest pain. A computed tomography ruled out a pulmonary embolism. The patient was further referred to our institution, where a complete cardiac examination including TEE demonstrated a severe aortic regurgitation due to a complete cusp prolapse, presumably on the noncoronary side (Figure 3; Videos S4 and Video S5). The patient denied fever. Blood cultures were negative. The decision was taken in our heart team to perform a valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) into the faulty Trifecta prosthesis via a transfemoral approach. However, the TAVI implantation (Portico 29 mm, Abbott) failed, with an ultimate migration of the device into the proximal aorta. An urgent sternotomy was performed, and the TAVI‐prosthesis was extracted under cardiopulmonary bypass. The surgical examination of the Trifecta confirmed the tear of the noncoronary cusp along the commissure adjacent to the right cusp (Figure 4). There were no signs of infection. A 25 mm Inspiris Resilia (Edwards Lifesciences) was implanted. The procedure was uneventful. The patient was discharged on the sixth postoperative day. Microbiologic analyses revealed a single colony‐building unit of Propionibacterium acnes, which was interpreted as a contamination by our infectious disease specialists.
FIGURE 3

Case n°2: transesophageal echocardiography short‐axis view through the aortic valve showing severe aortic regurgitation due to complete prolapse, presumably of the noncoronary cusp; with and without color Doppler (left and right, respectively)

FIGURE 4

Case n°2: A, intraoperative view of the destructed Trifecta (arrow). B, explanted prosthesis (Trifecta 27 mm). The arrow marks the initial tear between the cusp and the stent along the commissure. The tear marked with * was due to the explantation of the prosthesis

Case n°2: transesophageal echocardiography short‐axis view through the aortic valve showing severe aortic regurgitation due to complete prolapse, presumably of the noncoronary cusp; with and without color Doppler (left and right, respectively) Case n°2: A, intraoperative view of the destructed Trifecta (arrow). B, explanted prosthesis (Trifecta 27 mm). The arrow marks the initial tear between the cusp and the stent along the commissure. The tear marked with * was due to the explantation of the prosthesis

DISCUSSION

Since its release on the market in 2011, the Trifecta has aroused interest for SAVR due to its excellent dynamic performance. Regarding its durability, a recent cohort study involving 1241 patients reported a freedom from reoperation due to SVD of 93.3% at 8 years. The precise SVD mechanisms were not specified. A thorough review of the literature between 2014 and 2020 reveals 15 cases among 11 publications of parastent cusp tear as a cause of acute aortic regurgitation after implantation of a Trifecta valve, for which urgent redo surgery was mandatory. , , , , , , , , , , In all cases, neither extrinsic damage nor evidence of endocarditis could explain the cusp tear. Table 1 lists the reported cases with relevant clinical and operative details. Based on the data provided by these reports, the median time was 43 months (range 8‐72 months) between the implantation of the valve and the occurrence of the cusp tear (ie, durability).
TABLE 1

Trifecta failure cases due to cusp tear reported in the lit

Case n°AuthorsDate

Age

(years)

Gender

Valve

Size (mm)

Clinical presentation

Durability

(months)

Tear localization

Other pathologic

findings

TherapyBlood culturesExplant culture
1Campisi & al.201474M23Left ventricular heart failure8Between left & noncoronaryNDSAVR w/CEPME 23 mmNDNegative
2Piñón & al.201471F21Pulmonary congestion34NoncoronaryNDSAVR w/St Jude Epic 21 mmNegativeNegative
3Yoshida & al.201677FNDDyspnea on exertion19Between right & noncoronaryNDSAVR w/CEPMENegativeND
4Zhu & al.201776M23Left ventricular heart failure33Between left & noncoronaryNDSAVR w/CEPME 23 mmNegativeND
5Schaefer & al.201783M23Cardiogenic shock72NDNDSAVRNDND
6Hamamoto & al.201776F21Pulmonary congestion24Right coronaryCircumferential pannus ingrowth on the inflow sideSAVR w/porcine bioprosthesisNDNegative
7Tamura & al.201777M23Dyspnea on exertion31Left coronaryNDSAVRNDND
8Eichinger & al.201873F21Severe, acute dyspnea43NoncoronaryNDSAVR w/bovine bioprosthesis 21 mmNDNegative
9Eichinger & al.201866F23Pulmonary congestion51Right coronaryNDSAVR w/bovine bioprosthesis 21 mmNDNegative
10Chengalath & al.201856M23Severe aortic regurgitation44Between left & right coronaryNDSAVRNDND
11Hara & al.201969M23Dyspnea48Left coronary ND SAVR w/CEPME 23 mmNDND
12Kaneyuki & al.202064F21Dyspnea on exertion72NoncoronaryPannus formationSAVR w/bovine bioprosthesis 21 mmNDND
13Kaneyuki & al.202071F19Dyspnea on exertion71NoncoronaryPannus formationSAVR w/bovine bioprosthesis 19 mmNDND
14Kaneyuki & al.202068M21Dyspnea on exertion56NoncoronaryPannus formationSAVR w/bovine bioprosthesis 21 mmNDND
15Kaneyuki & al.202073M21Dyspnea on exertion37NoncoronaryNDSAVR w/bovine bioprosthesis 21 mmNDND

Abbreviation: CEPME, carpentier‐edwards perimount magna ease; ND, not documented, SAVR, surgical aortic valve replacement.

Trifecta failure cases due to cusp tear reported in the lit Age (years) Valve Size (mm) Durability (months) Other pathologic findings Abbreviation: CEPME, carpentier‐edwards perimount magna ease; ND, not documented, SAVR, surgical aortic valve replacement. In 2017, Goldmann & al. also reported one case of pure regurgitation due to noncalcified leaflet tear as a cause of explantation in a prospective, nonrandomized observational study involving 710 patients. In 2019, Fukuhara & al. demonstrated a 13.3% incidence of SVD at 7 years in a retrospective comparative study involving 1058 patients after bioprosthetic SAVR in the Trifecta group (n = 508). Among the explanted failed prostheses, the authors reported seven cases of pure regurgitation, the mechanism of which being a cusp tear. Also in 2019, Kilic & al. reported three cases out of 1953 implantations of early failed Trifecta due to cusp tear. Our two present cases add up to the aforementioned with an unfavorably early occurrence. The exact mechanism of the tear remains unclear. We did not notice any significant amount of calcification, pannus, or any signs of endocarditis, neither macroscopically nor with microbiological analysis, as an explanation for prosthesis failure. We assume, these tears resulted from mechanical fatigue of the cusp tissue at its fulcrum on the stent post, where mechanical stress is notoriously high. Cusp tear is a well‐documented issue of externally mounted leaflets bioprostheses from previous generations, described after explantation of both Ionescu‐Shiley, Hancock I, and first‐generation Mitroflow (A11) valves. , , Recent in vitro works suggest the specificity of cusp tear secondary to mechanical abrasion at the commissural region in externally mounted leaflets valves. Besides, fixation as well as anticalcification treatment differ between manufacturers and may affect the valve durability. Whether their ethanol‐based anti‐calcification treatment weakens the Trifecta's leaflets overtime, remains hypothetical. An announcement was made to the Swiss national surveillance organization for implanted medical devices (Swissmedic). Due to our current experience and the latest adverse reports, we have decided to discontinue the implantation of the Trifecta bioprosthesis.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors report no conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

TS: wrote the manuscript. DB: performed the surgical procedure (Case n°1). OR: performed the surgical procedure (Case n°2) and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

Written informed consent for publication was obtained from both patients. Video S1 Click here for additional data file. Video S2 Click here for additional data file. Video S3 Click here for additional data file. Video S4 Click here for additional data file. Video S5 Click here for additional data file.
  21 in total

1.  Trifecta Aortic Bioprosthesis: Midterm Results in 1,953 Patients From a Single Center.

Authors:  Arman Kilic; Ibrahim Sultan; Forozan Navid; Edgar Aranda-Michel; Danny Chu; Floyd Thoma; Thomas G Gleason
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Leaflet Tear of Trifecta Bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Masanori Hara; Muneyasu Kawasaki; Keiichi Tokuhiro; Toru Kameda; Yoshio Nunoi; Yoshinori Watanabe
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.975

3.  Early Failure of Trifecta Bioprosthesis in the Aortic Position.

Authors:  Kazufumi Yoshida; Naoto Fukunaga; Yoshito Sakon; Tadaaki Koyama
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 1.620

4.  Laboratory assessment of the design, function, and durability of pericardial bioprostheses.

Authors:  J Fisher; I J Reece; G R Jack; L Cathcart; D J Wheatley
Journal:  Eng Med       Date:  1987-04

Review 5.  Pure Cusp Tear of Trifecta Bioprosthesis 2 Years after Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Masaki Hamamoto; Taira Kobayashi; Masamichi Ozawa; Kosuke Yoshimura
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 1.520

6.  Is Commissural region tear an Achilles' heel of the Trifecta aortic bioprosthesis?

Authors:  Manoras Mathew Chengalath; Bhaskar Ranganathan; Jose Chacko Periappuram
Journal:  Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann       Date:  2017-11-28

7.  Cusp Tear of Trifecta™ Aortic Bioprosthesis Resulting in Acute Heart Failure.

Authors:  Anne-Kristin Schaefer; Alfred Kocher; Günther Laufer; Dominik Wiedemann
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2017-09

8.  Durability and clinical experience using a bovine pericardial prosthetic aortic valve.

Authors:  Sven Lehmann; Khalil Jawad; Maja T Dieterlen; Alexandro Hoyer; Jens Garbade; Piroze Davierwala; Michael A Borger
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Pathologic evaluation of 28 Mitroflow pericardial valves: a 12-year experience.

Authors:  Adriana Luk; Robert J Cusimano; Jagdish Butany
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  The St Jude Medical Trifecta aortic pericardial valve: results from a global, multicenter, prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Joseph E Bavaria; Nimesh D Desai; Anson Cheung; Michael R Petracek; Mark A Groh; Michael A Borger; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of postoperative patient-prosthesis mismatch as a risk factor for early structural valve deterioration after aortic valve replacement with Trifecta bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Tatsuto Wakami; Shigeki Koizumi; Tadaaki Koyama
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.522

2.  Modes of failure of Trifecta aortic valve prosthesis.

Authors:  Pietro Giorgio Malvindi; Hassan Kattach; Suvitesh Luthra; Sunil Ohri
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-07-09

3.  Trifecta versus Perimount Magna Ease aortic valves: Failure mechanisms.

Authors:  Ryo Suzuki; Toshiro Ito; Masato Suzuki; Shunsuke Ohori; Ryo Takayanagi; Shiro Miura
Journal:  Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann       Date:  2022-05-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.