Literature DB >> 33486440

Association between socioeconomic status and survival in glioblastoma: An Italian single-centre prospective observational study.

Alicia Tosoni1, Lidia Gatto1, Enrico Franceschi2, Vincenzo Di Nunno1, Raffaele Lodi3, Antonella Mura1, Monica Di Battista1, Stefania Bartolini1, Alba Ariela Brandes1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, no prospective study has been conducted to investigate the role of socioeconomic status (SES) on clinical outcome of glioblastoma (GBM) in Italy, where there is a National Health Service that provides universal coverage regardless of the patient's economic status.
METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study investigating the association between SES and survival in GBM patients at our institution, a hub centre for brain cancer research and treatment. We included GBM patients who underwent medical treatment or chemo-radiation between April 2017 and December 2017. The SES was measured using the income-brackets, attributed by the Italian Ministry of Finance on the basis of the income of the fiscal family unit, referring to the previous year.
RESULTS: One hundred and six patients were included in the study. In multivariate analysis, overall survival (OS) correlated significantly with higher-income (HR = 0.623.95% CI 0.467-0.832; p = 0.001) and MGMT methylation status (HR = 0.158.95% CI 0.082-0.304; P < 0.001). When adjusted for age, performance status and extension of surgery, survival benefit remained superior for higher-income HR = 0.641 (95% CI 0.478-0.858; p = 0.003) and MGMT methylated tumours HR = 0.167 (95% CI 0.084-0.331; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: SES is an important determinant of prognosis in GBM even in the Italian National Health Service, which provides universal, largely free and relatively comprehensive healthcare. Despite aspirations to achieve equality in healthcare, socioeconomic differences exist and may impact the clinical outcome.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain tumours; Equal care; Glioblastoma; Prognosis; Sociodemographic factors; Socioeconomic status

Year:  2021        PMID: 33486440     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  2 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacotherapeutic Treatment of Glioblastoma: Where Are We to Date?

Authors:  Lidia Gatto; Vincenzo Di Nunno; Enrico Franceschi; Alicia Tosoni; Stefania Bartolini; Alba Ariela Brandes
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Prognostic impact of obesity in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma: a secondary analysis of CeTeG/NOA-09 and GLARIUS.

Authors:  Johannes Weller; Niklas Schäfer; Christina Schaub; Anna-Laura Potthoff; Joachim P Steinbach; Uwe Schlegel; Michael Sabel; Peter Hau; Clemens Seidel; Dietmar Krex; Roland Goldbrunner; Torsten Pietsch; Theophilos Tzaridis; Thomas Zeyen; Valeri Borger; Erdem Güresir; Hartmut Vatter; Ulrich Herrlinger; Matthias Schneider
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.506

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.