Francesca Paolini1, Carla Amici2, Mariantonia Carosi3, Claudia Bonomo3, Paola Di Bonito4, Aldo Venuti1, Luisa Accardi5. 1. HPV Unit, UOSD Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144, Rome, Italy. 2. Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy. 3. Anatomy Pathology Unit, Department of Research, Diagnosis and Innovative Technologies, IRCCS-Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144, Rome, Italy. 4. Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161, Rome, Italy. 5. Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161, Rome, Italy. luisa.accardi@iss.it.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The oncogenic activity of the high risk human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) is fully dependent on the E6 and E7 viral oncoproteins produced during viral infection. The oncoproteins interfere with cellular homeostasis by promoting proliferation, inhibiting apoptosis and blocking epithelial differentiation, driving the infected cells towards neoplastic progression. The causal relationship between expression of E6/E7 and cellular transformation allows inhibiting the oncogenic process by hindering the activity of the two oncoproteins. We previously developed and characterized some antibodies in single-chain format (scFvs) against the HPV16 E6 and E7 proteins, and demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo their antitumor activity consisting of protective efficacy against tumor progression of HPV16-positive cells. METHODS: Envisioning clinical application of the best characterized anti-HPV16 E6 and -HPV16 E7 scFvs, we verified their activity in the therapeutic setting, on already implanted tumors. Recombinant plasmids expressing the anti-HPV16 E6 scFvI7 with nuclear targeting sequence, or the anti-HPV16 E7 scFv43M2 with endoplasmic reticulum targeting sequence were delivered by injection followed by electroporation to three different preclinical models using C57/BL6 mice, and their effect on tumor growth was investigated. In the first model, the HPV16+ TC-1 Luc cells were used to implant tumors in mice, and tumor growth was measured by luciferase activity; in the second model, a fourfold number of TC-1 cells was used to obtain more aggressively growing tumors; in the third model, the HPV16+ C3 cells where used to rise tumors in mice. To highlight the scFv possible mechanism of action, H&E and caspase-3 staining of tumor section were performed. RESULTS: We showed that both the anti-HPV16 E6 and HPV16 E7 scFvs tested were efficacious in delaying tumor progression in the three experimental models and that their antitumor activity seems to rely on driving tumor cells towards the apoptotic pathway. CONCLUSION: Based on our study, two scFvs have been identified that could represent a safe and effective treatment for the therapy of HPV16-associated lesions. The mechanism underlying the scFv effectiveness appears to be leading cells towards death by apoptosis. Furthermore, the validity of electroporation, a methodology allowed for human treatment, to deliver scFvs to tumors was confirmed.
BACKGROUND: The oncogenic activity of the high risk human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) is fully dependent on the E6 and E7 viral oncoproteins produced during viral infection. The oncoproteins interfere with cellular homeostasis by promoting proliferation, inhibiting apoptosis and blocking epithelial differentiation, driving the infected cells towards neoplastic progression. The causal relationship between expression of E6/E7 and cellular transformation allows inhibiting the oncogenic process by hindering the activity of the two oncoproteins. We previously developed and characterized some antibodies in single-chain format (scFvs) against the HPV16E6 and E7 proteins, and demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo their antitumor activity consisting of protective efficacy against tumor progression of HPV16-positive cells. METHODS: Envisioning clinical application of the best characterized anti-HPV16E6 and -HPV16 E7 scFvs, we verified their activity in the therapeutic setting, on already implanted tumors. Recombinant plasmids expressing the anti-HPV16E6 scFvI7 with nuclear targeting sequence, or the anti-HPV16 E7 scFv43M2 with endoplasmic reticulum targeting sequence were delivered by injection followed by electroporation to three different preclinical models using C57/BL6 mice, and their effect on tumor growth was investigated. In the first model, the HPV16+ TC-1 Luc cells were used to implant tumors in mice, and tumor growth was measured by luciferase activity; in the second model, a fourfold number of TC-1 cells was used to obtain more aggressively growing tumors; in the third model, the HPV16+ C3 cells where used to rise tumors in mice. To highlight the scFv possible mechanism of action, H&E and caspase-3 staining of tumor section were performed. RESULTS: We showed that both the anti-HPV16E6 and HPV16 E7 scFvs tested were efficacious in delaying tumor progression in the three experimental models and that their antitumor activity seems to rely on driving tumor cells towards the apoptotic pathway. CONCLUSION: Based on our study, two scFvs have been identified that could represent a safe and effective treatment for the therapy of HPV16-associated lesions. The mechanism underlying the scFv effectiveness appears to be leading cells towards death by apoptosis. Furthermore, the validity of electroporation, a methodology allowed for human treatment, to deliver scFvs to tumors was confirmed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Antitumor intracellular antibodies; Apoptosis; Gene delivery by electroporation; HPV-associated cancer; HPV16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins; Therapeutic single-chain antibody fragments
Authors: Xavier Castellsagué; Laia Alemany; Miquel Quer; Gordana Halec; Beatriz Quirós; Sara Tous; Omar Clavero; Llúcia Alòs; Thorsten Biegner; Tomasz Szafarowski; Maria Alejo; Dana Holzinger; Enrique Cadena; Edith Claros; Gillian Hall; Jan Laco; Mario Poljak; Maria Benevolo; Elena Kasamatsu; Hisham Mehanna; Cathy Ndiaye; Núria Guimerà; Belen Lloveras; Xavier León; Juan C Ruiz-Cabezas; Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero; Chang-Suk Kang; Jin-Kyoung Oh; Marcial Garcia-Rojo; Ermina Iljazovic; Oluseyi F Ajayi; Flora Duarte; Ashrafun Nessa; Leopoldo Tinoco; Marco A Duran-Padilla; Edyta C Pirog; Halina Viarheichyk; Hesler Morales; Valérie Costes; Ana Félix; Maria Julieta V Germar; Marisa Mena; Arzu Ruacan; Asha Jain; Ravi Mehrotra; Marc T Goodman; Luis Estuardo Lombardi; Annabelle Ferrera; Sani Malami; Estela I Albanesi; Pablo Dabed; Carla Molina; Rubén López-Revilla; Václav Mandys; Manuel E González; Julio Velasco; Ignacio G Bravo; Wim Quint; Michael Pawlita; Nubia Muñoz; Silvia de Sanjosé; F Xavier Bosch Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Luisa Accardi; Maria Gabriella Donà; Anna M Mileo; Marco G Paggi; Antonio Federico; Paola Torreri; Tamara C Petrucci; Rosita Accardi; David Pim; Massimo Tommasino; Lawrence Banks; Barbara Chirullo; Colomba Giorgi Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2011-01-17 Impact factor: 4.430