| Literature DB >> 33488181 |
Akbar Mohammadi1, Jafarsadegh Moghaddas1.
Abstract
The aim of this work was to prepare biodegradable starch aerogels as drug carriers. The effective parameters in the synthesis and the optimal values of these parameters were determined using Minitab experimental design software. Ibuprofen was selected as a model drug for the dissolution study and loaded into optimized aerogel during the last solvent exchange step. The Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis showed that ibuprofen has been successfully loaded into the aerogel matrix without any effect on the aerogel nature. The drug loading was calculated to be 29%. The isotherm of ibuprofen adsorption into aerogels matrices followed from the Freundlich isotherm. The in vitro release tests of crystalline ibuprofen and ibuprofen-loaded potato starch aerogel were investigated with simulated gastric and intestinal fluids in USP 2 apparatus. It was shown that the dissolution rate of ibuprofen could be dramatically changed. Also, an improvement in the dissolution rate of ibuprofen was achieved by performing the dissolution test first in the gastric medium for 120 min and then in the intestinal medium for up to 270 min. A higher release rate (100%) was observed at the end of the in vitro experiment.Entities:
Keywords: Adsorption isotherm; drug release; ibuprofen; optimization; potato starch aerogel; supercritical CO2
Year: 2020 PMID: 33488181 PMCID: PMC7671223 DOI: 10.3906/kim-1912-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Turk J Chem ISSN: 1300-0527 Impact factor: 1.239
Experiments predicted by Minitab experimental design.
| tR(day> | w/w% Starch (x) | tS.E (h) | Blocks (TR) | PtType | RunOrder | StdOrder | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | ||
| 10 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | ||
| 14 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | ||
| 14 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | ||
| 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | ||
| 6 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 2 | ||
| 10 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 10 | ||
| 14 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 8 | ||
| 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | ||
| 10 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 11 | ||
| 14 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 4 | ||
| 16 | 12 | 2 | --1 | 13 | 16 | ||
| 10 | 24 | 2 | -1 | 14 | 14 | ||
| 10 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 20 | ||
| 10 | 12 | 2 | -1 | 16 | 17 | ||
| 10 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 17 | 13 | ||
| 10 | 12 | 2 | -1 | 18 | 18 | ||
| 10 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 19 | ||
| 4 | 12 | 2 | -1 | 20 | 15 |
| Density (g/cm3) ±0.05 | Average pore width (nm) ±0.01 | Overall pore volume (cm3/g) ±0.06 | BET surface area (m2g) ±10 | Sample No. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.37 | 14.2 | 0.46 | 65 | 1 |
| 0.38 | 14.1 | 0.47 | 66 | 2 |
| 0.43 | 16.1 | 0.33 | 51 | 3 |
| 0.46 | 16.4 | 0.32 | 50 | 4 |
| 0.49 | 17.3 | 0.35 | 49 | 5 |
| 0.26 | 13.4 | 0.40 | 67 | 6 |
| 0.35 | 15.4 | 0.39 | 62 | 7 |
| 0.32 | 13.5 | 0.49 | 69 | 8 |
| 0.20 | 12.2 | 0.42 | 70 | 9 |
| 0.45 | 16.5 | 0.35 | 50 | 10 |
| 0.35 | 13.1 | 0.49 | 63 | 11 |
| 0.29 | 12.9 | 0.34 | 68 | 12 |
| 0.35 | 20.2 | 0.33 | 50 | 13 |
| 0.32 | 18.9 | 0.38 | 49 | 14 |
| 0.56 | 28.7 | 0.31 | 42 | 15 |
| 0.46 | 23.5 | 0.32 | 45 | 16 |
| aerogel was not synthesized | 17 | |||
| 0.50 | 25.4 | 0.25 | 47 | 18 |
| 0.56 | 29.1 | 0.26 | 46 | 19 |
| aerogel was not synthesized | 20 | |||
| 0.39 | 13.7 | 0.45 | 64 | Optimal sample |
Analysis of variance results.
| P-value | F-value | Adj MS | Adj SS | DF | Coef | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.000 | 56.224 | Constant | ||||
| 0.000 | 54.99 | 243.98 | 2439.82 | 10 | Model | |
| 0.000 | 273.34 | 1212.74 | 1212.74 | 1 | 8.006 | Blocks 1 |
| 0.000 | 86.50 | 383.79 | 1151.38 | 3 | Linear | |
| 0.000 | 244.73 | 1085.78 | 1085.78 | 1 | 9.320 | Time period_S.E. (h) |
| 0.007 | 12.19 | 54.08 | 54.08 | 1 | 2.080 | wt% starch |
| 0.142 | 2.60 | 11.52 | 11.52 | 1 | 0.960 | Retrogradation time (day) |
| 0.003 | 10.31 | 45.74 | 137.23 | 3 | Square | |
| 0.001 | 22.11 | 98.07 | 98.07 | 1 | -3.092 | Time period_S.E. (h) * Time period_S.E. (h) |
| 0.044 | 5.46 | 24.22 | 24.22 | 1 | -1.537 | wt% starch * wt% starch |
| 0.131 | 2.76 | 12.24 | 12.24 | 1 | -1.092 | Retrogradation time (day) * Retrogradation time (day) |
| 0.535 | 0.78 | 3.46 | 10.38 | 3 | 2-way interaction | |
| 0.270 | 1.38 | 6.12 | 6.12 | 1 | 0.875 | Time period_S.E. (h) * wt% starch |
| 0.423 | 0.70 | 3.12 | 3.12 | 1 | 0.625 | Time period_S.E. (h) * Retrogradation time (day) |
| 0.627 | 0.25 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1 | -0.375 | wt% starch * Retrogradation time (day) |
| 4.44 | 39.93 | 9 | Error | |||
| 0.072 | 5.01 | 6.89 | 34.43 | 5 | lack-of-fit | |
| 1.38 | 5.50 | 4 | Pure error | |||
| 2479.75 | 19 | Total |
| Drugs | Matrix | Specific loading (g/m2) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ibuprofen | Potato starch | 1-2x 10-3 | [14] |
| Eurylon 7 starch | 2-4x 10-3 | ||
| Alginate | 0.7-1.1x 10-3 | ||
| Silica | 0.42x 10-3 | [31] | |
| Starch | 1.4x 10-3 | ||
| Alginate | 1x 10-3 | ||
| Silica-gelatin | 0.34x 10-3 | [32] | |
| Artemisinin | Silica | 0.35x 10-3 | [31] |
| Starch | 0.18x 10-3 | ||
| Alginate | 0.30x 10-3 | ||
| Ketoprofen | Silica-gelatin | 0.20x 10-3 | [32] |
| Alginate | 0.67x 10-3 | [10] | |
| Alginate-pectin | 0.49x 10-3 | ||
| Alginate-carrageenan | 0.41x 10-3 | ||
| Silica | 0.15x 10-3 | [17] | |
| Alginate | 0.23x 10-3 | ||
| Pectin | 0.35x 10-3 | ||
| Starch | 0.10x 10-3 | ||
| Triflusal | Silica-gelatin | 0.41x 10-3 | [32] |
| Quercetin | Alginate | 0.10x 10-3 | [10] |
| Alginate-pectin | 0.14x 10-3 | ||
| Alginate-carrageenan | 0.10x 10-3 | ||
| Nifedipine | High-methoxyl pectin | 0.57x 10-3 | [33] |