Jie En Lim1, Wei Teen Wong2, Tuan Ann Teh3, Soon Huat Lim3, John Carson Allen4, Joanne Hui Min Quah5,6, Rahul Malhotra7,8, Ngiap Chuan Tan1,5,6. 1. Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. 2. SingHealth Polyclinics-Outram, SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore. 3. Technology Development Centre, Institute of Technical Education College West, Singapore, Singapore. 4. Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. 5. Head Office, SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore. 6. SingHealth Duke-NUS Family Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. 7. Centre for Ageing Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. 8. Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
Introduction: Dementia is increasing in prevalence in aging populations. Current questionnaire-based cognitive assessments may not comprehensively assess cognitive function and real-time task-performance. Virtual reality (VR) technology has been used in cognitive assessments but existing systems have limited scope in evaluating all cognitive domains. We have developed a novel, fully-immersive VR system (CAVIRE: Cognitive Assessment by VIrtual REality), which incorporates automated audio-visual instructions. An automated scoring matrix to assess the six cognitive domains-perceptual-motor function, executive function, complex attention, social cognition, learning and memory, and language-is embedded in the CAVIRE system. Aims: The primary aim is to evaluate the feasibility of using the CAVIRE system to assess cognitive function of participants across different age groups from 35 to 84 years old. The secondary aims are to determine the CAVIRE performance-indices (completion time and scores) of the participants and to assess their acceptability toward the use of CAVIRE as a modality for cognitive assessment. Methods: One hundred and seventy-five participants will be assessed by CAVIRE at a primary care clinic in Singapore. They will be first assessed using questionnaires: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADLs), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs). Those aged 65-84 years will be grouped into cognitively intact (n = 50, MoCA score ≥ 26) and cognitively impaired (n = 50, MoCA < 26). The CAVIRE performance-indices of cognitively healthy younger participants aged 35-64 years (n = 75) will serve as benchmark references. CAVIRE auto-computes the participant's performance-indices in 13 different segments. The tasks include domestic chores, memory, shopping, and social interactions. The proportion of participants who complete the entire VR assessment in each age group will be evaluated as feasibility indicators. The CAVIRE performance-indices will be compared across the different age groups. Feedback on the acceptability of the CAVIRE system will be collated and compared among the participants across the age groups. Significance: CAVIRE is designed to assess the six domains of cognitive function using VR. The results of this feasibility study will provide insights for the implementation of the CAVIRE system as an alternative modality of cognitive assessment in the community.
Introduction: Dementia is increasing in prevalence in aging populations. Current questionnaire-based cognitive assessments may not comprehensively assess cognitive function and real-time task-performance. Virtual reality (VR) technology has been used in cognitive assessments but existing systems have limited scope in evaluating all cognitive domains. We have developed a novel, fully-immersive VR system (CAVIRE: Cognitive Assessment by VIrtual REality), which incorporates automated audio-visual instructions. An automated scoring matrix to assess the six cognitive domains-perceptual-motor function, executive function, complex attention, social cognition, learning and memory, and language-is embedded in the CAVIRE system. Aims: The primary aim is to evaluate the feasibility of using the CAVIRE system to assess cognitive function of participants across different age groups from 35 to 84 years old. The secondary aims are to determine the CAVIRE performance-indices (completion time and scores) of the participants and to assess their acceptability toward the use of CAVIRE as a modality for cognitive assessment. Methods: One hundred and seventy-five participants will be assessed by CAVIRE at a primary care clinic in Singapore. They will be first assessed using questionnaires: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADLs), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs). Those aged 65-84 years will be grouped into cognitively intact (n = 50, MoCA score ≥ 26) and cognitively impaired (n = 50, MoCA < 26). The CAVIRE performance-indices of cognitively healthy younger participants aged 35-64 years (n = 75) will serve as benchmark references. CAVIRE auto-computes the participant's performance-indices in 13 different segments. The tasks include domestic chores, memory, shopping, and social interactions. The proportion of participants who complete the entire VR assessment in each age group will be evaluated as feasibility indicators. The CAVIRE performance-indices will be compared across the different age groups. Feedback on the acceptability of the CAVIRE system will be collated and compared among the participants across the age groups. Significance: CAVIRE is designed to assess the six domains of cognitive function using VR. The results of this feasibility study will provide insights for the implementation of the CAVIRE system as an alternative modality of cognitive assessment in the community.
Authors: Michelle Brasure; Priyanka Desai; Heather Davila; Victoria A Nelson; Collin Calvert; Eric Jutkowitz; Mary Butler; Howard A Fink; Edward Ratner; Laura S Hemmy; J Riley McCarten; Terry R Barclay; Robert L Kane Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: An-Wen Chan; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman; Andreas Laupacis; Peter C Gøtzsche; Karmela Krleža-Jerić; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Howard Mann; Kay Dickersin; Jesse A Berlin; Caroline J Doré; Wendy R Parulekar; William S M Summerskill; Trish Groves; Kenneth F Schulz; Harold C Sox; Frank W Rockhold; Drummond Rennie; David Moher Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jee Wook Kim; Dong Young Lee; Eun Hyun Seo; Bo Kyung Sohn; Young Min Choe; Shin Gyeom Kim; Shin Young Park; Il Han Choo; Jong Chul Youn; Jin Hyeong Jhoo; Ki Woong Kim; Jong Inn Woo Journal: Psychiatry Investig Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 2.505
Authors: Grégory Lecouvey; Alexandrine Morand; Julie Gonneaud; Pascale Piolino; Eric Orriols; Alice Pélerin; Laurence Ferreira Da Silva; Vincent de La Sayette; Francis Eustache; Béatrice Desgranges Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2019-02-12
Authors: Sean Ing Loon Chua; Ngiap Chuan Tan; Wei Teen Wong; John Carson Allen; Joanne Hui Min Quah; Rahul Malhotra; Truls Østbye Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Ngiap Chuan Tan; Jie En Lim; John Carson Allen; Wei Teen Wong; Joanne Hui Min Quah; Paulpandi Muthulakshmi; Tuan Ann Teh; Soon Huat Lim; Rahul Malhotra Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-03-11