Literature DB >> 33486642

Evaluation of a Gene Expression Profiling Assay in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.

Aaron W Kangas-Dick1,2, Alissa Greenbaum3, Victor Gall3, Roman Groisberg4, Janice Mehnert4, Chunxia Chen5, Dirk F Moore5,6, Adam C Berger3, Vadim Koshenkov3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of deaths from cutaneous melanoma occur among patients with an initial diagnosis of stage 1 or 2 disease. The Decision-Dx Melanoma (DDM) 31-gene assay attempts to stratify these patients by risk of recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate this assay in a large single-institution series.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent surgery for melanoma at a large academic cancer center with DDM results was performed. Patient demographics, tumor pathologic characteristics, sentinel node status, gene expression profile (GEP) class, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were reviewed. The primary outcomes were recurrence of melanoma and distant metastatic recurrence.
RESULTS: Data from 361 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 15 months. Sentinel node biopsy was performed for 75.9% (n = 274) of the patients, 53 (19.4%) of whom tested positive. Overall, 13.6% (n = 49) of the patients had recurrence, and 8% (n = 29) had distant metastatic recurrence. The 3- and 5-year RFS rates were respectively 85% and 75% for the class 1A group, 74% and 47% for the class 1B/class 2A group, and 54% and 45% for the class 2B group. Increased Breslow thickness, ulceration, mitoses, sentinel node biopsy positivity, and GEP class 2B status were significantly associated with RFS and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in the univariate analysis (all p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, only Breslow thickness and ulceration were associated with RFS (p < 0.003), and only Breslow thickness was associated with DMFS (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Genetic profiling of cutaneous melanoma can assist in predicting recurrence and help determine the need for close surveillance. However, traditional pathologic factors remain the strongest independent predictors of recurrence risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33486642     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09563-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  13 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  Current controversies in early-stage melanoma: Questions on management and surveillance.

Authors:  Marki E Klapperich; Glen M Bowen; Douglas Grossman
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Use of a prognostic gene expression profile test for T1 cutaneous melanoma: Will it help or harm patients?

Authors:  Michael A Marchetti; Edmund K Bartlett; Stephen W Dusza; Christopher K Bichakjian
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2018-12-23       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Development of a prognostic genetic signature to predict the metastatic risk associated with cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Pedram Gerami; Robert W Cook; Jeff Wilkinson; Maria C Russell; Navneet Dhillon; Rodabe N Amaria; Rene Gonzalez; Stephen Lyle; Clare E Johnson; Kristen M Oelschlager; Gilchrist L Jackson; Anthony J Greisinger; Derek Maetzold; Keith A Delman; David H Lawson; John F Stone
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Gene Expression Profile Testing for Thin Melanoma: Evidence to Support Clinical Use Remains Thin.

Authors:  Carrie L Kovarik; Emily Y Chu; Adewole S Adamson
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 10.282

6.  More people die from thin melanomas (⩽1 mm) than from thick melanomas (>4 mm) in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  David C Whiteman; Peter D Baade; Catherine M Olsen
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 8.551

7.  Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group report number 1: prospective validation of a multi-gene prognostic assay in uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Michael D Onken; Lori A Worley; Devron H Char; James J Augsburger; Zelia M Correa; Eric Nudleman; Thomas M Aaberg; Michael M Altaweel; David S Bardenstein; Paul T Finger; Brenda L Gallie; George J Harocopos; Peter G Hovland; Hugh D McGowan; Tatyana Milman; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya; E Rand Simpson; Morton E Smith; David J Wilson; William J Wirostko; J William Harbour
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification.

Authors:  Charles M Balch; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Seng-Jaw Soong; John F Thompson; Michael B Atkins; David R Byrd; Antonio C Buzaid; Alistair J Cochran; Daniel G Coit; Shouluan Ding; Alexander M Eggermont; Keith T Flaherty; Phyllis A Gimotty; John M Kirkwood; Kelly M McMasters; Martin C Mihm; Donald L Morton; Merrick I Ross; Arthur J Sober; Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Clinical impact of a 31-gene expression profile test for cutaneous melanoma in 156 prospectively and consecutively tested patients.

Authors:  Adam C Berger; Robert S Davidson; J Kevin Poitras; Indy Chabra; Richard Hope; Amy Brackeen; Clare E Johnson; Derek J Maetzold; Brooke Middlebrook; Kristen M Oelschlager; Robert W Cook; Federico A Monzon; Alexander R Miller
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.580

10.  Prospective validation of the prognostic 31-gene expression profiling test in primary cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Jennifer Keller; Theresa L Schwartz; Jason M Lizalek; Ea-Sle Chang; Ashaki D Patel; Maria Y Hurley; Eddy C Hsueh
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.452

View more
  3 in total

1.  ASO Author Reflections: Gene Expression Profiling for Melanoma: Is it Ready for Prime Time?

Authors:  Aaron Kangas-Dick; Adam C Berger; Vadim Koshenkov
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma Immunohistochemistry Labeling in Uveal Melanomas.

Authors:  Saman S Ahmadian; Ian J Dryden; Andrea Naranjo; Angus Toland; Romain A Cayrol; Donald E Born; Peter S Egbert; Ryanne A Brown; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya; Jonathan H Lin
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2022-03-11

3.  Comments on Post-Publication Discussion of "Evaluation of a Gene Expression Profiling Assay in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma".

Authors:  Robert W Cook; Matthew S Goldberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.339

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.