Literature DB >> 33489074

A Geometrical Account to Explain the Fat-Face Illusion.

Amit Rawal1, Philip Tseng1,2,3.   

Abstract

Investigations of the "fat-face" illusion have unanimously agreed that the illusion is face-specific. Here, we offer several manipulations to highlight that the fat-face illusion is not restricted to the bottom image, isn't a property of internal features, facial contour/texture, and in general isn't even specific to faces. We propose the axis of horizontal asymmetry account to contextualize fat-face illusion as a geometry-led illusion.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  face perception; frames of reference; shape; shapes/objects

Year:  2020        PMID: 33489074      PMCID: PMC7768859          DOI: 10.1177/2041669520981094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iperception        ISSN: 2041-6695


  5 in total

1.  Face contour is crucial to the fat face illusion.

Authors:  Yu-Hao Sun; Paul C Quinn; Zhe Wang; Huimin Shi; Ming Zhong; Haiyang Jin; Liezhong Ge; Olivier Pascalis; James W Tanaka; Kang Lee
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  "Top-down" effects where none should be found: the El Greco fallacy in perception research.

Authors:  Chaz Firestone; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-02

3.  A new "fat face" illusion.

Authors:  Yu-Hao Sun; Liezhong Ge; Paul C Quinn; Zhe Wang; Naiqi G Xiao; Olivier Pascalis; James Tanaka; Kang Lee
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Fat Face Illusion, or Jastrow Illusion with Faces, in Humans but not in Chimpanzees.

Authors:  Masaki Tomonaga
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2015-12-14

5.  Why do most faces look thinner upside down?

Authors:  Peter Thompson; Jennie Wilson
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-10-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.