Zhongliang Zhu1, Guangyu Yang1, Weizhong Wang2, Yonglie Zhou3, Zhenzhen Pang1, Jiawei Liang1. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China. 2. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China. lab_wwz@126.com. 3. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China. lab_zhouyonglie@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to establish a regression equation model of serum bone metabolism markers. We analyzed the diagnostic value of bone metastases in lung cancer and provided laboratory evidence for the early clinical treatment of bone metastases in lung cancer. METHODS: A total of 339 patients with non-metastatic lung cancer, patients with lung cancer with bone metastasis, and patients with benign lung disease who were treated in our hospital from July 2012 to October 2015 were included. A total of 103 patients with lung cancer in the non-metastatic group, 128 patients with lung cancer combined with bone metastasis group, and 108 patients with benign lung diseases who had nontumor and nonbone metabolism-related diseases were selected as the control group. Detection and analysis of type I collagen carboxyl terminal peptide β-special sequence (β-CTX), total type I procollagen amino terminal propeptide (TPINP), N-terminal-mid fragment of osteocalcin (N-MID), parathyroid hormone (PTH), vitamin D (VitD3), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), calcium (CA), phosphorus (P), cytokeratin 19 fragment (F211), and other indicators were performed. Four multiple regression models were established to determine the best diagnostic model for lung cancer with bone metastasis. RESULTS: Analysis of single indicators of bone metabolism markers in lung cancer was performed, among which F211, β-CTX, TPINP, and ALP were significantly different (P < 0.05). The ROC curve of each indicator was less than 0.712. Based on the multiple regression models, the fourth model was the best and was much better than a single indicator with an AUC of 0.856, a sensitivity of 70.0%, a specificity of 91.0%, a positive predictive value of 82.5%, and a negative predictive value of 72.0%. CONCLUSION: Multiple regression models of bone metabolism markers were established. These models can be used to evaluate the progression of lung cancer and provide a basis for the early treatment of bone metastases.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to establish a regression equation model of serum bone metabolism markers. We analyzed the diagnostic value of bone metastases in lung cancer and provided laboratory evidence for the early clinical treatment of bone metastases in lung cancer. METHODS: A total of 339 patients with non-metastatic lung cancer, patients with lung cancer with bone metastasis, and patients with benign lung disease who were treated in our hospital from July 2012 to October 2015 were included. A total of 103 patients with lung cancer in the non-metastatic group, 128 patients with lung cancer combined with bone metastasis group, and 108 patients with benign lung diseases who had nontumor and nonbone metabolism-related diseases were selected as the control group. Detection and analysis of type I collagen carboxyl terminal peptide β-special sequence (β-CTX), total type I procollagen amino terminal propeptide (TPINP), N-terminal-mid fragment of osteocalcin (N-MID), parathyroid hormone (PTH), vitamin D (VitD3), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), calcium (CA), phosphorus (P), cytokeratin 19 fragment (F211), and other indicators were performed. Four multiple regression models were established to determine the best diagnostic model for lung cancer with bone metastasis. RESULTS: Analysis of single indicators of bone metabolism markers in lung cancer was performed, among which F211, β-CTX, TPINP, and ALP were significantly different (P < 0.05). The ROC curve of each indicator was less than 0.712. Based on the multiple regression models, the fourth model was the best and was much better than a single indicator with an AUC of 0.856, a sensitivity of 70.0%, a specificity of 91.0%, a positive predictive value of 82.5%, and a negative predictive value of 72.0%. CONCLUSION: Multiple regression models of bone metabolism markers were established. These models can be used to evaluate the progression of lung cancer and provide a basis for the early treatment of bone metastases.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone metabolism markers; Bone metastases; Lung cancer
Authors: Jonatan Dewulf; Christel Vangestel; Yannick Verhoeven; Peter van Dam; Filipe Elvas; Tim Van den Wyngaert; Philippe Clézardin Journal: Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-07-11 Impact factor: 2.346
Authors: H L Uy; G R Mundy; B F Boyce; B M Story; C R Dunstan; J J Yin; G D Roodman; T A Guise Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1997-08-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Kenneth R Hess; Gauri R Varadhachary; Sarah H Taylor; Wei Wei; Martin N Raber; Renato Lenzi; James L Abbruzzese Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-04-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: James L Mulshine; Ricardo S Avila; Ed Conley; Anand Devaraj; Laurie Fenton Ambrose; Tanya Flanagan; Claudia I Henschke; Fred R Hirsch; Robert Janz; Ryutaro Kakinuma; Stephen Lam; Annette McWilliams; Peter M A Van Ooijen; Matthijs Oudkerk; Ugo Pastorino; Anthony Reeves; Patrick Rogalla; Heidi Schmidt; Daniel C Sullivan; Haije H J Wind; Ning Wu; Murry Wynes; Xie Xueqian; David F Yankelevitz; John K Field Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2020-02