Elias Heino1, Noora Ellonen2, Riittakerttu Kaltiala1,3,4. 1. Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland. 2. Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland. 3. Department of Adolescent Psychiatry, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. 4. Vanha Vaasa Hospital, Vaasa, Finland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During adolescence, bullying often has a sexual content. Involvement in bullying as a bully, victim or both has been associated with a range of negative health outcomes. Transgender youth appear to face elevated rates of bullying in comparison to their mainstream peers. However, the involvement of transgender youth as perpetrators of bullying remains unclear in the recent literature. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare involvement in bullying between transgender and mainstream youth and among middle and late adolescents in a general population sample. METHODS: Our study included 139,829 students in total, divided between a comprehensive school and an upper secondary education sample. Associations between gender identity and involvement in bullying were first studied using cross-tabulations with chi-square statistics. Logistic regression was used to study multivariate associations. Gender identity was used as the independent variable, with cisgender as the reference category. Subjection to and perpetration of bullying were entered each in turn as the dependent variable. Demographic factors, family characteristics, internalizing symptoms, externalizing behaviors, and involvement in bullying in the other role were added as confounding factors. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) are given. The limit for statistical significance was set at p < 0.001. RESULTS: Both experiences of being bullied and perpetrating bullying were more commonly reported by transgender youth than by cisgender youth. Among transgender youth, all involvement in bullying was more commonly reported by non-binary youth than those identifying with the opposite sex. Logistic regression revealed that non-binary identity was most strongly associated with involvement in bullying, followed by opposite sex identity and cisgender identity. Transgender identities were also more strongly associated with perpetration of bullying than subjection to bullying. CONCLUSION: Transgender identity, especially non-binary identity, is associated with both being bullied and perpetrating bullying even when a range of variables including internal stress and involvement in bullying in the opposite role are taken into account. This suggests that bullying during adolescence may serve as a mechanism of maintaining heteronormativity.
BACKGROUND: During adolescence, bullying often has a sexual content. Involvement in bullying as a bully, victim or both has been associated with a range of negative health outcomes. Transgender youth appear to face elevated rates of bullying in comparison to their mainstream peers. However, the involvement of transgender youth as perpetrators of bullying remains unclear in the recent literature. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare involvement in bullying between transgender and mainstream youth and among middle and late adolescents in a general population sample. METHODS: Our study included 139,829 students in total, divided between a comprehensive school and an upper secondary education sample. Associations between gender identity and involvement in bullying were first studied using cross-tabulations with chi-square statistics. Logistic regression was used to study multivariate associations. Gender identity was used as the independent variable, with cisgender as the reference category. Subjection to and perpetration of bullying were entered each in turn as the dependent variable. Demographic factors, family characteristics, internalizing symptoms, externalizing behaviors, and involvement in bullying in the other role were added as confounding factors. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) are given. The limit for statistical significance was set at p < 0.001. RESULTS: Both experiences of being bullied and perpetrating bullying were more commonly reported by transgender youth than by cisgender youth. Among transgender youth, all involvement in bullying was more commonly reported by non-binary youth than those identifying with the opposite sex. Logistic regression revealed that non-binary identity was most strongly associated with involvement in bullying, followed by opposite sex identity and cisgender identity. Transgender identities were also more strongly associated with perpetration of bullying than subjection to bullying. CONCLUSION: Transgender identity, especially non-binary identity, is associated with both being bullied and perpetrating bullying even when a range of variables including internal stress and involvement in bullying in the opposite role are taken into account. This suggests that bullying during adolescence may serve as a mechanism of maintaining heteronormativity.
Authors: Kati Tiirikainen; Henna Haravuori; Klaus Ranta; Riittakerttu Kaltiala-Heino; Mauri Marttunen Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Marla E Eisenberg; Amy L Gower; Barbara J McMorris; G Nicole Rider; Glynis Shea; Eli Coleman Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Mark S Friedman; Michael P Marshal; Thomas E Guadamuz; Chongyi Wei; Carolyn F Wong; Elizabeth Saewyc; Ron Stall Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Sari L Reisner; Kerith J Conron; Laura Anatale Tardiff; Stephanie Jarvi; Allegra R Gordon; S Bryn Austin Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jesús Esteban Mora; Francisco Manuel Morales Rodríguez; Juan Pedro Martínez Ramón Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Zypher Jude G Regencia; Aisia V Castelo; Patrick C Eustaquio; Yanyan S Araña; John Oliver L Corciega; John Danvic T Rosadiño; Ronivin G Pagtakhan; Emmanuel S Baja Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 4.135