| Literature DB >> 33486657 |
Wanxue Wang1, Mahmoud Salama2, Plamen Todorov3, Dimirtry Spitkovsky4,5, Evgenia Isachenko1, Rico Bongaarts6, Gohar Rahimi1, Peter Mallmann1, Gennady Sukhikh5, Vladimir Isachenko7.
Abstract
As recently announced by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), human ovarian tissue cryopreservation is an established option for fertility preservation in prepubertal girls and young women undergoing gonadotoxic treatments for cancer as well as some autoimmune diseases. Proper ovarian tissue assessment before and after cryopreservation is essential to increase success rates. Ovarian fragments from 16 patients were divided into small pieces in form of cortex with medulla, and randomly divided into the following two groups. Pieces of Group 1 (n = 16) were frozen immediately after operation, thawed and just after thawing their quality was analyzed. Group 2 pieces (n = 16) after operation were cooled to 5 °C for 24 h, then frozen after 24 h pre-cooling to 5 °C, thawed and just after thawing their quality was analyzed. The effectiveness of the pre-freezing cooling of tissue was evaluated by the development and viability of follicles (Calcein-AM and Propidium Iodide) using complex object parametric analyzer and sorter machine (COPAS). Positive effect of cooling of cells to low supra-zero temperatures on their future development after re-warming has been observed. New flow cytometry- technique is suitable for the evaluation and sorting of cryopreserved whole human whole intact ovarian fragments. Long time (24 h) cooling of ovarian tissue to 5 °C before cryopreservation has a trend of a cell viability increasing.Entities:
Keywords: Autotransplantation; COPAS; Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue; FACS; Flow cytometry; Long-time cooling
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33486657 PMCID: PMC8426248 DOI: 10.1007/s10561-020-09898-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Tissue Bank ISSN: 1389-9333 Impact factor: 1.522
Fig. 1Basic characteristics of control group. a Microscope image of control group prepared for analysis on the COPAS Vision. b Microscopic image 5X of sorted fragments in control group. c Profiler plot of a relatively transparent and low auto-fluorescent fragment in control group. d Image of a relatively transparent and low autofluorescent fragment in control group. e. Profiler plot of a dark and medium auto-fluorescent fragment in control group. f. Image of a dark and medium auto-fluorescent fragment in control group. g Profiler plot of a smaller fragment with possible follicle in control group. h Image of a smaller fragment with possible follicle in control group. i Histogram comparing autofluorescence brightness of the different shapes of fragments in control group. (Color figure online)
Fig. 2Calcein-AM and PI staining data of fragments in control group a Profiler plot for two adherent staining fragments. The Green line represents the Calcein staining, the Red the PI staining. Due to the high sensitivity setting of the Red PMT we saturated the red signal. The sensitivity of the PMT was reduced to 300 V . b Brightfield image of two adherent staining fragments in control group. c and e are two profiler plots of larger staining fragments in control group . The adaptation to the red sensitivity shows the red line as PI staining more correct. The green Calcein staining on these fragments is very high. d and f are two images of larger staining fragments in control group. g Microscopic images of stained fragments in brightfield. h Microscopic images of stained fragments in green Calcein-AM. i Microscopic images of stained fragments in red PI . j Microscopic images of stained fragments with visible follicles in green Calcein-AM. k Histogram comparing fluorescence brightness of the different shapes of stained fragments in control group. (Color figure online)
Fig. 3Basic characteristics of pre-cooling group. a Profile of a small and more transparent fragment in pre-cooling group. b Image of a small and more transparent fragment in pre-cooling group. c Profile of a possible follicle with some embedded tissue in pre-cooling group. d Image of a possible follicle with some embedded tissue in pre-cooling group. e Profile of a larger and darker fragment in pre-cooling group. f Image of a larger and darker fragment in pre-cooling group. g Histogram comparing fluorescence brightness of the different shapes of fragments in pre-cooling group. (Color figure online)
Fig. 4Calcein-AM and PI staining data of fragments in pre-cooling group. a Profile of a darker fragment in pre-cooling group with PI and high Calcein staining. b Image of a darker fragment in pre-cooling group with PI and high Calcein staining. c Profile of a transparent fragment in pre-cooling group with PI and low Calcein staining. d Image of a transparent fragment in pre-cooling group with PI and low Calcein staining. e Microscopic image 10 × of a sorted staining fragment in pre-cooling group in brightfield. f Microscopic image 10 × of a sorted staining fragment in pre-cooling group in red. Upper right might be an embedded follicle. g and h are microscopic images that were made from several sorted fragments in pre-cooling group to find embedded follicles. The arrows point to the follicles. (Color figure online)