Literature DB >> 33487210

Lack of viable severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among PCR-positive air samples from hospital rooms and community isolation facilities.

Sean Wei Xiang Ong1,2, Yian Kim Tan3, Kristen Kelli Coleman4,5, Boon Huan Tan3, Yee-Sin Leo1,2,5,6, Dong Ling Wang3, Ching Ging Ng3, Oon-Tek Ng1,2,6, Michelle Su Yen Wong3, Kalisvar Marimuthu1,2,5,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the extent of aerosol-based transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is important for tailoring interventions for control of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Multiple studies have reported the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid in air samples, but only one study has successfully recovered viable virus, although it is limited by its small sample size.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the extent of shedding of viable SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory aerosols from COVID-19 patients.
METHODS: In this observational air sampling study, air samples from airborne-infection isolation rooms (AIIRs) and a community isolation facility (CIF) housing COVID-19 patients were collected using a water vapor condensation method into liquid collection media. Samples were tested for presence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), and qRT-PCR-positive samples were tested for viability using viral culture.
RESULTS: Samples from 6 (50%) of the 12 sampling cycles in hospital rooms were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, including aerosols ranging from <1 µm to >4 µm in diameter. Of 9 samples from the CIF, 1 was positive via qRT-PCR. Viral RNA concentrations ranged from 179 to 2,738 ORF1ab gene copies per cubic meter of air. Virus cultures were negative after 4 blind passages.
CONCLUSION: Although SARS-CoV-2 is readily captured in aerosols, virus culture remains challenging despite optimized sampling methodologies to preserve virus viability. Further studies on aerosol-based transmission and control of SARS-CoV-2 are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; aerosols; air sampling; airborne; viral culture

Year:  2021        PMID: 33487210     DOI: 10.1017/ice.2021.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  7 in total

Review 1.  Source terms for benchmarking models of SARS-CoV-2 transmission via aerosols and droplets.

Authors:  Marc E J Stettler; Robert T Nishida; Pedro M de Oliveira; Léo C C Mesquita; Tyler J Johnson; Edwin R Galea; Angus Grandison; John Ewer; David Carruthers; David Sykes; Prashant Kumar; Eldad Avital; Asiri I B Obeysekara; Denis Doorly; Yannis Hardalupas; David C Green; Simon Coldrick; Simon Parker; Adam M Boies
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.653

2.  Sampling for SARS-CoV-2 Aerosols in Hospital Patient Rooms.

Authors:  Morgan A Lane; Maria Walawender; Andrew S Webster; Erik A Brownsword; Jessica M Ingersoll; Candace Miller; Jesse Waggoner; Timothy M Uyeki; William G Lindsley; Colleen S Kraft
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 5.048

3.  Revisiting SARS-CoV-2 environmental contamination by patients with COVID-19: The Omicron variant does not differ from previous strains.

Authors:  Itai Glinert; Amir Ben-Shmuel; Moran Szwartcwort-Cohen; Adi Beth-Din; Orly Laskar; Moria Barlev-Gross; Sharon Melamed; Noga Arbell; Haim Levy; Netanel A Horowitz; Shay Weiss
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 12.074

4.  Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in droplets and bioaerosols directly captured during breathing, speaking and coughing.

Authors:  Tyler J Johnson; Robert T Nishida; Ashlesha P Sonpar; Yi-Chan James Lin; Kimberley A Watson; Stephanie W Smith; John M Conly; David H Evans; Jason S Olfert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Disinfection and decontamination in the context of SARS-CoV-2-specific data.

Authors:  Nevio Cimolai
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 20.693

Review 6.  SARS-CoV-2 air sampling: A systematic review on the methodologies for detection and infectivity.

Authors:  Priscilla G Silva; Pedro T B S Branco; Ruben R G Soares; João R Mesquita; Sofia I V Sousa
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 6.554

7.  Live SARS-CoV-2 is difficult to detect in patient aerosols.

Authors:  Emily R Robie; Anfal Abdelgadir; Raquel A Binder; Gregory C Gray
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.380

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.