Caitlin M Turner1, Sean Arayasirikul2, Erin C Wilson3. 1. Trans Research Unit for Equity, Center for Public Health Research, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: Caitlin.Turner@sfdph.org. 2. Trans Research Unit for Equity, Center for Public Health Research, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. Trans Research Unit for Equity, Center for Public Health Research, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Marginalization of sex work presents numerous risks for trans women (TW) engaged in the sex trade, including criminalization, traumatization, and contracting HIV. We identified socio-economic and HIV risk disparities among trans women sex workers and others who do sex work (TWSW/OWSW), and evaluated these disparities for TWSW/OWSW compared to TW not engaged in sex work from pre- and post-implementation of the US 2018 "Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act" and "Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act" (FOSTA-SESTA). METHODS: We analyzed 429 trans women (TW) from the Trans*National cohort study (2016-2019). Generalized estimating equations (GEE) characterized differences in socio-economic and HIV risk outcomes for TWSW/OWSW compared to TW not engaged in sex work over the study period. Adjusted, pre-to-post law changes in these outcomes for TWSW/OWSW versus TW not engaged in sex work were compared using difference-in-differences GEE regression analyses. RESULTS: Over 18 months, TWSW/OWSW had higher adjusted odds of being unstably housed, having income from criminalized sources, experiencing transphobic hate crimes, experiencing discrimination from police/courts, being incarcerated, meeting sex partners in the street/public settings, meeting sex partners on Craigslist or other online forums (except dating apps), or engaging in condomless anal intercourse, (p < 0.01 for all comparisons); TWSW/OWSW also had a higher mean number of income sources (p = 0.03). One difference-in-differences analysis showed additive interaction: the adjusted mean number of income sources reported by TWSW/OWSW compared to those not engaged in sex work decreased from pre-to post-FOSTA-SESTA (from 1.79 to 1.48 for TWSW/OWSW and from 1.52 to 1.47 for TW not engaged in sex work; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in socio-economic and HIV-related risk outcomes exist for TWSW/OWSW in San Francisco. There is an urgent need for comprehensive, long-term follow-up data of TW to accurately analyze policy effects, especially given the recent enactment of a number of other policies targeting TW. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
INTRODUCTION: Marginalization of sex work presents numerous risks for trans women (TW) engaged in the sex trade, including criminalization, traumatization, and contracting HIV. We identified socio-economic and HIV risk disparities among trans women sex workers and others who do sex work (TWSW/OWSW), and evaluated these disparities for TWSW/OWSW compared to TW not engaged in sex work from pre- and post-implementation of the US 2018 "Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act" and "Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act" (FOSTA-SESTA). METHODS: We analyzed 429 trans women (TW) from the Trans*National cohort study (2016-2019). Generalized estimating equations (GEE) characterized differences in socio-economic and HIV risk outcomes for TWSW/OWSW compared to TW not engaged in sex work over the study period. Adjusted, pre-to-post law changes in these outcomes for TWSW/OWSW versus TW not engaged in sex work were compared using difference-in-differences GEE regression analyses. RESULTS: Over 18 months, TWSW/OWSW had higher adjusted odds of being unstably housed, having income from criminalized sources, experiencing transphobic hate crimes, experiencing discrimination from police/courts, being incarcerated, meeting sex partners in the street/public settings, meeting sex partners on Craigslist or other online forums (except dating apps), or engaging in condomless anal intercourse, (p < 0.01 for all comparisons); TWSW/OWSW also had a higher mean number of income sources (p = 0.03). One difference-in-differences analysis showed additive interaction: the adjusted mean number of income sources reported by TWSW/OWSW compared to those not engaged in sex work decreased from pre-to post-FOSTA-SESTA (from 1.79 to 1.48 for TWSW/OWSW and from 1.52 to 1.47 for TW not engaged in sex work; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in socio-economic and HIV-related risk outcomes exist for TWSW/OWSW in San Francisco. There is an urgent need for comprehensive, long-term follow-up data of TW to accurately analyze policy effects, especially given the recent enactment of a number of other policies targeting TW. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Entities:
Keywords:
Difference-in-differences; Health disparities; Policy analysis; Sex trade; Sex work; Trans women
Authors: Alan E Hubbard; Jennifer Ahern; Nancy L Fleischer; Mark Van der Laan; Sheri A Lippman; Nicholas Jewell; Tim Bruckner; William A Satariano Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Stefan David Baral; M Reuel Friedman; Scott Geibel; Kevin Rebe; Borche Bozhinov; Daouda Diouf; Keith Sabin; Claire E Holland; Roy Chan; Carlos F Cáceres Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 79.321