Literature DB >> 33488285

Chromosomal copy number analysis of products of conception by conventional karyotyping and next-generation sequencing.

Yuki Tamura1, Mitsuo Santo1, Yasuhisa Araki1,2, Hidehiko Matsubayashi3,4, Yukiko Takaya3, Kotaro Kitaya3, Masakazu Doshida4, Kohei Yamaguchi4, Shimpei Mizuta3,4, Chie Takahashi4, Namhyo Kim3, Koichiro Okuno3, Takumi Takeuchi4, Tomomoto Ishikawa3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chromosomal abnormalities are a major cause of spontaneous abortion, and conventional G-banded karyotyping (G-banding) is mainly utilized for chromosomal analysis. Recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been introduced for chromosomal analysis. Here, we aimed to investigate the applicability and utility of NGS-based chromosomal analysis of products of conception (POC) on chorionic villus samples from spontaneous abortion.
METHODS: The results of chromosomal analysis of 7 chorionic villus samples from spontaneous abortion were compared between conventional G-banding and NGS-based chromosomal copy number analysis. Age dependency and frequency of each chromosomal aneuploidy were evaluated for 279 cases analyzed by NGS.
RESULTS: Excluding two cases (culture failure and maternal cell contamination), the results were consistent between G-banding and NGS. For cases analyzed by NGS, the rate of chromosomal abnormality increased in a maternal age-dependent manner. The frequency of each chromosomal aneuploidy detected by NGS was almost the same as that previously reported. Finally, NGS analysis was possible for difficult cases by G-banding analysis, such as culture failure, maternal cell contamination, long-term storage cases, and low cell number.
CONCLUSIONS: Chromosome analysis using NGS not only obtains comparable results to conventional G-banding, but also can analyze POC more accurately and efficiently.
© 2020 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chorionic villus; karyotyping; next‐generation sequencing; products of conception; spontaneous abortion

Year:  2020        PMID: 33488285      PMCID: PMC7812460          DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Med Biol        ISSN: 1445-5781


  9 in total

Review 1.  PGDIS Position Statement on the Transfer of Mosaic Embryos 2019.

Authors:  D S Cram; D Leigh; A Handyside; L Rechitsky; K Xu; G Harton; J Grifo; C Rubio; E Fragouli; S Kahraman; E Forman; M Katz-Jaffe; H Tempest; A Thornhill; C Strom; T Escudero; J Qiao; S Munne; J L Simpson; A Kuliev
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Overview of Chromosome Abnormalities in First Trimester Miscarriages: A Series of 1,011 Consecutive Chorionic Villi Sample Karyotypes.

Authors:  Anna Soler; Carme Morales; Irene Mademont-Soler; Ester Margarit; Antoni Borrell; Virginia Borobio; Miriam Muñoz; Aurora Sánchez
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 1.636

3.  Recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patients.

Authors:  F Popescu; C R Jaslow; W H Kutteh
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Chromosomal karyotype in chorionic villi of recurrent spontaneous abortion patients.

Authors:  Yan Du; Lanting Chen; Jing Lin; Jun Zhu; Na Zhang; Xuemin Qiu; Dajin Li; Ling Wang
Journal:  Biosci Trends       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.400

5.  Comparison of cytogenetics and molecular karyotyping for chromosome testing of miscarriage specimens.

Authors:  Meera Sridhar Shah; Cengiz Cinnioglu; Melissa Maisenbacher; Ioanna Comstock; Jonathan Kort; Ruth Bunker Lathi
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Reliability of 46,XX results on miscarriage specimens: a review of 1,222 first-trimester miscarriage specimens.

Authors:  Ruth B Lathi; Stephanie L F Gustin; Jennifer Keller; Melissa K Maisenbacher; Styrmir Sigurjonsson; Rosina Tao; Zach Demko
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Additional information from chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) over conventional karyotyping when diagnosing chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R K Dhillon; S C Hillman; R K Morris; D McMullan; D Williams; A Coomarasamy; M D Kilby
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Chromosomal copy number variations in products of conception from spontaneous abortion by next-generation sequencing technology.

Authors:  Rulin Dai; Qi Xi; Ruixue Wang; Hongguo Zhang; Yuting Jiang; Leilei Li; Ruizhi Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Chromosomal copy number analysis on chorionic villus samples from early spontaneous miscarriages by high throughput genetic technology.

Authors:  Jiandong Shen; Wei Wu; Chao Gao; Humphrey Ochin; Dianyun Qu; Jiazi Xie; Li Gao; Yadong Zhou; Yugui Cui; Jiayin Liu
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.009

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)-a single-center experience.

Authors:  Jiny Nair; Sachin Shetty; Cynthia Irene Kasi; Nirmala Thondehalmath; Deepanjali Ganesh; Vidyalakshmi R Bhat; Sajana Mannadia; Anjana Ranganath; Rajsekhar Nayak; Devika Gunasheela; Swathi Shetty
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Usefulness of combined NGS and QF-PCR analysis for product of conception karyotyping.

Authors:  Takema Kato; Shunsuke Miyai; Hideki Suzuki; Yuuri Murase; Shiyo Ota; Hiroko Yamauchi; Michiko Ammae; Tatsuya Nakano; Yoshiharu Nakaoka; Tomoko Inoue; Yoshiharu Morimoto; Aisaku Fukuda; Takafumi Utsunomiya; Haruki Nishizawa; Hiroki Kurahashi
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2022-02-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.