| Literature DB >> 33488101 |
Qiaoling Zheng1,2, Jianyong Zhang1,3, Xinchen Wang4, Wenxiong Zhang1, Yipo Xiao4, Sheng Hu1, Jianjun Xu1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Increased use of low-dose spiral computed tomography (LDCT: low-dose computed tomography) screening has contributed to more frequent incidental detection of peripheral lung nodules, part of them were adenocarcinoma, which need to be further evaluated to establish a definitive diagnosis. Here, our primary objective was to evaluate the ambient mass spectrometry (AMS) sputum analysis as a non-invasive lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) diagnosis solution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Neutral desorption extractive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ND-EESI-MS) and collision induced dissociation (CID) were used to detect sputum metabolites from 143 spontaneous sputum samples. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was used to refine the biomarker panel, whereas orthogonal PLS-DA (OPLS-DA) was used to operationalize the enhanced biomarker panel for diagnosis.Entities:
Keywords: ND-EESI-MS; diagnosis; lung cancer; metabolomics; non-invasive detection
Year: 2021 PMID: 33488101 PMCID: PMC7816046 DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S269300
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Onco Targets Ther ISSN: 1178-6930 Impact factor: 4.147
Characteristics of Study Participants
| Characteristics | LAC* | Control Group (Con) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ben# | Hea& | ||
| Number | 76 | 28 | 39 |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 60.1 ± 8.7 | 63.4 ± 9.4 | 58.6 ± 9.8 |
| Gender (Male/Female) | 32/44 | 13/15 | 17/22 |
| Smoking Index > 400 | 23.70% | 25.00% | 23.10% |
| Clinical Cancer Stage | |||
| I | 21 | ||
| II | 41 | ||
| III | 14 | ||
| Pathological Diagnosis | |||
| Bronchiectasis | 12 | ||
| Hamartoma | 9 | ||
| Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor | 7 | ||
Abbreviations: *LAC, lung adenocarcinoma; #Ben, benign disease; &Hea, healthy individuals
Figure 1Typical ND-EESI-MS spectra in positive mode of human sputum samples of a lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) patient and a control group.
Figure 2Heat map of significantly changed metabolites detected by ND-EESI-MS for comparison of LAC/Con.
Significant Metabolites Detected by ND-EESI-MS
| Metabolite | AUC | VIPa | p.valueb | FDR q-value | Fold Change (LAC/Con) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydroxyphenyl lactic acid | m/z 181.07 | 0.80 | 1.22 | 1.08E-08 | 4.53E-08 | 1.67 |
| Phytosphingosine | m/z 318.29 | 0.79 | 1.29 | 1.15E-07 | 4.01E-07 | 0.55 |
| N-Nonanoylglycine | m/z 214.15 | 0.79 | 1.74 | 1.88E-09 | 1.97E-08 | 2.07 |
| Sphinganine | m/z 302.38 | 0.78 | 1.08 | 1.06E-08 | 4.53E-08 | 0.68 |
| S-Carboxymethyl-L-cysteine | m/z 180.04 | 0.77 | 1.02 | 8.67E-09 | 4.53E-08 | 0.70 |
| Ornithine | m/z 131.07 | 0.74 | 1.04 | 2.89E-07 | 8.68E-07 | 1.55 |
| Succinic acid | m/z 116.93 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 2.13E-06 | 5.58E-06 | 1.44 |
| L-Fucose | m/z 165.09 | 0.72 | 0.88 | 6.69E-06 | 1.17E-05 | 0.72 |
| L-Carnitine | m/z 142.09 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 5.26E-06 | 1.17E-05 | 0.79 |
| Acetylphenylalanine | m/z 415.21 | 0.69 | 1.01 | 5.86E-06 | 1.17E-05 | 0.69 |
| Caprylic acid | m/z 145.18 | 0.68 | 0.89 | 6.41E-06 | 1.17E-05 | 0.63 |
| 5-Hydroxymethyluracil | m/z 141.01 | 0.68 | 0.52 | 2.89E-04 | 4.65E-04 | 1.20 |
| Linoleic acid | m/z 303.23 | 0.67 | 0.96 | 4.61E-04 | 6.05E-04 | 1.56 |
| L-Lactic acid | m/z 89.02 | 0.67 | 1.04 | 5.33E-04 | 6.58E-04 | 1.68 |
| N-Succinyl-L-glutamate-5-semialdehyde | m/z 254.06 | 0.66 | 0.85 | 9.35E-04 | 0.00109 | 1.41 |
| 5-Methyl tetrahydrofolate | m/z 231.12 | 0.66 | 0.82 | 3.10E-04 | 4.65E-04 | 1.39 |
| Hexanoyl carnitine | m/z 258.17 | 0.66 | 0.82 | 3.44E-04 | 4.81E-04 | 1.39 |
| Tetradecanoyl carnitine | m/z 394.29 | 0.65 | 0.82 | 0.001734 | 0.00182 | 0.67 |
| Propionylcholine | m/z 321.29 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.001174 | 0.00129 | 1.24 |
Notes: aVariable importance in projection (VIP) values obtained from the partial least squares-discriminant analysis model, bp values calculated using Student’s t-test.
Abbreviations: LAC, lung adenocarcinoma; Con, control group; FDR, false discovery rate; AUC, area under the curve.
Figure 3Differential characteristics of enhanced biomarker panel with 5 differential metabolites (AUC > 0.75 and VIP > 1) detected by ND-EESI-MS for distinguishing between lung adenocarcinoma patients (LAC, n = 76) and controls (Con, n = 67). (A) Log10- transformed relative abundance of 5 differential metabolites for comparison between LAC and Con. (B) QC normalized relative abundance data were log10-transformed and Pareto scaled. Score plot of the OPLS-DA model for discrimination between LAC and Con. [R2X (cum)= 0.301, R2Y (cum)= 0.228, Q2 (cum)= 0.494]. (C) QC normalized relative abundance data were log10-transformed and Pareto scaled. ROC curve illustrating the classification performance of the 5-metabolite OPLS-DA model for distinguishing between LAC and Con. [AUROC = 0.917, 95% CI: 0.861–0.965, sensitivity: 0.9, specificity: 0.8]. (D) QC normalized relative abundance data were log10-transformed and Pareto scaled. External validation of OPLS-DA model with 50% sample holdout: cross-validation classification accuracy of 87.9% using a PLS-DA classifier.
Figure 4The metabolome view of pathway enrichment analysis comparing LAC patients and controls. (A) Overview of the most important metabolomic changes observed by ND-EESI-MS in sputum of lung adenocarcinoma patients, 1: Sphingolipid metabolism, 2: Tyrosine metabolism, 3: Ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis, 4: Arginine and proline metabolism, 5: Linoleic acid metabolism. (B) Metabolic network showing significant differences in sphingolipid metabolism, fatty acid metabolism, carnitine synthesis and Warburg effect, etc.