| Literature DB >> 33488009 |
Ahmed Al Habash1, Wael Otaif2, Deepak P Edward3,4, Ibrahim Al Jadaan4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of illuminated microcatheter-assisted trabeculotomy as a secondary procedure in patients with primary congenital glaucoma (PCG).Entities:
Keywords: 360°; Schlemm's canal; childhood glaucoma; illuminated microcatheter; primary congenital glaucoma; trabeculotomy
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33488009 PMCID: PMC7813142 DOI: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_317_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0974-9233
Figure 1Introduction of the tip of an illuminated microcatheter into Schlemm's canal and threading along the entire circumference of the canal
Figure 2Successful 360° catheterization, demonstrated by catheter exit from the opposite cut end of the canal
Figure 3The two ends of the illuminated microcatheter are grasped and pulled in the opposite directions, resulting in incision of Schlemm's canal
Clinical characteristics of patients with primary congenital glaucoma, before and after illuminated circumferential trabeculotomy surgery
| Patient/eye | Age at surgery (months) | Sex | Previous surgery | Trabeculotomy degrees | Preoperative | Follow-up duration | Postoperative (at the last follow-up visit) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acuity | IOP | C/D | Number of medications | Acuity | IOP | C/D | Number of medications | ||||||
| 1/OD | 20 | Female | DS | 360 | F and F | 30 | 0.4 | 2 | 24 | F and F | 13 | 0.4 | 0 |
| 2/OD | 4 | Female | DS | 200 | F and F | 26 | 0.6 | 4 | 36 | F and F | 11 | 0.6 | 2 |
| 3/OS | 86 | Female | DS | 360 | 20/20 | 22 | 0.5 | 4 | 36 | 20/20 | 9 | 0.4 | 0 |
| 4/OD | 63 | Female | DS | 360 | 20/30 | 22 | 0.7 | 4 | 36 | 20/20 | 19 | 0.5 | 0 |
| 5/OD | 20 | Male | DS | 360 | F and F | 38 | 0.85 | 4 | 18 | F and F | 23 | 0.9 | 4 |
| 6/OD | 46 | Female | DS | 270 | F and F | 30 | 0.85 | 4 | 12 | F and F | 20 | 0.85 | 4 |
| 7/OD | 108 | Male | T and T | 180 | 20/100 | 29 | 0.9 | 4 | 18 | 20/50 | 20 | 0.9 | 3 |
| 8/OS | 17 | Female | T and T | 270 | F and F | 23 | 0.5 | 4 | 24 | F and F | 16 | 0.5 | 1 |
| 9/OS | 12 | female | DS | 360 | F and F | 33 | 0.5 | 4 | 18 | F and F | 13 | 0.5 | 0 |
| 10/OS | 189 | Male | T and T | 360 | 20/30 | 36 | 0.9 | 4 | 18 | 20/30 | 14 | 0.9 | 0 |
| 11/OD | 195 | Male | DS×2 | 360 | 20/400 | 41 | 0.9 | 4 | 12 | 20/400 | 13 | 0.9 | 0 |
| 12/OS | 96 | Male | DS | 360 | 20/40 | 38 | 0.3 | 4 | 24 | 20/30 | 12 | 0.3 | 0 |
| 13/OS | 20 | Male | DS | 360 | F and F | 30 | 0.8 | 4 | 12 | F and F | 16 | 0.8 | 0 |
| 14/OS | 50 | Female | DS | 360 | F and F | 30 | 0.4 | 4 | 12 | 20/60 | 16 | 0.4 | 0 |
| 15/OD | 216 | Male | DS | 300 | 20/400 | 42 | 0.9 | 4 | 12 | 20/400 | 17 | 0.9 | 3 |
| 16/OS | 60 | Male | DS | 360 | F and F | 38 | 0.4 | 4 | 12 | F and F | 17 | 0.4 | 0 |
OD: Right eye, OS: Left eye, DS: Deep sclerectomy, T and T: Combined trabeculotomy and trabeculectomy, F and F: Fix and follow, IOP: Intraocular pressure, C/D: Cup-to-disc ratio
Comparison of preoperative and postoperative parameters
| Parameter | Preoperative | Postoperative | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOP (mmHg) | Mean±SD | 31.8±6.6 | 15.6±3.7 | <0.001† |
| Median (range) | 30.0 (22.0-42.0) | 16.0 (9.0-23.0) | <0.001‡ | |
| C/D ratio | Mean±SD | 0.6±0.2 | 0.6±0.2 | 0.285† |
| Median (range) | 0.6 (0.3-0.9) | 0.6 (0.3-0.9) | ||
| Medications | Mean±SD | 3.9±0.5 | 1.1±1.6 | 0.001† |
| Median (range) | 4.0 (2.0-4.0) | 0 (0-4.0) |
†Wilcoxon signed-rank test; ‡Paired t-test. IOP: Intraocular pressure, C/D: Cup-to-disc ratio, SD: Standard deviation
Comparison of intraocular pressure changes between extent of circumferential trabeculotomy
| Trabeculotomy extent | Preoperative IOP | Postoperative IOP | Change in IOP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 360° ( | 32.5±6.4† | 15.0±3.8 | 17.5±6.9 | <0.001‡ |
| <360° ( | 30.0±7.2 | 16.8±3.7 | 13.2±7.2 | <0.015‡ |
| Difference | - | - | 4.3 | 0.271§ |
†All values are shown as mean±SD, ‡Paired t-test, §Unpaired t-test. SD: Standard deviation, IOP: Intraocular pressure